DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.6.1.2021.108-122

LEGITIMIZATION OF JERUSALEM EMBASSY ACT ACCORDING TO INTERNATIONAL LAW

*Riktin Noviani  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Garry Gumelar Pratama  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Jerusalem is a special entity under the administrative power of United Nations according to United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181, where Jerusalem does not fall under the sovereignty of any state. Jerusalem Embassy Act is the public law of United States which recognized Jerusalem as the capital city of Israel by establishing a diplomatic mission in the city.This paper concludes that Jerusalem Embassy Act is illegitimate according to international law. It turns its back to international obligation under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961 and UN resolutions.Thus, the Jerusalem Embassy Act has to be pulled back by the US parliament in order to maintain international peace and security, bearing in mind the ongoing dispute between Palestine and Israel.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Jerusalem; Jerusalem Embassy Act; International Diplomatic Law; Corpus Separatum

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
LEGITIMIZATION OF JERUSALEM EMBASSY ACT ACCORDING TO INTERNATIONAL LAW PAKISTAN-INDIA CONFLICT AND THE RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION OF KASHMIR THE LEGAL ISSUES OF CASH WAQF IN CENTRAL JAVA, INDONESIA More recent articles
Most cited articles
SHARIA GOVERNANCE ON ISLAMIC BANKING: SPIRITUAL RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE ON CONSUMER PROTECTION IN INDONESIA DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGES OF INDONESIA IN THE SOCIAL MEDIA ERA MANAGEMENT, DISTRIBUTION, AND REDEMPTION OF VILLAGE FUND IMPLEMENTATION OF LEGAL PROTECTION BY THE GOVERNMENT IN ORDER TO EMPOWERMENT OF MICRO SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISE TO REALIZE THE JUSTICE ECONOMY (Research Study: The Office of Cooperative and Micro Small and Medium Enterprise Province of Central Java) REGULATIONS FOR E-COMMERCE AGREEMENT ACCORDING TO ICT ACT AND TITLE III OF INDONESIAN CIVIL CODE More cited articles
  1. Abdelrazek, Adnan. “A UN Perspective on the Status of Jerusalem.” Palestine-Israel Journal on Politics, Economics, and Culture 17, no. 1 (2011): 160
  2. Ben-Dror, Elad. “The United Nations Plan to Establish an Armed Jewish Force to Implement the Partition Plan (United Nations Resolution 181).” Diplomacy & Statecraft 24, no. 3 (2013): 559–78
  3. Borda, A. Z. “A Formal Approach to Article 38(1)(D) of the ICJ Statute from the Perspective of the International Criminal Courts and Tribunals. European Journal of International Law” 24, no. 2 (2008): 649–61
  4. Brownlie, Ian. Principles of Public International Law. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990
  5. Cattan, Henry. “The Status of Jerusalem Under International Law and United Nations Resolutions.” Journal of Palestine Studies 10, no. 3 (1981): 3
  6. Cohen, Michael J. The Origins and Evolution of the Arab-Zionist Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987
  7. Denza, Eileen. Diplomatic Law: Commentary on the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016
  8. Dugard, John; Reynolds, John. “Apartheid, International Law, and the Occupied Palestinian Territory.” European Journal of International Law 24, no. 3 (2013): 867–913
  9. Eliav, Yaron Z. God’s Mountain: The Temple Mount in Time, Place, and Memory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009
  10. Political Geography Now. “Explainer: Is Jerusalem the Capital of Israel or Not?,” 2017
  11. Gore-Booth, Lord. Satow’s Guide to Diplomatic Practice Fifth Edition. New York: Longman Publishing Group, 1979
  12. I.C.J. Reports. “Colombian-Peruvian Asylum Case, Judgment of November 20th 1950,” 1950
  13. ———. “Fisheries Case, Judgment of December 18th, 1951,” 1951
  14. ———. “Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion,” 1996
  15. ———. “Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Merits, Judgment,” 1986
  16. Isaac, Jad, and Suhali Khalilieh. “The Jerusalem Saga: Current Realities in Jerusalem.” Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics, and Culture 17, no. 1 (2011): 109
  17. Khalidi, Walid. “The Ownership of the U.S. Embassy Site in Jerusalem.” Journal of Palestine Studies 29, no. 4 (2000): 81
  18. Kramer, Martin. “The Forgotten Truth About The Balfour Declaration.” Mosaic Magazine, June 2017
  19. Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar, and Etty R. Agoes. Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Bandung: Alumni, 2003
  20. Lau, Holning. “Rethinking the Persistent Objector Doctrine in International Human Rights Law.” Chicago Journal of International Law 6, no. 1 (2005): 495
  21. Mandel, N. J. “Ottoman Policy and Restrictions on Jewish Settlement in Palestine: 1881–1908—Part I.” Middle Eastern Studies 10, no. 3 (1974): 312–32
  22. Mauna, Boer. Hukum Internasional: Pengertian, Peranan Dan Fungsi Dalam Era Dinamika Global. Bandung: Alumni, 2003
  23. Moten, Abdul Rashid. “US Embassy in Jerusalem: Reasons, Implications and Consequences.” Intellectual Discourse 26, no. 1 (2018): 9
  24. Öberg, Marko Divac. “The Legal Effects of Resolutions of the UN Security Council and General Assembly in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ.” The European Journal of International Law 15, no. 5 (2006)
  25. Parisi, Fransesco. “Spontaneous Emergence of Law: Customary Law.” Encyclopedia of Law & Economics 5 (2000): 604
  26. Situni, F.A. Whisnu. Identifikasi Dan Reformulasi Sumber-Sumber Hukum Internasional. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 1989
  27. Susser, Asher. “The Historical Linkage: Israel’s Legitimacy and the Idea of Partition.” Israel Studies 23, no. 3 (2018): 219
  28. Trachtman, Joel P. “Persistent Objectors, Cooperation, and the Utility of Customary International Law.” Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 21 (2010)
  29. U.S. Department of State. “Opening of U.S. Embassy Jerusalem.” U.S. Department of State, 2018
  30. Watson, Geoffrey R. “The Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995.” Catholic University Law Review 45, no. 3 (1996): 837

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-06 08:17:31

No citation recorded.