BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JITAA66260, author = {D. A. Abidinsyah and I. B. Suyub and S. Jusoh and H. Yaakub}, title = {The digestibility, ruminal fermentation and methane product of Cajanus cajan forage as a concentrate substitute in goats}, journal = {Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture}, volume = {49}, number = {4}, year = {2024}, keywords = {Cajanus cajan; Digestibility; Goats; Methane production}, abstract = { Sixteen local goats (9.3 kg bodyweight) were assigned to different groups based on a 21-day com-pletely randomized design and fed with Cajanus cajan forage. The objectives of the study were to eval-uate digestibility, ruminal fermentation and estimation of methane production of C. cajan forage as a concentrate substitute in goats. Four treatments were used in the feeding trial: T0CC = 100% concen-trate; T25CC = 75% concentrate + 25% C. cajan forage; T75CC = 25% concentrate + 75% C. cajan forage; and T100CC = 100% C. cajan forage. Ruminal fluid was collected during the last week of the experiment after feeding and used to determine pH, ammonia, partial VFA, and methane gas produc-tion. Dry matter intake, nutrient digestibility, and total body weight gain were not significantly differ-ent (P>0.05) between goats fed with T0CC and T25CC. The addition of C. cajan forage to the diet did not significantly (P>0.05) affect pH, ammonia content, and total VFA but influenced acetate, propio-nate, butyrate, AP, and estimated CH4 produced. Hence, C. cajan forage may replace 25% of concen-trates in a rice straw-based diet for goats. }, issn = {2460-6278}, pages = {307--315} doi = {10.14710/jitaa.49.4.307-315}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/jitaa/article/view/66260} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Sixteen local goats (9.3 kg bodyweight) were assigned to different groups based on a 21-day com-pletely randomized design and fed with Cajanus cajan forage. The objectives of the study were to eval-uate digestibility, ruminal fermentation and estimation of methane production of C. cajan forage as a concentrate substitute in goats. Four treatments were used in the feeding trial: T0CC = 100% concen-trate; T25CC = 75% concentrate + 25% C. cajan forage; T75CC = 25% concentrate + 75% C. cajan forage; and T100CC = 100% C. cajan forage. Ruminal fluid was collected during the last week of the experiment after feeding and used to determine pH, ammonia, partial VFA, and methane gas produc-tion. Dry matter intake, nutrient digestibility, and total body weight gain were not significantly differ-ent (P>0.05) between goats fed with T0CC and T25CC. The addition of C. cajan forage to the diet did not significantly (P>0.05) affect pH, ammonia content, and total VFA but influenced acetate, propio-nate, butyrate, AP, and estimated CH4 produced. Hence, C. cajan forage may replace 25% of concen-trates in a rice straw-based diet for goats.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2025-01-05 05:33:19
Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Diponegoro University
Campus Drh. Soejono Koesoemowardojo,Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH., Tembalang, SemarangIndonesia 50275
jitaa.undip@gmail.com
http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/jitaa
Phone/Fax: +62247474750