DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.11.1.2026.94-110

MEDIA BLACKOUT IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: HOW SHOULD IT BE FORMULATED?

*Peter Jeremiah Setiawan orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Surabaya, Indonesia
Elfina Lebrine Sahetapy  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Surabaya, Indonesia
Bhanu Prakash Nunna  -  School of Liberal Arts & Sciences, RV University, India
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Indonesia’s criminal justice system recognizes closed court hearings, yet it lacks a media blackout mechanism capable of restricting the dissemination of case information beyond the courtroom. This normative gap weakens the protective purpose of closed proceedings because victims’ identities, evidentiary materials, and sensitive information may still circulate through journalistic and non-journalistic media. This article examines how a media blackout should be formulated within Indonesia’s criminal justice system. Using a doctrinal method, the study analyzes legislation, legal doctrine, human rights principles, victimology, and comparative practices from the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia. The analysis finds that a media blackout should be treated as an exceptional restriction on freedom of expression, access to information, press freedom, and the right to a fair and open trial. Its application should therefore be limited to three fundamental grounds: protection of national security and confidential state information; protection of victims, particularly children and victims of sexual violence; and protection of law-enforcement or criminal-justice interests. The blackout may take the form of temporary or permanent restrictions on publication concerning subjects or proceedings. To prevent arbitrariness, its implementation should require prior judicial authorization and provide an objection mechanism through pretrial proceedings. Courts should apply necessity and proportionality tests to determine whether no reasonable alternative can prevent serious harm and whether the protective benefits outweigh the adverse impact on individual rights, press freedom, open justice, and effective criminal adjudication.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Media Blackout; Closed Court Hearings; Open Justice; Victim Protection; Proportionality

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
REGULATIONS FOR E-COMMERCE AGREEMENT ACCORDING TO ICT ACT AND TITLE III OF INDONESIAN CIVIL CODE SHARIA GOVERNANCE ON ISLAMIC BANKING: SPIRITUAL RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE ON CONSUMER PROTECTION IN INDONESIA MANAGEMENT, DISTRIBUTION, AND REDEMPTION OF VILLAGE FUND Index JUSTICE A YEARNING IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE SOCIETY More cited articles
  1. Agarwal, Ranjan K., and Carlo Di Carlo. “The Re-Emergence of a Clash of Rights: A Critical Analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada’s Decision in R. v. S. (N.).” The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference 63, no. 1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.60082/2563-8505.1266
  2. Amnesty International. "Hong Kong: In the Name of National Security - Human Rights Violations Related to the Implementation of the Hongkong National Security Law." ASA 17/4197/2021. Report, June 2021. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa17/4197/2021/en/
  3. Ardilla, Merti, Elis Rusmiati, and Ijud Tajudin. “Peliputan Secara Langsung Persidangan Perkara Pidana Oleh Media Televisi Dihubungkan Dengan Asas Pemeriksaan Di Pengadilan Terbuka Untuk Umum Dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 50, no. 1 (2020): 35–53. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2481
  4. Blom, Robin. “Eyewitness Memory in Journalistic Context: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Study Post-Event Misinformation Effects.” Journalism Practice 17, no. 9 (2024): 1962-1979. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2034519
  5. Bosland, Jason, and Jonathan Gill. “The Principle of Open Justice and The Judicial Duty to Give Public Reasons.” Melbourne University Law Review 38, no. 2 (2014): 482–524. https://doi.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.973862058950027
  6. Budiawan, Akhmad. “Persidangan Terhadap Anak Yang Menjadi Saksi Tindak Pidana Dalam Kerangka Perlindungan Hukum Anak Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (Studi Di Pengadilan Negeri Bintuhan Dan Pengadilan Negeri Cilacap).” Jurnal Idea Hukum 2, no. 2 (2016). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jih.2016.2.2.79
  7. Choi, Hyokyung. “Are You a Victim for Sure? Media Framing on Sexual Violence and Secondary Victimization in Korea." Master's Thesis, Lund University, 2022. https://www.essays.se/essay/022066d6eb/
  8. Flynn, Asher, Jacqueline Hodgson, Jude McCulloch, and Bronwyn Naylor. “Legal Aid and Access to Legal Representation: Redefining the Right to a Fair Trial.” Melbourne University Law Review 40, no. 1 (2016): 207–239. https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/legal-aid-and-access-to-legal-representation-redefining-the-right/
  9. Gomes, Sílvia, Thais Sardá, and Rafaela Granja. “Crime, Justice and Media: Debating (Mis) Representations and Renewed Challenges.” Comunicacao e Sociedade 42 (2022): 7–24. https://doi.org/10.17231/COMSOC.42(2022).4467
  10. Gray, Anthony. “Constitutionally Protected Due Process and the Use of Criminal Intelligence Provisions.” University of New South Wales Law Journal 37, no. 1 (2014): 125–161. https://www.unsw.edu.au/content/dam/pdfs/law/unsw-law-journal/2010-2019/Vol-No-37-1-11.pdf
  11. Harahap, Yahya. (2007). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, Dan Peninjauan Kembali. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
  12. European Court of Human Rights. Case of Krone Verlag Gmbh v. Austria. Application no. 27306/07. European Court of Human Rights, September 19, 2012. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-111526
  13. Irawan, Dhani. “Pengadilan Tipikor Larang Sidang Novanto Disiarkan Live.” Detiknews. Desember 12, 2017. Accessed March 30, 2025. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3766364/pengadilan-tipikor-larang-sidang-novanto-disiarkan-live
  14. Joyce, Niamh. “An Analysis of the Extent of the Juvenile Offender’s Right to Privacy: Is the Child’s Right to Privacy Circumvented by Public Interest?” European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 19 (2011): 113–24. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181711X566335
  15. Judicial Commission of New South Wales. "Closed Court, Suppression and Non-Publication Orders." In Criminal Trials Bench Book. Last reviewed June 2024. Accessed March 30, 2025. https://www.judcom.nsw.gov.au/publications/benchbks/criminal/closed_court_and_non-publication_orders.html
  16. Khadafi, Rizal, Achmad Nurmandi, Effiati Juliana Hasibuan, et al. “Assessing the Indonesian Government’s Compliance with the Public Information Disclosure Law in the Context of COVID-19 Data Transparency.” Frontiers in Political Science 6 (May 2024): 1339506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1339506
  17. Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Rahasia Negara. Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, 2016. https://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/na_ruu_rahasia_negara.pdf
  18. Ko, Anne A. A Legal Analysis of the Access to Court Record Policies of the Provincial and Territorial Courts of the Common Law Jurisdiction of Canada and Public Accessibility. LLM Thesis, University of Toronto, 2016
  19. McGarry, John. “The Attorney General and Contempt of Court – Some Political and Constitutional Concerns.” Legal Studies 44, no. 2 (2024): 352–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2023.26
  20. Pei, Minxin. “China: Totalitarianism’s Long Shadow.” Journal of Democracy 32, no. 2 (2021): 5–21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.2021.0015
  21. Picard, Robert G., and Hannah Storm. The Kidnapping of Journalists: Reporting from High-Risk Conflict Zones. In The Kidnapping of Journalists: Reporting from High-Risk Conflict Zones. London, New York: I.B.Tauris, 2016. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/kidnapping-journalists-reporting-high-risk-conflict-zones
  22. Pidd, Helen, and Josh Halliday. “Reynhard Sinaga Jailed for Life for Raping Dozens of Men in Manchester.” In The Guardian. Manchester, January 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jan/06/reynhard-sinaga-jailed-life-drugging-raping-men-manchester
  23. Roberts, Paul, and Adrian A. S. Zuckerman. Roberts & Zuckerman’s Criminal Evidence. Third edition. Oxford University Press, 2022
  24. Schneebaum, Galia, and Shai Lavi. “The Riddle of Sub-Judice and the Modern Law of Contempt.” Critical Analysis of Law 2, no. 1 (2015): 173-198. https://doi.org/10.33137/cal.v2i1.22521
  25. Simons, Sarah. “The Media: Minimizing Re-Victimisation through Duty of Care for Victims and Responsible Journalism.” Temida 20, no. 3 (2017): 377–94. https://doi.org/10.2298/TEM1703377S
  26. Skinnider, Eileen, Ruth Montgomery, and Stephanie Garret. The Trial of Rape: Understanding the Criminal Justice System Response to Sexual Violence in Thailand and Viet Nam. The United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women), The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), June 2017. https://asiapacific.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2017/09/the-trial-of-rape
  27. Sumarwan, Untung, Arief Hidayat, and Lita Tyesta ALW. “The Future of Freedom of Press in Indonesia After the Personal Data Protection Law Era.” Indonesia Law Review 13, no. 2 (2023): 143–55. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v13n1.2
  28. Supreme Court of Canada. Dagenais v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp. 1994 SCC 39, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835. December 8, 1994. Accessed January 16, 2025. https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1204/index.do
  29. Supreme Court of Canada. R. v. Mentuck. 2001 SCC 76, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442. November 15, 2001. Accessed January 17, 2025. https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1917/index.do
  30. Supreme Court of Canada. A.B. v. Bragg Communications Inc., 2012 SCC 46, [2012] 2 SCR 567. September 27, 2012. Accessed January 17, 2025. https://canlii.ca/t/fstvq
  31. Supreme Court of Canada. Vancouver Sun (Re). 2004 SCC 43, [2004] 2 S.C.R. 332. June 23, 2004. Accessed January 16, 2025. https://canlii.ca/t/1hbl8
  32. Tandon, Neeti. Secondary Victimization of Children by the Media: An Analysis of Perceptions of Victims and Journalists. 2, no. 2 (2007): 119–135. https://www.ijcjs.com/article-detail.php?id=368
  33. The Society of Professional Journalists. Society of Professional Journalists: Code of Ethics. September 2014. https://www.spj.org/spj-code-of-ethics/
  34. Theimer, Kate, and David J. Hansen. “Child Sexual Abuse: Stigmatization of Victims and Suggestions for Clinicians.” The Behavior Therapist, 2018. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychfacpub/1003/
  35. UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), General comment no. 32, Article 14, Right to equality before courts and tribunals and to fair trial, CCPR/C/GC/32, August 23 2007, Accessed January 16, 2025, https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/hrc/2007/en/52583
  36. Wardana, Khansadhia Afifah, Rahayu Rahayu, and Sukirno Sukirno. “Redefining Indonesia’s Blasphemy Law in The Digital Age: A Human Rights Perspective.” Diponegoro Law Review 9, no. 1 (2024): 19–35. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.9.1.2024.19-35
  37. Wleizen, Christoper, and Stuart Soroka. “Media Reflect! Policy, the Public, and the News.” American Political Science Review 118, no. 3 (2024): 1563–1569. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423000874
  38. Wolhuter, Lorraine, Neil Olley, and David Denham. Victimology: Victimisation and Victims’ Rights. In Victimology: Victimisation and Victims’ Rights. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2008
  39. Wong, Lydia, and Thomas E Kellogg. Hongkong’s National Security Law: A Human Rights and Rule of Law Analysis. Research Report (Washington DC: Georgetown Center for Asian Law, 2021) https://www.law.georgetown.edu/law-asia/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2021/02/GT-HK-Report-Accessible.pdf
  40. Yanuar, Yudono. "Kronologi Razman Arif Nasution Vs Hotman Paris, Sampai Pengacara Naik Meja Di Pengadilan Jakarta Utara." Tempo. February 12, 2025. Accessed March 30, 2025. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/kronologi-razman-arif-nasution-vs-hotman-paris-sampai-pengacara-naik-meja-di-pengadilan-jakarta-utara-1206126.6

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-08-19 12:16:10

No citation recorded.