DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.8.1.2023.107-123

IMPLEMENTATION OF SIMPLE, FAST AND LOW-COST PRINCIPLES IN E-SUMMONS WITH THE E-COURT SYSTEM

*Dian Latifiani orcid scopus publons  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Yusriyadi Yusriyadi orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Agus Sarono orcid  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Esmi Warassih Pudjirahayu scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Suryo Adi Widigdo  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Nur Arif Nugraha  -  University of Sussex, United Kingdom
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Courts are expected to provide various advantages, namely speed, consistency, accuracy, and reliability. The judiciary in Indonesia adheres to a simple, fast, and low-cost trial. The reality in Indonesia is that case resolution is long-winded, expensive, and inefficient. The existence of technological developments brings benefits, especially in the world of justice where the judicial system that was originally based on conventional has shifted to an electronic-based justice system from then a new problem arose. E-Summon, which should make it easier to call parties, does not apply to people who are not familiar with technology. E-Summon is considered ineffective because the e-court system sometimes has errors and is considered long-winded because justice seekers who are not yet technologically savvy are required to have an email, be able to operate it, and must be ready if they get a call. This study examines how to optimize the E-Summons feature in realizing a simple, fast, and inexpensive E-Summons system. settlement of civil cases. The results show that the implementation of E-Summons has not been able to run optimally. The not yet optimal implementation of E-Summons is caused by the legal culture of the community that has not been able to accommodate the implementation of E-Summons. The legal culture of the people who are not used to operating e-mail and the lack of openness of technological insight which is the main capital in the implementation of E-Summons, the implementation of E-Summons has not run optimally.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: E-court; Simple Fast and Low Cost; E-Summons

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
SAFEGUARDING CONSUMER RIGHTS: ENHANCING LEGAL PROTECTION AGAINST UNLABELED FOOD PRODUCTS DISTRIBUTION OF ZAKAT FOR CORRECTIONAL INMATES AS AZNAF RIQAB AT BAZNAS OF BARRU DISTRICT RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF FOREIGN SHIPS TO INDONESIAN ARCHIPELAGIC SEA LANES PASSAGE More recent articles
Most cited articles
THE FUNCTION OF IDEAL LAW IN PREPARATION REGULATION LEGISLATION IN ORDER TO CREATING EQUITABLE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BRIDGING THE GAPS : A PARADIGMATIC INSIGHT INTO PHILOSOPHY OF LAW MANAGEMENT, DISTRIBUTION, AND REDEMPTION OF VILLAGE FUND RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE PROVISION OF PEOPLE’S BUSINESS CREDIT AS IMPLEMENTATION OF PRUDENTIAL PRINCIPLES DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGES OF INDONESIA IN THE SOCIAL MEDIA ERA More cited articles
  1. Adi, Luthfi Kalbu, and Yusuf Saefudin. “Modernisasi Layanan Dan Administrasi Peradilan Di Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto : Permasalahan Dan Upaya Perbaikannya.” In Prosiding Integritas, 53–64, 2020
  2. Ali, Achmad. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence). Jakarta: Kencana, 2012
  3. Ansori, Lutfil. “Reformasi Penegakan Hukum Perspektif Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Yuridis 4, no. 2 (2017): 148–63
  4. Arikunto, Suharsini. Prosedur Penelitiaan Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2012
  5. Bintoro, Rahadi Wasi, Antonius Sidik Maryono, and Lidang Sinta Mutiara. “Perbandingan E-Court Dan Sidang Konvensional Dalam Mewujudkan Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan.” In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengembangan Sumber Daya Perdesaan Dan Kearifan Lokal Berkelanjutan X, 340–46, 2020
  6. Fikry, Ahmad Habib Al, Muhammad Riyan Afandi, and Dian Latifiani. “National Law Development through Civil Procedure Law Reform as a Manifestation of State Goals during the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Lex Scientia Law Review 5, no. 2 (2021): 41–64. doi: 10.15294/lesrev.v5i2.50483
  7. Hairi, P. J. “Antara Prinsip Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat Dan Berbiaya Ringan Dan Gagasan Pembatasan Perkara Kasasi.” Jurnal Negara Hukum 2, no. 1 (2011): 151–78
  8. Hakim, Faisal Luqman. “Simplifikasi Prosedur Beracara Dengan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata.” Adhaper: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 5, no. 1 (2019): 1–17. doi: 10.36913/jhaper.v5i1.85
  9. Hayati, Rakyu Swarnabumi R. Rosady, and Mulida Hayati. “Sistem E-Court Dalam Pelaksanaan Peradilan Di Indonesia Pada Masa Pandemi Covid - 19.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai 6, no. 2 (2021): 125–43
  10. Hidayat, Khotib Iqbal, Aris Priyadi, and Elly Kristiani Purwendah. “Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) Dan Konvensional.” Batulis Civil Law Review 1, no. 1 (2020): 14–23. doi: 10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421
  11. Hutomo, Priyo. “Perspektif Teori Sistem Hukum Dalam Pembaharuan Pengaturan Sistem Pemasyarakatan Militer.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundang-Undangan 1, no. 1 (2021): 46–68
  12. Ilham, Maya Hildawati. “Kajian Atas Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana, Dan Biaya Ringan Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Pencari Keadilan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 246 K/Pid/2017).” Jurnal Verstek 7, no. 3 (2017): 212–19
  13. Iqbal, Muhammad, and Moh. Sutoro. “Efektifitas Sistem Administrasi E-Court Dalam Upaya Mendukung Proses Administrasi Cepat, Sederhana, Dan Biaya Ringan Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Hukum 8, no. 2 (2019): 302–15
  14. Jainah, Zainah Ompu. “Membangun Budaya Hukum Masyarakat Penegak Hukum Dalam Pemberantasan Tidak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Tentang Lahirnya Badan Narkotika Nasional).” Jurnal Keadilan Progresif 2, no. 2 (2011): 123–36
  15. Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State, Diterjemahkan Oleh Rasisul Muttaqien. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2011
  16. Kurniawan, M Beni. “Implementation of ELectronic Trial (E-Litigation) on the Civil Cases in Indonesia Court as a Legal Renewal of Civil Procedural Law.” Hukum Dan Peradilan 9, no. 1 (2020): 43–70. doi: 10.25216/JHP.9.1.2020.43-70
  17. Latifiani, Dian. Buku Monograf Budaya Hukum E-Court Masyarakat Desa. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang, 2020
  18. ———. “Civil Rights Conservation of Female Correctional Facility Inmates in Semarang” 192, no. Icils (2018): 194–97. doi: 10.2991/icils-18.2018.37
  19. ———. “Human Attitude and Technology: Analyzing A Legal Culture On Electronic Court System in Indonesia (Case of Religious Court).” Jurnal of Indonesian Legal Studies 6, no. 1 (2021): 157–84
  20. Latifiani, Dian, and Raden Muhammad Arvy Ilyasa. “The Position of Moral Values in Law.” Diponegoro Law Review 6, no. 1 (2021): 51–61. doi: 10.14710/dilrev.6.1.2021.51-61
  21. Latifiani, Dian, and Mitha Ratnasari. “The Small Claim Court To Realize the Fast and Simple Principle in Civil Disputes Resolution.” South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law 18, no. 4 (2019)
  22. Latifiani, Dian, Anis Widyawati, Nurul Fibrianti, and Ayup Suran Ningsih. “Advocate as Law Enforcer in the Implementation of E-Court.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 11, no. 4 (2020): 439–49. https://www.ijicc.net/images/vol11iss4/11436_Latifiani_2020_E_R.pdf
  23. Lutfia, Vivi. “Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Peradilan Melalui E-Court Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Bagi Masyarakat Di Era Digitalisasi.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 6, no. 4 (2021): 677–91. doi: 10.20885/jlr.vol6.iss4.art3
  24. Mahanani, Anajeng Esri Edhi. “Rekonstruksi Budaya Hukum Berdimensi Pancasila.” Jurnal Yustika 22, no. 2 (2019): 1–10
  25. Nasir, Gamal Abdul. “Kekosongan Hukum & Percepatan Perkembangan Masyarakat.” Jurnal Hukum Replik 5, no. 2 (2017): 172–83
  26. Nugroho, Dewi Rahmaningsih, and Suteki Suteki. “Membangun Budaya Hukum Persidangan Virtual (Studi Perkembangan Sidang Tindak Pidana via Telekonferensi).” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 3 (2020): 291–304. doi: 10.14710/jphi.v2i3.291-304
  27. Retnaningsih, Sonyendah, Disriani Latifah Soroinda Nasution, Rouli Anita Velentina, and Kelly Manthovani. “Pelaksanaan E-Court Menurut Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik Dan E-Litigation Menurut Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Dan Persidangan Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (Studi Di Peng.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 50, no. 1 (2020): 124–44. doi: 10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2486
  28. Sajidin, Syahrul. “Urgensi Penyederhanaan Agenda Sidang Pada Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia.” Adhaper: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 4, no. 2 (2018): 21–41
  29. Saman, Wan, and Abrar Haider. “Electronic Court Records Management: A Case Study.” Journal of E-Government Studies and Best Practices 2012 (2012): 1–11. doi: 10.5171/2012.925115
  30. Saman, Wan Satirah Wan Mohd, and Abrar Haider. “E-Court: Technology Diffusion in Court Management.” In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2:1–10, 2013
  31. Setiawan, Annisa Dita, Artaji, and Sherly Ayuna Putri. “Impelementasi Sistem E-Court Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Pengadilan Negeri.” Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjajaran 2, no. 2 (2021): 198–217
  32. Sriwidodo, Joko. “Perkembangan Regulasi Dan Urgensi E-Litigasi Di Era Pandemi Corona Virus Disease-19 Joko.” Kertha Patrika 43, no. 2 (2021): 197–209. doi: 10.35817/jpu.v3i2.12535
  33. Suadi, H. Amran. Pembaruan Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2019
  34. Sudjana. “Sistem Hukum Menurut Lawrence Friedman Terhadap Efektivitas Perlindungan Desain Tata Letak Sirkuit Terpadu Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2000.” Al Amwal 2, no. 1 (2019): 82
  35. Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Buku Panduan E Court. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung, 2019
  36. ———. “Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Dan Persidangan Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik.” Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung, 2019
  37. ———. “Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik.” Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung, 2018
  38. Susanto, Muhamad Iqbal, and Wawan Supriyatna. “Menciptakan Sistem Peradilan Efisien Dengan Sistem E-Court Pada Pengadilan Negeri Dan Pengadilan Agama Se-Tangerang Raya.” JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) 6, no. 1 (2020): 104–16. doi: 10.33760/jch.v6i1.287
  39. Sutiyoso, Bambang. Reformasi Keadilan Dan Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2010
  40. Triana, Angreani, and Taun. “Efektivitas Implementasi E-Court Sebagai Perwujudan Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana Dan Biaya Ringan Di Pengadilan Negeri Karawang.” Jurnal Kertha Semaya 9, no. 7 (2021)
  41. Ulfiah, Siti Amatil, Vena Lidya Khairunissa, and Dian Latifiani. “Urgensi Pelaksanaan E-Litigasi Dalam Persidangan Perkara Perdata Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19.” Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu: Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan 12, no. 2 (2021): 150–62
  42. Ungaran, PN. “Laporan Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Tahun 2019 Pengadilan Negeri Ungaran,” 2019
  43. PN Ungaran. “Laporan Kegiatan Tahun 2020,” 2020. https://medium.com/@arifwicaksanaa/pengertian-use-case-a7e576e1b6bf
  44. ———. “Laporan Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Tahun 2021,” 2021
  45. Widowati. “Hambatan Dalam Implementasi Asas Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan.” Jurnal Hukum - Yustitiabelen 7, no. 1 (2021): 94–114

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-07-02 18:46:18

No citation recorded.