skip to main content

EMPOWERING CULTURAL COMMUNITIES IN PROTECTING TRADITIONAL EXPRESSIONS: LEGAL CHALLENGES IN THE DIGITAL AGE

*Kholis Roisah  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Rahayu Rahayu  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Moh. Asadullah Hasan Al Asy'arie  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Elena Mitskaya  -  Faculty of Law, Mukhtar Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Kazakhstan
Bryan Fayyadh Haq Wahyudi  -  Master of Notary, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Protecting Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs) is essential for safeguarding national identity and the values of communities that inherit and transmit cultural knowledge. This doctrinal study, grounded in comprehensive literature analysis, examines Indonesia’s regulatory framework and the practical challenges of TCEs protection. Research demonstrates that the limited positive influence on cultural holder communities' welfare stems from a noticeable dearth of clear technical policies outlining the institutions and systems for equitable benefit-sharing. The protection afforded to traditional cultural expressions (TCEs) is inherently twofold: it substantiates the importance of cultural diversity, spirituality, and religious practice while also functioning as an essential tool to preclude cultural plagiarism and inappropriate exploitation. The custodial  communities remain essential bearing the primary responsibility for maintaining, revitalizing, and transmitting local knowledge, artistic forms, and ritual practices. Concurrently, the digital era amplifies risks of misuse; specifically, the ease of digitization and rapid dissemination increase vulnerability to unauthorized appropriation and misrepresentation. To confront these risks, a combined approach is required, including positive and defensive measures within intellectual property regimes—such as tailored sui generis protections—alongside complementary policy instruments that emphasize community rights. Indonesia's legislative efforts, including the 2014 Copyright Law and the 2022 Government Regulation on Communal Intellectual Property (KIK), are compromised by major implementation deficits that undermine effective practical enforcement. The core argument here is for clearer, highly specific legal tools and stronger institutional arrangements that actively facilitate benefit-sharing and protect community interests. Ultimately, the study calls for a cohesive strategy that integrates protection with cultural-based economic growth and community empowerment to guarantee sustainable, intergenerational outcomes that preserve heritage while simultaneously lifting local welfare.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Traditional Cultural Expressions; Communal Intellectual Property; Cultural Law; Community Participation; Cultural-based Creative Economy

Article Metrics:

  1. Adhiyatma, Muhammad T., and Kholis Roisah. “Legal Protection for Traditional Medicine Knowledge of Paliasa Leaves in Traditional Community of South Sulawesi Through Intellectual Property Regime.” Law Reform 16, no. 2 (2020): 290–306. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v16i2.33782
  2. Al Hosni, Aida. “Cultural Heritage Preservation in the Digital Age: Balancing Tradition and Innovation in Mediterranean Smart Cities.” Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2024 1st Edition of the Mediterranean Smart Cities Conference (MSCC 2024), Martil–Tetuan. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSCC62288.2024.10697065
  3. Ariani, Nenny Dwi. “The Protection of Traditional Cultural Expression to Enhance Community Welfare in Lampung Province.” Jurnal Meta-Yuridis 8, no. 1 (March 2025): 74–80. https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v8i1.20753
  4. Astawa, I. Nyoman Temon. “The Existence of Education and Culture in the Globalization Era.” Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems 12, no. 6 (2020): 731–39. https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V12I6/S20201087
  5. Atsar, Abdul. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengetahuan Dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan Dan Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta.” Law Reform 13, no. 2 (2017): 284–99. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v13i2.16162
  6. Ayu, Miranda Risang, Rika Ratna Permata, and Laina Rafianti. “Independent Cultural Resource Protection System in Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia System.” Mimbar Hukum 29, no. 2 (2017): 205–20. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16671
  7. Bennoune, Karima. “Dignifying, Restoring, and Reimagining International Law and Justice Through Connections with Arts and Culture.” AJIL Unbound 114 (2020): 108–10. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2020.23
  8. Bhat, P. Ishwara. “Protection of Cultural Property under International Humanitarian Law: Some Emerging Trends.” ISIL Year Book of International Humanitarian and Refugee Law, 2001, 1–34
  9. Bhattacharya, Supratim. “Understanding Religious Beliefs and Practices of the Tai-Ahoms: A Study in Moranjan Gaon.” In The Routledge Handbook of Tribe and Religions in India: Contemporary Readings on Spirituality, Belief and Identity, 261–70. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003510826-23
  10. Blake, Janet. “From Traditional Culture and Folklore to Intangible Cultural Heritage: Evolution of a Treaty.” Santander Art and Culture Law Review 2, no. 3 (2017): 41–60. https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.17.017.8422
  11. Burri, Mira. “Digital Technologies and Traditional Cultural Expressions: A Positive Look at a Difficult Relationship.” International Journal of Cultural Property 17, no. 1 (2010): 33–63
  12. ———. “The Protection of Cultural Heritage by Trademark.” In Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Cultural Heritage, 56–71. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022
  13. Cocq, C. “Traditionalization for Revitalization: Tradition as a Concept and Practice in Contemporary Sámi Contexts.” Folklore (Estonia) 57 (2014): 79–100. https://doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2014.57.cocq
  14. Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 1995. https://online.zakon.kz/
  15. Dhar, Biswajit. “India’s Position in the Intergovernmental Committee for the Protection of Traditional Knowledge.” In Protecting Traditional Knowledge: The WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, 12. Routledge, 2027. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315666358
  16. Dharmawan, N. K. S. “Quo Vadis Traditional Cultural Expressions Protection: Threats from Personal Intellectual Property and Artificial Intelligence.” Law Reform 19, no. 2 (2024): 321–43. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v19i2.58639
  17. Dyrset, G., L. Margaryan, and S. Stensland. “Local Knowledge, Social Identity and Conflicts around Traditional Marine Salmon Fisheries - A Case from Mid-Norway.” Fisheries Management and Ecology 29, no. 2 (2022): 131–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12522
  18. Edward, D. Regulatory Governance: Policy Making, Legislative Drafting and Law Reform. Regulatory Governance: Policy Making, Legislative Drafting and Law Reform. 2022. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96351-4
  19. Fibiona, Indra, Andika Ariwibowo, Sumarno, Titi Mumfangati, Yustina Nurwanti, and Arief Dwinanto. “Heritage in Motion: Safeguarding the Cultural Legacy of Wayang Kulit Kedu, Indonesia.” Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 28 (June 2024): 189–208. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2024.2.06
  20. Fithriatus Shalihah and Ali Hakim. “The Obstacles of Copyright Protection against Traditional Cultural Expression in Indonesia.” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Progressive Civil Society (ICONPROCS 2019), Atlantis Press, May 2019, 113–18. https://doi.org/10.2991/iconprocs-19.2019.23
  21. Gaitenidis, N. “Indigenous Peoples, Cultural Heritage, and Traditional Knowledge: Untying the Gordian Knot of Human Rights and Intellectual Property in International Law.” International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, ahead of print, 2025. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-bja10226
  22. Gkana, A. “Peoples’ Heritage or States’ Heritage? Sovereignty in the UNESCO Mechanism for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage.” Brazilian Journal of International Law 17, no. 3 (2020): 40–59. https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v17i3.7192
  23. Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The Concept of Cultural Policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2023–2029. 2023. https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P2300000250
  24. Guèvremont, V. “La Reconnaissance Du Pilier Culturel Du Développement Durable: Vers Un Nouveau Mode de Diffusion Des Valeurs Culturelles Au Sein de l’ordre Juridique Mondial.” Canadian Yearbook of International Law, ahead of print, Cambridge University Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0069005800010833
  25. Gunkel, David. Transgression 2.0: Media, Culture, and the Politics of a Digital Age. 2011. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781628928457
  26. Hamilton, Rachel. “For Us, By Us, Protect Us: An Argument for Better Intellectual Protection of Indigenous Fashion.” Seattle Journal for Social Justice 20, no. 1 (2021): 23–56
  27. Hung, Chun-Chi. “Protection of Sacred Traditional Cultural Expressions: A Perspective from Taiwan.” Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property 14, no. 2 (2024): 208–31. https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2024.02.05
  28. Isnart, C., and A. Testa. “Reconfiguring Tradition(s) in Europe: An Introduction to the Special Issue.” Ethnologia Europaea, ahead of print, Open Library of Humanities, 2020. https://doi.org/10.16995/ee.1917
  29. Jiménez, M. J. O. “Protecting Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions through Cultural Heritage and Human Rights Norms in Colombia.” International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies 6, no. 3 (2019): 227. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijhrcs.2019.10019222
  30. Jones, P. N. “Identity through Fishing: A Preliminary Analysis of Impacts to the Nez Perce as a Result of the Damming of the Clearwater and Snake Rivers.” Cultural Dynamics, ahead of print, July 2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/0921374005058584
  31. Kaisii, Athikho. “Globalization, Hybridization and Cultural Invasion: Korean Wave in India’s North East.” Asian Communication Research 14, no. 1 (2017): 10–35. https://doi.org/10.20879/acr.2017.14.1.10
  32. Kasih, Desak Putu Dewi, Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan, Putu Aras Samsithawrati, Putri Triari Dwijayanthi, Dewa Ayu Dian Sawitri, and A.A. Istri Eka Krisna Yanti. “Policies Concerning Sacred And Open Traditional Cultural Expressions: Tourism And Creative Economy In Bali Context.” JATISWARA 38, no. 1 (2023): 14–27. https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v38i1.475
  33. Koentjaraningrat. Mentalitet and Development. 7th ed. Jakarta: PT Gramedia, 1974
  34. Kurach, Radosław. “(No) Country for Old Men? Intergenerational Welfare Distribution across Welfare State Regimes.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 43, no. 5/6 (2020). https://doi-org.proxy.undip.ac.id/10.1108/IJSSP-11-2021-0282
  35. Kusharyani, Maharsidewi, Budi Santoso, and Fifiana Wisnaeni. “Eksistensi Dan Perlindungan Wayang Orang Sriwedari Surakarta Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Hak Cipta.” Law Reform 12, no. 1 (2016): 60–72. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v12i1.15841
  36. Kusmaningtyas, R. F., A. Hidayat, G. P. Soebiakto, A. F. Permana, and I. H. Abdullah. “Traditional Cultural Expression as an Embodiment of Indigenous Communities and Regional Identity (Semarang Indonesia Case).” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 8, no. 1 (2023): 45–92. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i1.63191
  37. Kusuma, P. H., and K. Roisah. “Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions and Geographical Indications: An Intellectual Property with Communal Ownership.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Development 4, no. 1 (2022): 107–20. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i1.107-120
  38. Logan, W. “Cultural Diversity, Cultural Heritage and Human Rights: Towards Heritage Management as Human Rights-Based Cultural Practice.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 18, no. 3 (2012): 231–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.637573
  39. Mafela, Munzhedzi James. “Translating Literature: An Alternative Tool for Teaching Foreign Culture.” In Trends and Tropes: Some Aspects of African Indigenous Literatures of South Africa, 17–30. London: Routledge, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003476856-2
  40. Mitskaya, E. “Provision of the Human and Civil Rights under Integration Processes Conditions.” Eurasian Integration: Economy, Law, Politics 7 (2010): 110–15. https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_15166962_95812508.pdf
  41. Murthy, S. “The Exploited yet Legally Underappreciated Apparel Domain of Indigenous Communities: Tracing WIPO’s Efforts and Ongoing Challenges.” Journal of World Intellectual Property, July 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12266
  42. Musiza, C. “Weaving Gender in Open Collaborative Innovation, Traditional Cultural Expressions, and Intellectual Property: The Case of the Tonga Baskets of Zambia.” International Journal of Cultural Property 29, no. 1 (2022): 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739122000042
  43. Nam, Nguyen Thanh, and Nguyen Nghi Thanh. “The Role of Local Communities in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage Sites: A Case Study of Vietnam.” Journal of Asian Scientific Research 14, no. 2 (2024): 179–96. https://doi.org/10.55493/5003.V14I2.5057
  44. Njatrijani, R. “Defensive Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs) of Communities in Blora Regency.” Law, Development and Justice Review 1, no. 1 (2018): 39–68. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v1i1.3572
  45. Nwauche, Enyinna. “Traditional Cultural Expressions in Africa.” In The Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions in Africa, edited by Enyinna Nwauche, 11–51. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57231-4_2
  46. Oguamanam, Chidi. “Wandering Footloose: Traditional Knowledge and the ‘Public Domain’ Revisited.” The Journal of World Intellectual Property 21, nos. 5–6 (2018): 306–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12096
  47. Okyere, Michelle, and Janice Denoncourt. “Protecting Ghana’s Intellectual Property Rights in Kente Textiles: The Case for Geographical Indications.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 16, nos. 4–5 (2021): 415–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab010
  48. Othman, Razifah, Othman Ibrahim, Fadilah Zaini, and Siti Nuur-Ila Mat Kamal. “Aligning Cultural Heritage Preservation and Knowledge Transfer in Digital Era Between Champions and Agencies.” In Advances on Intelligent Computing and Data Science, edited by Faisal Saeed, Fathey Mohammed, Errais Mohammed, Tawfik Al-Hadhrami, and Mohammed Al-Sarem, 533–43. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023
  49. Ozer, Simon, Vladimer Lado Gamsakhurdia, and Seth J. Schwartz. “Investigating the Complexity of Cultural Identities in Globalizing Societies.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 55, no. 7 (October 2024): 723–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221241258382
  50. Palar, M. R. A., and R. Rasiah. “Universalization of Indonesian Cultural and Scientific Regulations.” African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development 11, no. 7 (2019): 873–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2019.1588510
  51. Paltrinieri, Roberta. “Cultural Welfare.” In Elgar Encyclopedia of Global Migration: New Mobilities and Artivism, 159–60. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2025. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035300389.ch44
  52. Paulino, F. F., and T. Cruz. “Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Sustainable Development: The Model of the Cultural Heritage Digital Media Lab.” In Advances in Science, Technology and Innovation, 139–49. Cham: Springer Nature, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49536-6_15
  53. Pickel-Chevalier, S., I. K. G. Bendesa, and I. N. Darma Putra. “The Integrated Tourist Villages: An Indonesian Model of Sustainable Tourism?” In Island Tourism Sustainability and Resiliency, 262–86. Abingdon: Routledge, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003280521-14
  54. Poddar, Arup Kumar. “Impact of Global Digitalization on Traditional Cultures.” International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social and Community Studies 20, no. 1 (2025): 209–32. https://doi.org/10.18848/2324-7576/CGP/v20i01/209-232
  55. Prabawa, B. A. Tegar, and N. K. Sutriyanti. “The Role of Hindu Communication on the Behavior of Youth Ajeg Bali in the Middle of the Whirlpool of Globalization.” Ganaya: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 3, no. 1 (2020): 101–11. https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v3i1.425
  56. Purba, Eva Juliana, Akbar Kurnia Putra, and Budi Ardianto. “Perlindungan Hukum Warisan Budaya Takbenda Dan Penerapannya Di Indonesia.” Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law 1, no. 1 (2022): 90–117. https://doi.org/10.22437/up.v1i1.8431
  57. Purwandoko, Prasetyo Hadi and Sulistiyono, Adi and Hawin, M. “The Implementation of the Traditional Cultural Expression (TCE) Protection in Indonesia Based on Article 38 of Law Number 28 of 2014 Regarding Copyright.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 18, no. 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol18.4.823
  58. Rastika, G. “Implementation of Legal Protection of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Against Traditional Cultural Expressions (EBT) in Review of Law Number 28 of 2014 Concerning Copyright.” Journal of Pacta Sunt Servanda 2, no. 1 (2021): 36–47. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpss.v2i1.460
  59. Rest, K. M. “The Public Policymaking Process and the Power of Participation.” In Climate Change and Public Health, 225–50. New York: Oxford University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197683293.003.0011
  60. Rodwell, D. “Inhabited Historic Cities, Urban Heritage, and Dissonances at the Heart of the World Heritage System.” European Journal of Post-Classical Archaeologies 12 (2022): 291–352
  61. Roisah, Kholis. Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions: International Law and International Law Perspectives. Semarang: Yoga Pratama Publisher, 2021
  62. Ruhulessin, Cleopatriza Thonia. “Fi Ra Wali: Revitalization of ‘Saguku Hidupku’ Folklor as Cultural Identity in the Cosmology of Sentani-Papua Community.” Journal of Philosophy 30, no. 2 (2020): 181–201. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.54207
  63. Saha Ghafur, A. Hanief. “Tourism Policy Impact on Transforming Religious Traditions of Dayak: A Case Study of the Hudoq Ceremony Tradition of the Dayak Bahau Tribe in Tourism Development, East Kalimantan, Indonesia.” Cogent Arts and Humanities 11, no. 1 (2024): 2429938. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2429938
  64. Sajeev, A., G. Panwar, P. Kavalikatta, and S. Gurpur. “Protection of Ritualistic Performances and Challenges of Copyright Law in the Digital World: A Case Study of Theyyam.” 2523 (2023). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0123590
  65. Sajeev, Aparna, Garima Panwar, G. Panwar, Preethi Kavalikatta, and Shashikala Gurpur. “Protection of Ritualistic Performances and Challenges of Copyright Law in the Digital World: A Case Study of Theyyam.” 2523 (2021): 030008. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.012359
  66. Sardjono, Agus. “IPR and the Cultural Promotion Law.” JIPRO-Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 2, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.20885/jipro.vol2.iss2.art5
  67. Shetty, P., and R. Samant. “From ‘Vulgar’ to ‘Progressive’: The Curious Case of Shorts as an Outfit among Young Indian Girls.” International Journal of Critical Cultural Studies 18, no. 2 (2020): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0055/CGP/V18I02/1-10
  68. Sreenath, K. P., and C. J. Anson. “Geographical Indications and Traditional Cultural Expressions: A Comparative Legal Analysis of the GI Laws of Indonesia and India and a Case Study Analysis.” The Journal of World Intellectual Property, ahead of print, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12274
  69. Storey, M. “The Right to Enjoy Cultural Heritage and Australian Indigenous Cultural Heritage Legislation.” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 41, no. 1 (2023): 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2022.2150410
  70. Sukihana, Ida Ayu, and I Gede Agus Kurniawan. “Karya Cipta Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional: Studi Empiris Perlindungan Tari Tradisional Bali Di Kabupaten Bangli.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal); Vol 7 No 1 (2018), ahead of print, 2018. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2018.v07.i01.p05
  71. Taubman, Antony and Leistner, Matthias. “Analysis of Different Areas of Indigenous Resources, Section 1 Traditional Knowledge.” In Indigenous Heritage and Intellectual Property, edited by Silke von Lewinski, 83. Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer, Law and Business, 2007
  72. Tauschek, M. “Cultural Property as Strategy: The Carnival of Binche, the Creation of Cultural Heritage and Cultural Property.” Ethnologia Europaea, ahead of print, 2009. https://doi.org/10.16995/ee.1056
  73. Testa, Alessandro, and Cyril Isnart. “Reconfiguring Tradition(s) in Europe: An Introduction to the Special Issue.” Ethnologia Europaea 50, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.16995/ee.1917
  74. Tuncer, F. F. “Discussing Globalization and Cultural Hybridization.” Universal Journal of History and Culture 5, no. 2 (2023): 85–103. https://doi.org/10.52613/ujhc.1279438
  75. Ubertazzi, Benedetta. “Intellectual Property Rights and Intangible Cultural Heritage.” In Intangible Cultural Heritage, Sustainable Development and Intellectual Property: International and European Perspectives, edited by Benedetta Ubertazzi, 119–85. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08104-0_4
  76. UNESCO. Basic Texts: Of the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO, 2020
  77. United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). General Comment No. 17: The Right of Everyone to Benefit from the Protection of the Moral and Material Interests Resulting from Any Scientific, Literary or Artistic Production of Which He or She Is the Author (Art. 15, Para. 1(c) of the Covenant). UN Doc. E/C.12/GC/17. 2006. https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/cescr/2006/en/39826
  78. Vargas, Alberto. “WIPO’s Proposed Treatment of Sacred Traditional Cultural Expressions as a Distinct Form of Intellectual Property.” Chicago Journal of International Law 23, no. 1 (2022). https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cjil/vol23/iss1/14
  79. Widyanti, Y. E. “Protection of Indonesian Traditional Cultural Expressions in a Sui Generis System.” Arena Hukum 13, no. 3 (2020): 388–415. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2020.01303.1
  80. Widyanti, Yenny Eta. “Human Rights and Indonesian Legal Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions: A Comparative Study in Kenya and South Africa.” Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syariah; Vol 14, No 2 (2023): JurisdictieDO - 10.18860/j.V14i2.24318, January 10, 2024. https://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/jurisdictie/article/view/24318
  81. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Comparative Study on the Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions: The Oma Case Study in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), 2021
  82. ———. The Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions: Draft Articles. WIPO/GRTKF/IC/19/4. Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, Nineteenth Session. Geneva, 2011. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_grtkf_ic_19/wipo_grtkf_ic_19_4.pdf
  83. Xue, Guanlan, Jinglian Chen, and Zhuozhuang Lin. “Cultural Sustainable Development Strategies of Chinese Traditional Furniture: Taking Ming-Style Furniture for Example.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 16, no. 17 (2024): 744
  84. Yang, Chih-Chieh. “Is the Registration System a Prerequisite for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions.” Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 2022, 350–75. https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2022.03.03
  85. Yi, Wang. “Philosophical Perspectives on Cultural Hybridity: The Dynamics of Identity and Alterity.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 15, no. 4 (2023): 403–18. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2023.4325
  86. Zhao, Linyi, Daojian Yang, Suxia Liu, and Edmund Nana Kwame Nkrumah. “The Effect of Safety Leadership on Safety Participation of Employee: A Meta-Analysis.” Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827694

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-10-31 15:15:48

No citation recorded.