BibTex Citation Data :
@article{Dilrev44534, author = {Zaid Zaid}, title = {SHOULD THE VIOLATORS OF MANDATORY COVID-19 VACCINATION BE PUNISHED IN INDONESIA?: HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE}, journal = {Diponegoro Law Review}, volume = {8}, number = {2}, year = {2023}, keywords = {Covid-19; Mandatory Vaccination; Human Rights; Sanction; Punishment}, abstract = { This study explores human rights perspectives on Indonesia's mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy, particularly examining the associated penalties for non-compliance. This research is applying a normative methods and descriptive analysis of secondary data, utilizing conceptual and legal approaches, the research identifies complexities inherent in implementing mandatory vaccination policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study reveals diverse viewpoints, conflicting interests, and considerations of pros and cons surrounding policy enforcement and penalties. However,it concludes that the mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy and its associated sanctions are legitimate from a human rights standpoint. The primary reason to protect others by reducing transmission and the health threat has become a main objective and solid justification behind it. Nonetheless, human rights still do not approve the types of punishment that damage a person's physical health or cause mental or psychological harm and damage or reduce rights that cannot be diminished fundamental rights. It urges the importance of ensuring that any penalties imposed are proportionate, respect human dignity, and do not unjustly curtail rights that are inviolable. Thus, while acknowledging the legitimacy of the mandatory vaccination policy and advocates for careful consideration of human rights principles in the formulation and implementation of penalties associated with it. }, issn = {2527-4031}, pages = {243--259} doi = {10.14710/dilrev.8.2.2023.243-259}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/44534} }
Refworks Citation Data :
This study explores human rights perspectives on Indonesia's mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy, particularly examining the associated penalties for non-compliance. This research is applying a normative methods and descriptive analysis of secondary data, utilizing conceptual and legal approaches, the research identifies complexities inherent in implementing mandatory vaccination policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study reveals diverse viewpoints, conflicting interests, and considerations of pros and cons surrounding policy enforcement and penalties. However,it concludes that the mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy and its associated sanctions are legitimate from a human rights standpoint. The primary reason to protect others by reducing transmission and the health threat has become a main objective and solid justification behind it. Nonetheless, human rights still do not approve the types of punishment that damage a person's physical health or cause mental or psychological harm and damage or reduce rights that cannot be diminished fundamental rights. It urges the importance of ensuring that any penalties imposed are proportionate, respect human dignity, and do not unjustly curtail rights that are inviolable. Thus, while acknowledging the legitimacy of the mandatory vaccination policy and advocates for careful consideration of human rights principles in the formulation and implementation of penalties associated with it.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2024-11-23 11:38:57
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Diponegoro Law Review journal (Dilrev) and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Diponegoro Law Review journal and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Dilrev journal are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro
Gedung Satjipto Rahardjo - Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH. Tembalang-Semarang
dilrev@live.undip.ac.id
http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr
024 - 76918201 / 024 - 76918206 (fax)
Diponegoro Law Review (DILREV, e-ISSN : 2527-4031) published by Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro - in collaboration with Asosiasi Pengajar dan Peneliti Hukum Ekonomi Islam Indonesia (APPHEISI) and Asosiasi Sosiologi Hukum Indonesia (ASHI) - under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
e-ISSN : 2527-4031