DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.11.1.2026.24-37

DECENTRALIZATION AND LEGAL FRAGMENTATION: GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES IN THE POST-REFORM ERA

*Yusdiyanto Yusdiyanto  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
Tatiana Epifanova  -  Department of Civil Law, Rostov State University of Economics, Russian Federation
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Post-reform decentralization in Indonesia has become pivotal for reinforcing democracy and improving governance. Implementation over two decades has led to serious problems, particularly legal fragmentation and regional governance disparities. In this article, we aim to explore the relationship between decentralization and legal fragmentation, and its implications for governance in the post-reform era. To this end, we use a combination of doctrinal and non-doctrinal approaches, with the primary emphasis remaining on the doctrinal method. Analysis, including national regulations, court decisions, government reports, and national and international academic research. The results highlight three main findings. First, decentralization has successfully nurtured local democratization through direct regional head elections and increased public participation, even though the practice of money politics and the dominance of local elites continue to pose challenges. Second, regional autonomy has resulted in legal fragmentation, marked by thousands of problematic regional regulations, either revoked for conflicting with higher-level regulations or for being discriminatory and impeding investment. Third, governance faces multidimensional challenges, including weak institutional capacity, a tug-of-war over central and regional authority, and corruption in several regions. This research provides a critical analysis of the dynamics of decentralization in Indonesia, underscoring the urgency of legal harmonization, institutional design, and regional government capacity. Accordingly, decentralization does not only symbolize democratization but can also be instrumental for strengthening legal certainty and governance.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Decentralization; Legal Fragmentation; Governance; Post-Reformation

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
REGULATIONS FOR E-COMMERCE AGREEMENT ACCORDING TO ICT ACT AND TITLE III OF INDONESIAN CIVIL CODE THE FUNCTION OF IDEAL LAW IN PREPARATION REGULATION LEGISLATION IN ORDER TO CREATING EQUITABLE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Index MANAGEMENT, DISTRIBUTION, AND REDEMPTION OF VILLAGE FUND Index More cited articles
  1. Abidin, Abidin, Tulus Suryanto, and Mohd Mizan Aslam. “Ijya’ Al Mawat’s Resistance to Land Legal Policy in Indonesia.” Diponegoro Law Review 09, no. 2 (2024): 297–314. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.9.2.2024.297-314
  2. Altamimi, Hala, Qiaozhen Liu, and Benedict Jimenez. “Not Too Much, Not Too Little: Centralization, Decentralization, and Organizational Change.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 33, no. 1 (2023): 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac016
  3. Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015
  4. Belof, Magdalena, and Piotr Kryczka. “Challenges in Outsourcing Local Spatial Planning in Poland : Is Legal Procedure the Last Remaining Safeguard in the Democratic Decision-Making Process ?” Planning Practice & Research, no. July (2025): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2025.2528252
  5. Butt, Simon. Corruption and Law in Indonesia. London: Routdledge, 2011
  6. Chapra, Umer. Islam Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 2000
  7. Faguet, Jean-paul. “Decentralization and Governance.” World Development 53 (2014): 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002
  8. Faguet, Jean-Paul. Decentralization and Popular Democracy: Governance from Below in Bolivia. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.175269
  9. Giulio, Marco Di, and Giancarlo Vecchi. “Implementing Digitalization in the Public Sector: Technologies, Agency, and Governance.” Public Policy and Administration 38, no. 2 (2021): 133–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767211023283
  10. Hamidi, Abdul Basir. “The Paradox of Decentralization : Examining Corruption in Indonesia’s Decentralized Framework.” Journal of Governance 9, no. 3 (2024): 512–29. https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v9i3.22574
  11. Harsono, Andreas. “Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Mendukung Peraturan Wajib Jilbab Pemerintah Seyogianya Menegakkan Hak Anak Perempuan Dan Perempuan Muslim Untuk Memilih.” Human Right Watch, July 1, 2021. https://www.hrw.org/id/news/2021/07/01/379120
  12. Karray, Bassem. “No Roadmap, No Global Vision: Shortcomings and Pitfalls of the First Stage of Decentralization Reforms in Tunisia.” Mediterranean Politics 30, no. 25 (2023): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2023.2207431
  13. Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1949
  14. Lindvall, Daniel, and M. Karlsson. “Exploring the Democracy-Climate Nexus: A Review of Correlations between Democracy and Climate Policy Performance.” Climate Policy 24, no. 1 (2024): 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2256697
  15. Litvark, Jennie, Junaid Ahmad, and Richard Bird. Decentralization in Developing Countries. Washington DC: The World Bank, 1998
  16. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016
  17. Otia, Javis Ebua, and Enrico Bracci. “Digital Transformation and the Public Sector Auditing : The SAI ’ s Perspective.” Financial Acc & Man January (2022): 252–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12317
  18. Panagariya, Arvind. India: The Emerging Giant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008
  19. Pardede, Marulak. “Legitimasi Pemilihan Kepala/Wakil Kepala Daerah Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Otonomi Daerah.” Jurnal Penelitian De Jure 18, no. 2 (2018): 127–48. https://lawpolicyjournal.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/431
  20. Razmjoo, Armin, Poul Alberg Alberg, Mouloud Denaï, Meysam Majidi Majidi, and Seyedali Mirjalili. “Effective Policies to Overcome Barriers in the Development of Smart Cities.” Energy Research & Social Science 79, no. July (2021): 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102175
  21. Rees, Christopher J., and Farhad Hossain. “Perspectives on Decentralization and Local Governance in Developing and Transitional Countries.” International Journal of Public Administration, 33, no. 12–13 (2010): 581–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2010.514459
  22. Rodden, Jonathan A. Hamilton’s Paradox : The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006
  23. Ryter, Loren. “Vedi Ranandi Hadiz, Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 55, no. 2 (2013): 515–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417513000170
  24. Sabara, Abdul Rahman. “Regional Autonomy in the Political System and Authory in Indonesia.” Diponegoro Law Review 07, no. 2 (2022): 296–311. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.7.2.2022.296-311
  25. Sakdiyah, Halimatus. “Efektivitas Otonomi Daerah Dalam Mewujudkan Tujuan Negara : Tinjauan Kritis Desentralisasi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Indonesia 3, no. 1 (2025): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.62238/jupsi.v3i1.191
  26. Satya, Venti Eka, and Monika Suhayati. “Analisis Efektivitas Undang-Undang Tentang Hubungan Keuangan Pusat Daerah Terhadap Kemandirian Fiskal Daerah.” Parliamentary Review 6, no. 1 (2024): 21–29. https://berkas.dpr.go.id/pusaka/files/parliamentary_review/Parliamentary%20Review-VI-1-M-2024.pdf
  27. Sekretaris Kabinet Republik Indonesia. “Kemendagri Resmi Umumkan 3.143 Perda Yang Dibatalkan.” Sekretaris Kabinet Republik Indonesia, 2016. https://setkab.go.id/kemendagri-resmi-umumkan-3-143-perda-yang-dibatalkan/
  28. Setyawan, Yhannu, Anna Erliyana, Edmon Makarim, Fitriani Ahlan Sjarif, Lia Riesta Dewi, and Ahmad Novindri Aji Sukma. “Digital Government Post-Reform in Indonesia : Normative Developments and Implementation by State Organizing Institutions.” Law Reform 21, no. 1 (2025): 155–79. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v21i1.68556
  29. Shandy, Nabila Alif Radika, and Allan Fatchan Gani Wardhana. “Bagaimana Hubungan Pusat Dan Daerah Pasca Penetapan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja ? Kasus Penetapan Pajak Daerah.” AS-SIYASI: Journal of Constitutional Law 2, no. 1 (2022): 93–114. https://doi.org/10.24042/as-siyasi.v2i1.12934
  30. Siswidiyanto, and Rindi Ardika Melsalasa Sahputri. “Decentralisation and Human Development in Indonesia: The Importance of Local Government Capacity in Delivering Development Outputs and Outcomes.” Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government 21, no. 2 (2023): 393–419. https://doi.org/10.4335/21.2.393-419(2023)
  31. Smoke, P. “Managing Public Sector Decentralization in Developing Countries: Moving Beyond Conventional Recipes.” Public Administration and Development 35 (2015): 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1736
  32. Sousa, Luis de, Nuno F. da Cruz, and Daniel Fernandes. “The Quality of Local Democracy: An Institutional Analysis.” Local Government Studies 49, no. 1 (2023): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.1882428
  33. Suberu, Rotimi. “Federalism in Africa: The Nigerian Experience in Comparative Perspective.” Ethnopolitics 8, no. 1 (2009): 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449050902738846
  34. Treisman, Daniel. The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007
  35. Tsala, Charly Ondobo, Raymond Ekodo, and Henri Tabi Ngoa. “Does Decentralization Decrease State Fragility? Evidence from Developing Countries.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 16 (2025): 15228–15259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02400-2
  36. Uzougbo, Ngozi Samuel, Chinonso Gladys Ikegwu, and Adefolake Olachi Adewusi. “Regulatory Frameworks for Decentralized Finance ( DeFi ): Challenges and Opportunities.” GSC Advanced Research and Reviews 19, no. 2 (2024): 116–129. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.19.2.0170
  37. Yigitcanlar, Tan, Duzgun Agdas, and Kenan Degirmenci. “Artificial Intelligence in Local Governments : Perceptions of City Managers on Prospects , Constraints and Choices.” AI & SOCIETY 38 (2023): 1135–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01450-x

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-06-23 22:49:29

No citation recorded.