DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.6.2.2021.217-230

SAFEGUARD RE-INVESTIGATION BY MADAGASCAR GOVERNMENT ON PASTA PRODUCTS FROM INDONESIA BASED ON GATT/WTO FRAMEWORK

*Tirza Gracia Shekinah Hutagaol  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
FX. Joko Priyono scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Nanik Trihastuti scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Due to the increase of import in the last 4 years, Madagascar investigated imported pastain October 2018, terminated it on July 10, 2019, and reinvestigated it on July 18, 2019. They were followed with Provisional Safeguard Measures(PSM). This study aimed to know whether Madagascar had been fulfilling the elements of Article XIX GATT in the preliminary determination of investigation and whether a safeguard reinvestigation is in accordance with the GATT/WTO. Researchers used a juridical normative approach. The result showed that serious injuries and causal links from Article XIX GATT were undetermined in the preliminary determination. Neither the GATT nor Agreement on Safeguard (SA) were not regulating safeguard reinvestigation, so it can proceed but without PSM in the second investigation, because it violated the provisions of Article 6 SA.Madagascar shall immediately completing the elements that had not been determined and revoke the PSM in the second investigation.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Safeguards; Re-Investigation; Madagascar; Pasta Products; Indonesia

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
INCONSISTENCIES IN ICSID AWARDS ON DISPUTES RELATED TO MFN AND UMBRELLA CLAUSE CRITICAL EXAMINATION ON THE MECHANISM OF APPLICATION SUBMISSION FOR LEGAL ASSISTANCE BUDGETING IN INDUSTRIAL RELATION DISPUTES KNOWING COMPANY SECRETS THROUGH EMPLOYEE POSTS ON SOCIAL MEDIA More recent articles
Most cited articles
DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGES OF INDONESIA IN THE SOCIAL MEDIA ERA PROTECTION AND REHABILITATION FOR WOMEN VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE ACCORDING TO INDONESIAN LAW (STUDY ON CENTRAL JAVA GOVERNMENT'S HANDLING THROUGH KPK2BGA) Index IMPLEMENTATION OF LEGAL PROTECTION BY THE GOVERNMENT IN ORDER TO EMPOWERMENT OF MICRO SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISE TO REALIZE THE JUSTICE ECONOMY (Research Study: The Office of Cooperative and Micro Small and Medium Enterprise Province of Central Java) LEGAL PERSPECTIVE ON ASEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY More cited articles
  1. Adine, Mevy ; Siti Mahmudah and FX. Joko Priyono. “Tindakan Pengamanan Perdagangan Terhadap Kain Tenun Dari Kapas Dan Benang Kapas Sebagai Akibat Peningkatan Volume Impor Tekstil.” Diponegoro Law Review 5, no. 2 (2016): 1–14
  2. Adolf, Huala. Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006
  3. Ahn, Dukgeun. Restructuring The WTO Safeguard System, The WTO Trade Remedy System: East Asian Perspectives. London: Cameron May, 2006
  4. Baldwin, Robert E. ; Jeffrey W. Stagall. “An Analysis of ITC Decisions in Antidumping, Countervailing Duty and Safeguard Cases.” Weltwitschafliches Archiv 130, no. 20 (1994): 290–308
  5. Barutu, Christhophorus. Ketentuan Antidumping, Subsidi, Dan Tindakan Pengamanan (Safeguard) Dalam GATT Dan WTO. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007
  6. Bown, Chad P. ; Mark Wu. “Safeguards and the Perils of Preferential Trade Agreements: Dominican Republic-Safeguard Measure.” World Trade Review 13, no. 2 (2014): 179–227
  7. Dimyati, Khudzaifah. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Surakarta: Fakultas Hukum UMS, 2004
  8. Grossman, Gene M. ; Petros C. Mavroidis. “United States – Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Circular Welded Carbon Quality Line Pipe From Korea Not for Attribution.” World Trade Review 4, no. S1 (2005): 99–132
  9. International Monetary Fund. “Report for Selected Countries and Subjects.” International Monetary Fund, 2019
  10. Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. “ITC Calculations Based on UN COMTRADE Statistics.” Jakarta, 2019
  11. ———. “Statistics Indonesia.” Jakarta, 2019
  12. Komisi Pengamanan Perdagangan Indonesia. “Laporan Akhir Hasil Penyelidikan Tindakan Pengamanan Perdagangan Terhadap Impor Barang.” Komisi Pengamanan Perdagangan Indonesia, 2019
  13. Madagascar. “Notificationon WTO, G/SG/N/8/MDG/1/Suppl.1, G/SG/N/10/MDG/1/Suppl.1, Dan G/SG/N/11/MDG/1/Suppl.3,” n.d
  14. Mertokusumo, Sudikno, and A. Pitlo. Bab-Bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1993
  15. Olsson, Carl-Owe. “Developing Countries and Emergency Safeguards Measures in World Trade Law.” University of Lund, 2006
  16. Pelc, Krzysztof J. “Seeking Escape: The Use of Escape Clauses in International Trade Agreements.” International Studies Quarterly 53, no. 2 (2009): 349–368
  17. Raychaudhuri, Tilottama. “The Unforeseen Developments Clause in Safeguards under the WTO: Confusions in Compliance.” The Estey Centre Journal of Intrnational Law and Trade Policy 11, no. 1 (2010): 302–20
  18. Vermulst, Edwin ; Marta Pernaute and Krista Lucenti. “Recent European Community Safeguards Policy: Kill Them All and Let God Sort Them Out.” Journal of World Trade 38, no. 6 (2004): 955–84
  19. World Trade Organization. “Notification on WTO No. G/SG/N/7/MDG/4.” World Trade Organization, 2019

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-07-17 08:28:24

No citation recorded.