THE POSITION OF THE GUARANTOR IN RECONCILIATION ON THE BANKRUPTCY ACT ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF BANKRUPTCY IN INDONESIA

*Siti Mahmudah -  Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Siti Malikhatun Badriyah -  Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Bagus Rahmanda -  Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Published: 30 Oct 2018.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2018 Diponegoro Law Review
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Citation Format:
Abstract

The existence of the guarantor in the world of business is widely known and required in the business world. Guarantor is stipulated in the agreement of guarantor which states that the Guarantor will pay the debt of debtor to its creditor if the debtor do not pay. The debt fulfillment of debtor to creditor  can be done through the Bankruptcy Act which ended with reconciliation. The purpose of this research is to examine the position of the Guarantor in reconciliation on the Bankruptcy Act according to the Law of Bankruptcy in Indonesia, with the problem of how the position of the guarantor against debt fulfillment of debtor which ended with reconciliation in bankruptcy in Indonesia, and as a result of the approval of reconciliation in the bankruptcy of the submission of the claim the statement of bankrupt guarantor. The approach used in this research is the normative juridical, with a descriptive specifications analysis with the type of secondary data through the study of primary, secondary and tertiary legal material library which is then analyzed by qualitative research. The reconciliation that passed in bankruptcy does not always result to receivables of the creditors being paid for. Based on the provisions of Article 165 paragraph (1) Of Law No. 37 Of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligation for Payment of Debts,Guarantor will still be obligated to pay off the debtor's debts that are borne which can cause the guarantor privileged as the debtor so it can be filed for bankruptcy if fulfilled the provisions of Article 2 paragraph (1) Of Law No. 37 Of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligation for Payment of Debts.

Keywords
Guarantor, Bankruptcy, Reconciliation.

Article Metrics:

  1. Books
  2. Asikin, Zainal. 1994. Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Pembayaran di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  3. Fuady, Munir. 2005.Hukum Pailit dalam Teori dan Praktek. Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti.
  4. Ibrahim, Johnny. 2005. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Banyumedia Publishing.
  5. Jono. 2008. Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
  6. Mulyadi, Kartini dan Gunawan Widjaya. 2005.Pedoman Menangani Perkara Kepailitan. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.
  7. Sastrawidjaya, ManS.. 2010. Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.Bandung: Alumni.
  8. Shubhan, M. Hadi. 2008. Hukum Kepailitan : Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan. Jakarta: Kencana.
  9. Sidharta, Bernard Arief. 2009. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Analisis Penelitian Filosofi dan Dogmatikal. Dalam Sulistyowati Irianto dan Sidharta. Eds. Metode Penelitian Hukum Konstelasi dan Refleksi. Jakarta : Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  10. Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. 2010. Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan. Jakarta : PT PustakaUtamaGrafiti.
  11. Soemitro, Ronny Hanitijo. 1990. Metodologi Peneleitian Hukum dan Juri Metri. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia.
  12. Susilowati, Etty. 2013. Hukum Kepailitandan Penundaan Pembayaran Utang. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
  13. Wignjosoebroto, Sutandyo. 2003. Hukum: Paradigma, Metode dan Dinamika Masalahnya. Jakarta : Elsam & Huma.
  14. Regulations
  15. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata)
  16. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Dagang (KUH Dagang)
  17. Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang
  18. Undang-Undang No. 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK)