skip to main content

Tuturan Ketaksaan sebagai Bentuk Variasi Bahasa Gen Z di TikTok: Kajian Sosiolinguistik

Jurusan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Raya Bandung Sumedang KM.21, Hegarmanah, Kec. Jatinangor, Kabupaten Sumedang, Jawa Barat 45363, Indonesia

Received: 3 Aug 2026; Published: 25 Oct 2026.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 Regina Alya under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Indeterminate utterances are those that do not explicitly state a referent or meaning, so their interpretation depends on the context of the interaction. This phenomenon is prevalent in Gen Z’s digital communication on TikTok, as seen in expressions such as “adalah pokoknya” and “jangan terlalu diini-iniin, apa sih namanya”, which demonstrate that the meaning of language in the digital sphere does not always depend on complete grammatical structures, but is also shaped by the social and cultural context of communication on social media. This study aims to describe a model of ambiguous utterances as a linguistic variation in Gen Z’s digital communication, explain their linguistic forms, and analyse their social functions and the relationship between social context and their meaning. The study employs a qualitative descriptive approach with a sociolinguistic analysis. The data consisted of 12 instances of indefinite discourse collected from TikTok content using the ‘listen and note’ technique, which were subsequently analysed using contextual analysis. The research findings indicate that indefinite discourse takes the form of placeholder expressions that are non-referential and contextual in nature. These expressions function as mitigation strategies, indirect expressions of emotion, digital humour, markers of a pause for thought, and builders of social solidarity amongst social media users. These findings suggest that social context, shared knowledge and digital communication conventions play a role in helping users understand expressions whose referents are not explicitly stated.
Fulltext Email colleagues
Keywords: tuturan ketaksaan; komunikasi digital; Generasi Zilenial (Gen Z); TikTok; sosiolinguistik

Article Metrics:

  1. Azwardi. (2018). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. Banda Aceh: Syiah Kuala University Press
  2. Chaer, A., & Agustina, L. (2010). Sosiolinguistik: Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
  3. Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  4. Nurhayati, I. K., & Putri, A. R. (2024). Exploring cyberculture: A virtual ethnographic perspective on generation Z slang on TikTok. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 23(3), 400-415. https://doi.org/10.5614/sostek.itbj.2024.23.3.8
  5. Putri, D. A., & Nur Sabrina, A. H. (2024). Ambiguitas Berbahasa pada Sosial Media dan Percakapan Sehari-Hari Generasi Z. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(3), 45962–45970. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/22677
  6. Saleh, Sirajuddin. (2017). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Bandung: Pustaka Ramadhan
  7. Situmorang, S. (2025). Transformasi bahasa dan konteks sosial dalam praktik komunikasi digital Gen-Z di TikTok: Suatu kajian pragmatik. DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 5(4), 5439–5445. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/398451438_Transformasi_Bahasa_dan_Konteks_Sosial_dalam_Praktik_Komunikasi_Digital_Gen-Z_di_TikTok_Suatu_Kajian_Pragmatik
  8. Sean. (2024, Desember 24). Analisis Konten. FanRuan Indonesia. https://www.fanruan.com/id/glossary/analisis-data/analisis-konten
  9. Ningsih, D., Zefanya, E. G., Rahmah, P. A., Ramadhani, R. A., & Anhar. (2025). Strategi Komunikasi Digital Generasi Z: Analisis Pragmatik Kreativitas Bahasa dalam Komentar Tiktok. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 6(6), 9942-9949. http://doi.org/10.54373/imeij.v6i6.4331
  10. Wardhaugh, Ronald. (1995). Sosiolinguistik. Diterjemahkan oleh Rochayah dan Misbach Djamil. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  11. Febrianti, A., Pascha F, D. P., Agustin, Y. R., Rusdianti, A., & Sholihatin, E. (2023). Analisis semantik ragam bahasa gaul oleh Gen Z di aplikasi TikTok. Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 1(3), 1257–1265. https://humasjournal.my.id/index.php/HJ/index
  12. Mailani, O., Nuraeni, I., Syakila, S. A., & Lazuardi, J. (2022). Bahasa sebagai alat komunikasi dalam kehidupan manusia. KAMPRET Journal, 1(2), 1–10. www.plus62.isha.or.id/index.php/kampret
  13. Nisa, N. C., & Rizal, G. A. (2025). Analisis ambiguitas dan interpretasi ganda dalam bahasa di media sosial: Kajian semantik. Dialektika. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 5(1), 19–29. https://journal.peradaban.ac.id/index.php/jdpbsi
  14. Ratnasari, M., & Yuanita, A. (2025). PERUBAHAN MAKNA PADA KOSAKATA BAHASA GAUL GENERASI Z DAN ALPHA : STUDI KASUS PENGGUNAAN MEDIA SOSIAL. Jurnal Sapala, 12(02), 46–56. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-sapala/article/view/72121
  15. Stefani, A. P., & Aprilya, V. (2026). Fenomena bahasa gaul generasi Z dalam komunikasi media sosial TikTok. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Terpadu, 10(4). https://sejurnal.com/pub/index.php/jpmt/article/view/310

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-10-27 21:10:35

No citation recorded.