BibTex Citation Data :
@article{Dilrev75783, author = {I Gede Agus Kurniawan and Ni Made Dyah Sukasmini Merthada and I Made Wirya Darma and Ni Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Tri Wulandari and Souad Ahmed Ezzerouali and Princess Alyssa Tee-anastacio}, title = {DECONSTRUCTING TRADEMARK AUTHENTICITY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LEGAL INTERPRETATIONS IN INDONESIA, OMAN, AND THE PHILIPPINES}, journal = {Diponegoro Law Review}, volume = {10}, number = {2}, year = {2025}, keywords = {Deconstruction; Derrida; Trademark Law; Authenticity; Intellectual Property}, abstract = { This study examines the concept of trademark authenticity in Indonesia, Oman, and the Philippines through Jacques Derrida’s deconstruction theory. In trademark law, authenticity is commonly perceived as a stable attribute of a product and its origin. However, this notion is contested by the varying ways national legal systems apply trademark law. In this pluralistic context, authenticity is not a fixed legal fact but a matter of interpretation. By employing Derrida's theory, this research investigates how the meaning of authenticity is constructed, destabilized, and reconstructed across different intellectual property frameworks. It also explores how each country's legal system addresses or resists the inherent instability of trademark meanings. Using a comparative legal analysis, doctrinal research, and a post-structuralist interpretive approach, the study finds that in Indonesia, authenticity is closely tied to consumer perception; in Oman, it is linked to origin and moral identity; and in the Philippines, fairness and commercial honesty play a significant role. The novelty of this research lies in its assertion that brand authenticity is a legal construct subject to reinterpretation, challenging the notion of fixed legal definitions. The findings urge a reconsideration of national intellectual property systems, advocating for a more flexible, culturally situated view of brands that accommodates the evolving global context. This study also reveals that the legal understanding of trademark authenticity in these jurisdictions is shaped by a logocentric and hierarchical legal structure, opening space for critique of the dominance of a single legal narrative over diverse social realities. A limitation of this study is its reliance on conceptual analysis without empirical data, suggesting the need for further research through case studies to strengthen the findings. }, issn = {2527-4031}, pages = {310--322} doi = {10.14710/dilrev.10.2.2025.310-322}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/75783} }
Refworks Citation Data :
This study examines the concept of trademark authenticity in Indonesia, Oman, and the Philippines through Jacques Derrida’s deconstruction theory. In trademark law, authenticity is commonly perceived as a stable attribute of a product and its origin. However, this notion is contested by the varying ways national legal systems apply trademark law. In this pluralistic context, authenticity is not a fixed legal fact but a matter of interpretation. By employing Derrida's theory, this research investigates how the meaning of authenticity is constructed, destabilized, and reconstructed across different intellectual property frameworks. It also explores how each country's legal system addresses or resists the inherent instability of trademark meanings. Using a comparative legal analysis, doctrinal research, and a post-structuralist interpretive approach, the study finds that in Indonesia, authenticity is closely tied to consumer perception; in Oman, it is linked to origin and moral identity; and in the Philippines, fairness and commercial honesty play a significant role. The novelty of this research lies in its assertion that brand authenticity is a legal construct subject to reinterpretation, challenging the notion of fixed legal definitions. The findings urge a reconsideration of national intellectual property systems, advocating for a more flexible, culturally situated view of brands that accommodates the evolving global context. This study also reveals that the legal understanding of trademark authenticity in these jurisdictions is shaped by a logocentric and hierarchical legal structure, opening space for critique of the dominance of a single legal narrative over diverse social realities. A limitation of this study is its reliance on conceptual analysis without empirical data, suggesting the need for further research through case studies to strengthen the findings.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2026-04-09 17:09:31
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Diponegoro Law Review journal (Dilrev) and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Diponegoro Law Review journal and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Dilrev journal are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro
Gedung Satjipto Rahardjo - Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH. Tembalang-Semarang
dilrev@live.undip.ac.id
http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr
024 - 76918201 / 024 - 76918206 (fax)
Diponegoro Law Review (DILREV, e-ISSN : 2527-4031) published by Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro - in collaboration with Asosiasi Pengajar dan Peneliti Hukum Ekonomi Islam Indonesia (APPHEISI) and Asosiasi Sosiologi Hukum Indonesia (ASHI) - under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
e-ISSN : 2527-4031