*Nita Triana  -  Pascasarjana, IAIN-Purwokerto, Indonesia
Deddy Purwinto  -  Pascasarjana, IAIN-Purwokerto, Indonesia
Published: 30 Apr 2018.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2018 Diponegoro Law Review
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Citation Format:
This paper examines the dispute resolution of Sharia Banking. The method is a non-doctrinal legal research using qualitative research  and Socio Legal approach. Sharia banking cannot be separated from the problems between the banking and the Customer. This problem is calledproblematic financing. The resolution  of problematic financing of sharia banks in litigation is now the absolute authority of the Religious Courts. The downside of litigation settlement usually takes a long time, the need for proof, the cost is quite expensive and the result is winningor lost. Therefore, the settlement of sharia banking is very rarely resolved through litigation. Alternative Dispute Resolution is a choice of dispute settlement chosen by Sharia Banking. The first stage isto carry out negotiation between all parties, namely Banking (lender) and The Customer (Debtor) in the form of warning and guidance. If it does not succeed, there will bedebt restructuration. The second step is mediation, in the form of consultation with third party as a mediator.  The mediation determines the rescue process of debt by Banks when a debtor is still unable to return his debt, executed by the bank. According to Marc Galanter these various dispute resolutionsis called justice in many rooms. In Islamic Law it is known as Sulh (peace). However, to a large extent this non-litigation settlement is more satisfactory to both parties in resolving the dispute because it senses fairness and a win-win solution.
Keywords: Justice in Many Rooms;Dispute Resolution;Sharia Banking;Sulh

Article Metrics:

  1. Adolf, Huala, (2006). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
  2. Asnawi, M.Natsir, (2011). Menyoal Kompetensi Peradilan Agama dalam Menyelesaikan Perkara Ekonomi Syari’ah. Media Badilag,
  3. Galanter Marck, (1981). Justice in Many Rooms Court, Privat Ordering and Indigenous Law. The Journal of Legal Pluralism. No.19.Thn 1981.
  4. Goodpaster Gary, (1999). Panduan Negosiasi Dan Mediasi (Seri Dasar Hukum Ekonomi), Jakarta: ELIPS .
  5. Irianto Sulistyowati dan Lim Sing Meij, (2009) Praktek Penegakan Hukum: Arena Penelitian Sosiolegal yang Kaya. Metode Penelitian Hukum –Konstelasi dan Refleksi. Jurnal JHMP –(Terakreditasi) FH UI. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.
  6. Ismail, (2014). Perbankan Syariah. Jakarta : Kencana.
  7. Khalidah.Dahlan Nur, (2015). Arbitration and Mediation Method Applied to Islamic Finance Conflicts in Malaysia. Journal of Social Science Research. Vol 6 No.1. Malaysia.
  8. Maghfirah.Aliflanya Arisandy, Dwi AR, (2016). Sulh in Islamic Criminal Law as The Form of Restorative Justice. A New Framework In Indonesian Criminal Law. Scientific Corporations International Journal of Law and Politics .Vol 2 Issue 1 Juli.
  9. Manan, Abdul, (2012). Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah Dalam Perspektif Kewenangan Peradilan Agama.Jakarta : Kencana.
  10. Margono, Suyud, (2000). ADR dan Arbitrase, Proses Pelembagaan dan Aspek Hukum. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia.
  11. Philippe Nonet, & Selznick, Philip, (1973). Law and Society in Transition, Toward Responsive Law, N.Y. : Harper Colophon Books,.
  12. Prabowo Bagya Agung & Jasri Bin Jamal, (2017). Concept And Application Of Akad Wakalah In Murabaha Financing In Islamic Banking (A Comparative Study Between Indonesia And Malaysia), Diponegoro Law Review, April 2017, Volume 02, Number 01
  13. Rahmani.Al Ascel, (2008). Sulh: A Crucial Part of Islamic Arbitration. Law Society and Economiy .Working Paper .London School.
  14. Rahardjo, Satjipto “Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan”, Jurnal Hukum Progresif, Vol. 1, No. 1, April 2005.
  15. Setyowati Ro’fah, Lastuti Abubakar, Nunung Rodliah, (2017). Sharia Governance On Islamic Banking: Spiritual Rights Perspective On Consumer Protection In Indonesia, Diponegoro Law Review, April 2017, Volume 02, Number 01.
  16. Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy, (2014). Perbankan Syariah. Jakarta : Kencana.
  17. Sousa, Boaventura de Sousa, (1995). Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition, N.Y. : Routledge,
  18. Strauss and J Corbin, Busir, (1990). Qualitative Research, Grounded Theory Procedure and Techniques, London: Sage Publication.
  19. Tresnawati, Ita, (2015). Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Bermasalah Melalui Cara Non Litigasi Pada PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri, Tesis, Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.
  20. Triana, Nita, (2017). Reconstructing Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution Based on Indonesian Muslim Society Culture. Ijtimā’iyya: Journal of Muslim Society Research, Vol. 2(1)..
  21. Usanti P, Trisadani dan Shomad, Abd, (2013). Transaksi Bank Syariah. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
  22. Wahed.Hais, (2015). Sulh: Its Application in Malaysia. Journal of Humanities and Social Science IOSR_JHSS, Vol 20.Issue 6 Ver 11 June.
  23. Wall.A James, John B Stark and Rhetta L Standifer, (2001). Mediation ,A Current Review and Theory Development. Journal of Conflict Resolution. Vol.45. Issue 3.
  24. Zuhaili Wahbah, (2005). Al Fiqh al Islam wa Adillatuhu Juz IV, Damaskus Syria : Dar El Fikr..
  25. Undang-Undang Nomor 21 tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah
  26. Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 tentang Peradilan Agama.
  27. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa