COMMUNITY TRENDS TO CHOOSE THE SHARIA ECONOMIC SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

*Rabith Madah Khulaili Harsya  -  Doctoral Program in Law Science, the Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia
Published: 30 Apr 2018.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2018 Diponegoro Law Review
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Citation Format:
Abstract

The tendency of people to choose the Sharia Economic Dispute Settlement Institution. The facts of the lack of sharia economic case submitted and decided by litigation and non-litigation institutions are the background of the research. This research is a kind of explorative research that uses qualitative approach to mengunggkap legal facts in the context of sharia economy. Data in the form of questionnaires / questionnaires processed only to describe the percentage percentage of the economic tendency of sharia community to choose dispute settlement institutions. This description is a preliminary data that lead researchers to explore the points of question needed in the interview between the results of quantitative data processing with the facts on the ground shows that people choose various options in solving the dispute sharia economy.

Keywords: sharia economic dispute;solution;litigation;non-litigation

Article Metrics:

  1. Ali, Ahmad, (2013). Menjelajahi Kajian Empiris Terhadap Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana.
  2. Azhar, Cholidul, (2017). “Aspek Hukum Bank Syariah dalam Kaitannya dengan Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Agama”, http://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/publikasi/artikel/aspek-hukum-bank-syariah-dalam-kaitannya-dengan-kompetensi-absolut-pengadilan-agama-oleh-cholidul-azhar-sh-mhum-139, Accessed on March 12,.
  3. Bisri, Cik Hasan, (1996) Peradilan Agama di Indonesia, Jakarta: Raja Grapindo Persada,.
  4. Dahlan, Abdul Aziz, ed., (1996). Ensiklopedi Hukum Islam, Volume IV, New York: Ichitiar Baru van Hoeve,.
  5. Djamil, Faturrahman, (2014). Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Bermasalah di Bank Syariah, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
  6. Djauhari, Ahmad, (2006). Arbitrase Syari’ah di Indonesia, Jakarta: BASYARNAS,.
  7. Frietman, Lawrence M, 1(984) American Law, New York: WW. Norton & company.
  8. Fuady, Munir, (2010). Dinamika Teori Hukum, Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
  9. Fuady, Munir, (2003).Hukum Kontrak: Dari Sudut Pandang Hukum Bisnis, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
  10. Gautama, Sudargo, (1992). Hukum Perdata Internasional Indonesia, Jakarta: Bina Cipta, , Volume III, part 2, Book 8.
  11. Goodpaster, Garry, (1995) “Tinjauan terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa”, In Agnes Toar et al, Dasar Hukum Ekonomi 2 Abitrase Indonesia, Jakarta: Gralia Indonesia.
  12. Hasbi, (2009). Kompetensi Peradilan Agama dalam Perkara Ekonomi Syariah, Dissertation, Jakarta : Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Graduate School.
  13. Kardono, A.Suiani, Hukum dan Lembaga Arbitrase di Indonesia, Jakarta: t.p, tt.
  14. Laurence D., Houlgate, (1967). Ignorantia Juris: A Plea For Justice, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  15. Luhmann, Niklas, (2004). Social as a Social System, New York: Oxford University Press.
  16. Marpaung, Leden, (1999)Menggapai Tertib Hukum Nasional, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika,.
  17. Mekkadilaga, (2015), Media Komunikasi dan Konsultasi Administrator Peradilan Agama, Issue IV.
  18. Mujahidin, Ahmad, (2010). Prosedur Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia, Bogor: Ghalia,.
  19. Pasaribu, (1996). Hairuman and Suhrawardi K Lubis, Hukum Perjanjian dalam Islam, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.
  20. Prabowo, Bagya Agung & Jasri Bin Jamal, (2017) Concept And Application Of Akad Wakalah In Murabaha Financing In Islamic Banking (A Comparative Study Between Indonesia And Malaysia), Diponegoro Law Review, , Volume 02, Number 01, April, p. 1-14.
  21. Prastyo, (2013). Teguh dan Abdul Halim Barkatullah, Filsafat, Teori dan Ilmu Hukum: Pemikiran Menuju Masyarakat Berkeadilan dan Bermartabat, Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
  22. Prodjodikoro, Wirjono, (1981). Asas-asas Ilmu Negara dan Politik, Bandung: PT. Eresco, 1981. Asas-asas Ilmu Negara dan Politik, Bandung: PT. Eresco.
  23. Rahardjo, Satjipto, (2006). Hukum dalam Jagad Ketertiban, Jakarta: UKI PRESS,.
  24. Rahmi, Diana, (2013). Ruang Lingkup Kewenangan Peradilan Agama Dalam Mengadili Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah, In the Sharia Journal of Law and Thought, Vol 13, No. 2.
  25. Rasyid, Roihan A., (2002). Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama, Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  26. Raz, Josept, (1980). The Concept of A Legal System, New York: Clarandom Press Oxford,.
  27. Ro’fah Setyowati, Lastuti Abubakar, Nunung Rodliah, (2017). Sharia Governance On Islamic Banking: Spiritual Rights Perspective On Consumer Protection In Indonesia, Diponegoro Law Review, April 2017, Volume 02, Number 01, p. 227-244.
  28. Rosyadi, Rahmat dan Ngatino, (2001). Arbitrase dalam Perspektif Islam dan Hukum Positif, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
  29. Salim, (2006). Hukum Kontrak: Teori dan Teknik Penyusunan Kontrak, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika,.
  30. Sumitro, Warkum, (1997). Asas-asas Perbankan Islam dan Lembaga-lembaga Terkait (BAMUI dan Takaful) di Indonesia, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada,.
  31. Surono, Agus, (2013). Fiksi Hukum dalam Pembuatan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, Jakarta: Universitas Al-Azhar Indonesia,.
  32. Training of Prospective Judges Force-2 in Banten, 2007.
  33. Umam, Khotibul, (2013). Kembalinya Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Agama, In Constitution Magazine, September Edition, No. 79.
  34. Usman, Rahmadi, (2003). Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti,.
  35. Yuliandri, (2010). Asas-asas Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan yang Baik; Gagasan Pembentukan Undang-undang Berkelanjutan, Jakarta: Rajawali Press,.