DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.9.1.2024.136-152

CRITIQUING DELEGATED LEGISLATION ON PREVENTING SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN IN INDIAN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

*Arrie Budhiartie orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
David Pradhan orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Business & Humanities, Nusa Putra University, Indonesia
Arti Devi orcid  -  School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, India
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Sexual harassment of women in the workplace is a serious issue in India, affecting all social and professional sectors, including elite higher education institutions. This problem violates women's fundamental rights to equality and livelihood, breaches professional ethics, and hampers the productivity and potential of many academics. Although the Indian Parliament enacted a comprehensive law in 2013 to address sexual harassment at workplaces, the implementation, especially in educational institutions, is flawed due to bureaucratic inefficiencies. There is a lack of unbiased analysis on how delegated regulations by administrative authorities undermine the law's intent. This research article conducts a legal analysis of the law's implementation in higher educational institutions, using doctrinal research methodology. It identifies subjective and ultra vires provisions introduced by ideologically driven bureaucrats that compromise the law's validity and effectiveness. The study highlights deviations in delegated legislation from the original law and suggests corrective measures to address significant flaws in the regulations framed by the University Grants Commission.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Sexual Harassment; Women; Delegated Legislation; India; Higher Educational Institutions

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
TRANSFER OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT AS A COMPANY ASSET IN BANKRUPTCY IN INDONESIA CRITIQUING DELEGATED LEGISLATION ON PREVENTING SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN IN INDIAN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS REDEFINING INDONESIA’S BLASPHEMY LAW IN THE DIGITAL AGE: A HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE More recent articles
Most cited articles
MANAGEMENT, DISTRIBUTION, AND REDEMPTION OF VILLAGE FUND JUSTICE A YEARNING IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE SOCIETY LEGAL PERSPECTIVE ON ASEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY PROTECTION AND REHABILITATION FOR WOMEN VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE ACCORDING TO INDONESIAN LAW (STUDY ON CENTRAL JAVA GOVERNMENT'S HANDLING THROUGH KPK2BGA) BRIDGING THE GAPS : A PARADIGMATIC INSIGHT INTO PHILOSOPHY OF LAW More cited articles
  1. Aina, A.D., Kulshrestha, P. “Sexual Harassment in Educational Institutions in Delh’ NCR (India): Level of Awareness, Perception and Experience.” Sexuality & Culture, 22, 106–126 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9455-5
  2. Chandpuri, JS, and Vivek Kumar. “Emerging Trends in Law of Torts: An Overview.” International Journal of Law Management & Humanities 5, no. 2 (2022): 1178–95. https://doi.org/10.10000/IJLMH.112919
  3. Chopra, Radhika. “Three Texts, One Issue Vishaka and Others vs State of Rajasthan and Others, Judgement Dated 13 August 1997. Scale, Vol. 5, 1997. Benokraitis, Nijole, V. (Ed.), Subtle Sexism: Current Practice and Prospects for Change, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 1997. Sexual Harassment in Delhi University: A Report. Gender Study Group, Delhi, 1996.” Indian Journal of Gender Studies 5, no. 1 (March 1, 1998): 116–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/097152159800500109
  4. Craig, Paul. “Ultra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review.” The Cambridge Law Journal 57, no. 1 (1998): 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300134397
  5. Dam, Shubhankar. “Lawmaking Beyond Lawmakers: The Little Right and the Great Wrong.” Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 13, no. 1 (2005): 109–40
  6. Degol, Aron, and Abdulatif Kedir. “Administrative Rulemaking in Ethiopia: Normative and Institutional Framework.” Mizan Law Review 7, no. 1 (February 4, 2014): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v7i1.1
  7. Dodeja, Karishma D. “Belling the Cat: The Curious Case of the Ninth Schedule in the Indian Constitution.” National Law School of India Review 28, no. 1 (2016): 1–17
  8. Duff, Patrick W, and Horace E Whiteside. “Delegata Potestas Non Potest Delegari A Maxim of American Constitutional Law.” Cornell Law Review 14, no. 2 (1929): 168–96
  9. Elliott, Mark. “The Ultra Vires Doctrine in a Constitutional Setting: Still the Central Principle of Administrative Law.” The Cambridge Law Journal 58, no. 1 (1999): 129–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197399001075
  10. Gan, Ching Chuan. “The Ultra Vires Doctrine In Administrative Law: A Malaysian Perspective.” Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law 19 (1992): 125–60
  11. González, M Aránzazu Calzada. “El Principio Ei Incumbit Probatio Qui Dicit, Non Qui Negat Y Su Recepción En Les Furs De Valencia Y En Les Costums De Tortosa,” 109–20. Servicio de Publicaciones, 2000. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=303908
  12. Hendel, Samuel. Charles Evans Hughes and the Supreme Court. Columbia University Press, 1951. https://doi.org/10.7312/hend90602
  13. Hoffman, Shekinah. “The Impact of Sexual Harassment on Women’s Health and Well-Being: A Case for Studying the Casino Gaming Industry.” Sociology Compass 18, no. 1 (January 1, 2024): e13163. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13163
  14. Howard A. Street, A Treatise on the Doctrine of Ultra Vires (London: Sweet & Maxwell Limited, 1930)
  15. Huq, Aziz Z, and Jon D Michaels. “The Cycles of Separation-of-Powers Jurisprudence.” The Yale Law Journal 126, no. 2 (2016): 346–437
  16. Jain, Abhishek, and Varinder Kaur. "Census Mapping in India and Role of GIS: A Look Ahead at Census 2021." Indian Journal of Public Administration, 67.4 (2021): 540-558. https://doi.org/10.1177/00195561211056406
  17. Jaising, Indira. “Eliminating Sexual Harassment at the Workplace: Broadening the Discourse on Gender Equality.” Commonwealth Law Bulletin 40, no. 2 (April 3, 2014): 375–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2014.909127
  18. Littlejohn, Clayton. "Truth, knowledge, and the standard of proof in criminal law." Synthese, 197.12 (2020): 5253-5286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1608-4
  19. Keyton, Joann, and Steven C. Rhodes. “Sexual Harassment: A Matter of Individual Ethics, Legal Definitions, or Organizational Policy?” Journal of Business Ethics 16, no. 2 (February 1, 1997): 129–46. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017905100869
  20. M.A.Fazal, Judicial Control of Administrative Action in India and Pakistan: A Comparative Study Of Principles And Remedies (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969)
  21. Mahender P. Jain and S.N.Jain, Principles of Administrative Law (Bombay: N.M.Tripathi, 1970)
  22. McLaughlin, Heather, Christopher Uggen, and Amy Blackstone. “The Economic and Career Effects of Sexual Harassment on Working Women.” Gender & Society 31, no. 3 (June 1, 2017): 333–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217704631
  23. Mehta, Megha. “The Inefficacy of Internal Complaint Mechanisms in Resolving Sexual Harassment Claims-Astudy in the Context of Sexual Harassment Law And# Metoo in India.” NUJS Law Review 14, no. 3 (2021): 412–69
  24. Nielsen, Maj Britt D., Susie Kjær, Per T. Aldrich, Ida. E.H. Madsen, Maria K. Friborg, Reiner Rugulies, and Anna P. Folker. “Sexual Harassment in Care Work – Dilemmas and Consequences: A Qualitative Investigation.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 70 (May 1, 2017): 122–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.018
  25. Patel, Vibhuti. “Sexual Harassment at the Workplace.” Urban Women in Contemporary India: A Reader. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi and Singapore: Sage, 2007, 109–17
  26. Pathak, Gaurav. “Legal Regime for the Protection of Cultural Heritage in India.” Gdańskie Studia Azji Wschodniej 22 (2022): 169–82
  27. R. Wilson, B. Galpin, and P. B Maxwell, Maxwell on The Interpretation of Statutes (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1962)
  28. Rakshit, Nirmalendu Bikash. “Right to Constitutional Remedy: Significance of Article 32.” Economic and Political Weekly 34, no. 34/35 (1999): 2379–81
  29. Reddy, O. Chinnappa. “The State, Its Instrumentalities and Agencies.” In The Court and the Constitution of India: Summit and Shallows, edited by O. Chinnappa Reddy, 0. Oxford University Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198066286.003.0029
  30. Sandra Lee Bartky, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression (New York: Routledge, 1990)
  31. Schwartz, Bernard. “Administrative Finality in Britain.” The Canadian Bar Review 26, no. 7 (1948). https://cbr.cba.org/index.php/cbr/article/view/1534
  32. Shakthi, S. “The Law, the Market, the Gendered Subject: Workplace Sexual Harassment in Chennai’s Information Technology Industry.” Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 27.1 (2020): 34-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2019.1608912
  33. Silvia Zorzetto, ‘Normative Legal Positivism: From Metaphysics to Politics’, Isonomia, 24.1 (2021), 139–66. https://doi.org/10.5347/isonomia.v0i54.463
  34. T Hutchinson, ‘Doctrinal Research’ in Research Methodology in Law, (New York: Routledge, 2013)
  35. Wikström, Malin Christina. “Gendered Bodies and Power Dynamics: The Relation between Toxic Masculinity and Sexual Harassment.” Interdisciplinary Journal, Volume 3.2 (2019): 28-33

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-24 15:16:13

No citation recorded.