THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING AND ITS APPLICATION FOR FLOATING FISH NET CULTURE

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/geoplanning.4.1.41-52
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Article Info
Submitted: 03-10-2016
Published: 20-01-2017
Section: Articles

Marine spatial planning has become the crucial issues for an archipelagic state such as Indonesia. The global market demand on marine economic species has been initiated the exploitation of the marine species which will become the hindrance in maintaining the sustainable marine biodiversity. Besides that, the degradation of marine species will also become the problem for traditional fishermen. Therefore, a model has to be employed to spatially manage the coastal waters as the alternative for fishermen activities during closed seasons, such as floating fish net culture.  The aim of this study was to develop marine spatial planning model based on ecological approach in order to identify the potentiality of marine waters for marine culture such as floating fish net culture. The method for the model consisted of social assessment using the Delphi for developing the rule of marine planning for floating fish net culture and the spatial analysis technique for determining the model of marine spatial planning for floating fish net culture. The area of Kupang Bay waters, East Nusa Tenggara was used as the study area. The result indicated that the model can be used to sustainable marine spatial planning, especially for floating fish net culture. The model considered the aspects of potential area for marine culture, the management of zonation and transportation lanes, the conservation and protected area and the strategic area. Application in Kupang bay illustrated the aspect of technology input such as raceways since the majority of the area of Kupang Bay waters is classified as medium potential. Further research still needs to optimum the application of model to others marine area.

Keywords

Marine biodiversity; spatial planning; ecological and economic model; floating fish net culture

  1. Dewayany Sutrisno 
    Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia , Indonesia

Affan, J. M. (2012). Identifikasi lokasi untuk pengembangan budidaya keramba jaring apung (KJA) berdasarkan faktor lingkungan dan kualitas air di perairan pantai timur Bangka Tengah. DEPIK Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Perairan, Pesisir dan Perikanan, 1(1), 78-85.

Arief, M., et al. (2013). Pengembangan Metode Pendugaan Kedalaman Perairan Dangkal Menggunakan Data Satelit Spot-4 Studi Kasus: Teluk Ratai, Kabupaten Pesawaran (Methode Development For Shallow Water Depth Bathymetric Estimation Using Spot-4 Satellite Data, A Case Study: Ratai Bay, Pesawaran District). Jurnal Penginderaan Jauh dan Pengolahan Data Citra Digital, 10(1), 1-14.

Bakosurtanal. (2009). Kajian Potensi Sumberdaya Pesisir Kabupaten Boalemo. Jakarta.

Bappeda NTT. (2007). Rencana Zonasi: Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur.

Beveridge, M. C. M. (2008). Cage Aquaculture. Wiley. [Google Books]

Black, K. D. (2001). Environmental impacts of aquaculture. Sheffield Biological Sciences.

BPS. (2008). Kabupaten Gorontalo Utara dalam Angka 2008. BPS Gorontalo.

Chapman, E. D. (1996). Chapter 3 - Selection of water quality variables.

De Silva, S. S., & Phillips, M. J. (2007). A review of cage aquaculture: Asia (excluding China). FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 498, 21.

Douvere, F. (2008). The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Marine Policy, 32(5), 762–771. [CrossRef]

Douvere, F., & Ehler, C. N. (2009). New perspectives on sea use management: Initial findings from European experience with marine spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(1), 77–88. [CrossRef]

Gilliland, P. M., & Laffoley, D. (2008). Key elements and steps in the process of developing ecosystem-based marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 32(5), 787–796. [CrossRef]

Gorlach-Lira, K., et al. (2013). The influence of fish culture in floating net cages on microbial indicators of water quality. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 73(3), 457–463.

Hartoko, A., & Kangkan, A. L. (2009). Spatial modeling for mariculture site selection based on ecosystem parameters at Kupang Bay, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. International Journal of Remote Sensing and Earth Sciences (IJReSES), 6(1), 57-64

Heard, W. R., & Martin, R. M. (1979). Floating horizontal and vertical raceways used in freshwater and estuarine culture of juvenile salmon, Oncorhynchus spp. Marine Fisheries Review, 41(3), 18–23.

Hegland, T. J., Raakjær, J., & van Tatenhove, J. (2015). Implementing ecosystem-based marine management as a process of regionalisation: Some lessons from the Baltic Sea. Ocean & Coastal Management, 117, 14–22. [CrossRef]  

Jahani, N., et al. (2012). The effect of marine fish cage culture on benthic communities using bopa index in ghazale creek. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences, 11(1), 78–88.

Liao, I. C., et al. (2004). Cobia culture in Taiwan: current status and problems. Aquaculture, 237(1), 155–165.

Mente, E., Pierce, G. J., Santos, M. B., & Neofitou, C. (2006). Effect of feed and feeding in the culture of salmonids on the marine aquatic environment: a synthesis for European aquaculture. Aquaculture International, 14(5), 499–522. [CrossRef

Mukuan, E. M. R., So, S., Arfiati, D., & Ch. Kepel, R. (2014). Development Opportunity Of Floating Net Cage (Fnc) SystemTrevally (Caranx Spp.) Culture Business In Amurang District, South Minahasa Regency, North Sulawesi, Indonesia. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16(9), 44–49. [CrossRef]

Murray, A. G., & Salama, N. K. G. (2016). A simple model of the role of area management in the control of sea lice. Ecological Modelling, 337, 39–47. [CrossRef]

Ntengwe, F. W., & Edema, M. O. (2008). Physico-chemical and microbiological characteristics of water for fish production using small ponds. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 33(8–13), 701–707. [CrossRef]

Oladokun, O. S., Nik, W. B. W., & Kader, A. S. A. (2013). Study of properties of components for offshore aquaculture technology farming. Journal of Science and Engineering, 1(2), 155–161.

Ouattara, N. I., et al. (2003). Aquaculture potential of the black-chinned tilapia, Sarotherodon melanotheron (Cichlidae). Comparative study of the effect of stocking density on growth performance of landlocked and natural populations under cage culture conditions in Lake Ayame (Côte d’Ivoire). Aquaculture Research, 34(13), 1223–1229.

Price, C., et al. (2015). Marine cage culture and the environment: effects on water quality and primary production. Aquaculture Environment Interactions, 6(2), 151–174.

Price, C. S., & Morris Jr, J. A. (2013). Marine cage culture and the environment: twenty-first century science informing a sustainable industry.

Rosnelly, R., & Utama, U. P. (2012). Sistem Pakar: Konsep dan Teori. Penerbit Andi.

Schenone, N. F., Vackova, L., & Cirelli, A. F. (2011). Fish-farming water quality and environmental concerns in Argentina: a regional approach. Aquaculture International, 19(5), 855–863. [CrossRef]

Setiawan, K. T., Osawa, T., & Nuarsa, I. W. (2014). Aplikasi algoritma Van Hengel dan Spitzer untuk ekstraksi informasi batimetri menggunakan data landsat. In Seminar Nasional Penginderaan Jauh (pp. 222–230).

Sutrisno, D. (2006). Marine Spatial Planning Analysis. Research Report. IPB Bogor.

Utama, F. W. (2008). Analisis kelayakan usaha budidaya ikan kerapu macan di Pulau Panggang, Kabupaten Administratif Kepulauan Seribu, DKI Jakarta. PhD Thesis.

Widiastuti, I. (2014). Small-scale Freshwater Aquaculture Practices in Indonesia: An application of Sustainable Livelihood Approach to Nile Tilapia Farmer in West Sumatera. PhD Thesis. Kagoshima University.

Wu, R. S. S. (1995). The environmental impact of marine fish culture: Towards a sustainable future. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 31(4–12), 159–166. [CrossRef]

Yin, K., Harrison, P. J., & Black, E. (2008). Risk Analysis of Coastal Aquaculture : Potential Effects on Algal Blooms. Assessment and Communication of Environmental Risks in Coastal Aquaculture, 76, 175–199.