*Mohammad Saiful Islam  -  Beijing Institute of Technology, International Islamic University Chittagong (IIUC), China
Xu Xin  -  Institute for Advanced Judicial Studies (IAJS), & Professor, School of Law, Beijing Institute of Technology, China
Received: 31 Jan 2020; Published: 30 Apr 2020.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2020 Diponegoro Law Review
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Citation Format:

The idea of judicial independence and Chinese courts are the parallel subject matter of discourse among the scholars in several fields in place of either judicial independence strengthen or restricted as Chinese authority continually pushes numerous judicial reform strategy year to year. The westerns, frequently, utter China’s courts are beyond enjoying appropriate independence to decide judicial verdicts solely and independently. Conversely, the Chinese leaders enunciate they entirely extempore to swallow the Western impresses as they are a cradle of rescinding the unique Chinese features. This paper, broadly, attempts to address the design of several rounds of judicial reform policy till nowadays as a means of strengthening the independence of courts. The study catches that the Chinese authority invests rigorous reform efforts to the efficient management of court administrations; to recruit better-qualified judges; to reduce internal interference from party leaders and courts seniors. They also amended laws to progress decisional independence that will extend the Chinese judiciary closer to unaffected judicial independence. 

Keywords: Strengthen Independence, Reform Policy, Qualified Judges, Efficient Mechanisms, CCP’s Interference

Article Metrics:

  1. Aili, Wang. “China Focus: China Adopts Revised Laws on Judges, Procurators,” , (April 23, 2019).” Xinhuanet.
  2. Akkas, Sarkar Ali. Judicial Independence and Accountability: A Comparative Study Ofcontemporary Bangladesh Experience. Wollongong: University of Wollongong, 2002.
  3. Chunying, Xin. “What Kind of Judicial Power Does China Need?” International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (2003).
  4. Council, Canadian Judicial. Why Is Judicial Independence Important to You?”Judicial Independence in Canada. Canada, 2016.
  5. Council, State. “Whitepaper on Judicial Reform in China.”
  6. Feng, LIN. The Future of Judicial Independence in China. Centre for Judicial Education and Research, 2016.
  7. Ferejohn, John. “Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Explaining Judicial Independence.” Southern California Law Review 72 (1999): 355.
  8. Gechlik, Mei Ying. “Judicial Reform in China: Lessons from Shanghai.” Colum. J. Asian L 19, no. 1 (2005): 98.
  9. Hailsham, Lord. “The Independence of the Judicial Process.” Israel Law Review 13 (1978).
  10. He, Xin. “The Politics of Courts in China.” China law and society review 2 (2017): 135.
  11. Islam, M S. “Independent Judiciary: Nature and Facets from the International Context.” International Journal of Ethics in Social Sciences 6, no. 2 (2018): 15–32.
  12. Keyuan, Zou. “Judicial Reform in China: Recent Developments and Future Prospects.” Int’l L 36 (2002): 1046.
  13. L.Liebman, Benjamin. “China’s Courts: Restricted Reform.” The China Quarterly 191 (2007): 621.
  14. Larkins, Christopher M. “Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical AndConceptual Analysis.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 444 (1996): 607.
  15. MP Singh. “Securing the Independence of the Judiciary: The Indian Experience.” Indiana International Comparative Law Review 10, no. 249 (2000).
  16. Orts, Eric W. “The Rule of Law in China.” Vand. J. Transnatl. L 34 (2001): 99.
  17. Salzberger, Eli M. “A Positive Analysis of the Doctrine of Separation of Powers, or: Why Do We Have an Independent Judiciary?” International Review of Law and Economics 13, no. 4 (1993): 349–379.
  18. Shetreet, Shimon. “Judicial Independence: New Conceptual Dimensions and ContemporaryChallenges.” In Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate, 398. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1985.
  19. ———. “Judicial Independence and Accountability: Core Values in Liberaldemocracies.” In Judiciaries in Comparative Perspective, 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  20. ———. “The Administration of Justice: Practical Problems, Value Conflicts AndChanging Concepts.” University of British Columbia Law Review 13 (1979): 57.
  21. Shetreet, Shimon and Jules Deschênes. Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate. Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1985.
  22. Shihao, Hu. “Supreme Court Issues Five-Year Plan on Judicial Reform.” In Supreme People’s Court Specials, 2019.
  23. The People’s Republic of China. “Highlights of Supreme People’s Court Work Report.” Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China.
  24. ———. “Highlights of Work Report of China’s Supreme People’s Court 2014.” Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China.
  25. ———. Judges Law of the People’s Republic of China Amended on April 23, 2019, 2019.
  26. ———. “Notice of the Supreme People’s Court on Issuing the Third Five-Year Reform Outline for the People’s Courts (2009-2013).” Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China.
  27. ———. “Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on Comprehensively Deepening the Reform of the People’s Court: Outline of the Fourth Five-Year Reform of the People’s Court (2014-2018).” Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China.
  28. ———. “Second Five Year Reform Program for the People’s Courts (2004-2008).” Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China.
  29. ———. “SPC’s White Paper Remarks, the Direct Adjudication by a Sole Judge or a Panel in the Shanghai Courts Reach 99.9 per Cent, and Only 0.1 per Cent Referred to the Discussion by the Adjudication Committee.” Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China.
  30. ———. “Supreme Court Issues Five-Year Plan on Judicial Reform : Highlights of 2019 SPC Two Sessions (Hereinafter SPC Latest Five-Year Plan).” Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China.
  31. ———. The Five-Year Program for Reform of the People’s Courts. Gazette of the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China. Gazette of the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China, 1999.
  32. ———. “The Intermediary People’s Court of Yinchuan, Capital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Is One of the Courts That Promoted the Invitation to Attend People in Court Hearings.” Chinese Courts Invite Citizens to Courtrooms.
  33. ———. The People’s Republic of China Governs the Country According to Law and Makes It a Socialist Country under Rule of Law, Chapter I, Article 5, Section 1 of The Constitution of the People’s Republic of China, 1982.
  34. ———. “The Second Five-Year Reform Plan of the People’s Courts (2004-2008).” Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China.
  35. ———. “The Supreme People’s Court Issues Its Newest Five-Year Reform Plan for the Courts.” Supreme People’s Court Monitor.
  36. ———. “Whitepaper on Court Reform in China.” Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China.
  37. ———. “Whitepaper on Judicial Reform of Chinese Courts.” Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China.
  38. The People’s Republic of China, State Council. “White Paper: Judicial Reform in China, Information Office of the State Council.” Information Office of the State Council.
  39. Wang, Yifan; Sarah Biddulph and Andrew Godwin. A Brief Introduction to the Chinese Judicial System and Court Hierarchy. Melbourne: Melbourne Asian Law Centre, Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, 2017.
  40. Woo, Margaret YK. “Court Reform with Chinese Characteristics.” WASH. INT’L L.J. 27, no. 1 (2017): 247.
  41. Xinhua. Highlights of China’s Judicial Reform Progress in 2018. Xinhuanet, 2019.
  42. Yanrong, ZHAO. “The Way to Understand the Nature and Extent of Judicial Independence in China.” Asian Journal of Law and Society (2018): 3.
  43. Yu, Meng and Guodong Du. “Courts in China’s Judicial Reform (The Third-Round Judicial Reform During 2014-2017).” China Justice Observer (2018).