skip to main content

Evaluasi Kebergunaan (Usability) dan Rekomendasi Penggunaan Google Classroom untuk Blended Learning di Perguruan Tinggi

Agus Priyadi  -  Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Indonesia
*Eko Sediyono  -  Fakultas Teknologi Informasi, Indonesia
Hindriyanto Dwi Purnomo  -  Fakultas Teknologi Informasi, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 JSINBIS (Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis)

Citation Format:

The google classroom application is a virtual classroom mixed with real classes in education where the distribution of material and lecture assignments can be done by teachers and students without using paper or paperless. Interaction between teachers and students is done interactively online. The use of the google classroom application as a teaching tool has only been implemented at XYZ college, so usability testing is needed in the use of google classroom. Testing the usability level of Google Classroom is really needed to evaluate and get recommendations about using the Google Classroom application. The method used in this study is the USE (Usefullness, Satisfaction and Ease of Use) Questionnaire and Cognitive Walkthrough (CW) used in the google classroom usability test. USE stands for Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use. Ease of use factors can be divided into two, namely Ease of Learning and Ease of Use. The USE test involved all XYZ college students, totaling 213 respondents. Ten respondents within certain criteria were selected by purposive sampling technique to test the usefulness of using the cognitive walkthrough (CW) method. The overall assessment of the usefulness factor with a mean value of 3.95 is included in the "Good" rating range. Overall, the satisfaction factor value of 4.01 is included in the "Good" rating range. Overall, the assessment of the Ease of use indicator with a mean of 4.22 is included in the "Good" rating range. The cognitive walkthrough (CW) method produces several recommendations that can be utilized by XYZ universities in implementing blended learning using google classroom. The usability factor with various features offered by Google Classroom is quite high because it can provide convenience in its use to support lecture activities at XYZ College

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
Copyright Transfer Agreement
Type Other
  Download (967KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Usability; USE Quesitonner; Cognitive Walktrough; Google Classroom; Blended Learning

Article Metrics:

  1. Aelani, K. and Falahah, 2012. Pengukuran usability sistem menggunakan use questionnaire. Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi, 15–16
  2. Alshehri, F and Freeman, M., 2012. Methods of usability evaluations of mobile devices. ACIS 2012 : Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems
  3. Bligård, L.O. and Osvalder, A.L., 2013. Enhanced cognitive walkthrough: Development of the cognitive walkthrough method to better predict, identify, and present usability problems. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2013.
  4. Bondarenko, O.V., Mantulenko, S.V and Pikilnyak, A.V., 2019. Google classroom as a tool of support of blended learning for geography students. arXiv
  5. Defriani, M., Resmi, M.G., Jaelani, I., 2021. Uji Usability dengan metode Cognitive Walkthrough dan System Usability Scale (SUS) pada situs web STT Wastukancana. Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science (INTECOMS), 4(1): 30–39
  6. Filippova, T., 2015. Priority fields of e-learning development in Russia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206: 348–353.
  7. Habibi, S., Akbari, L.S., Miandoab, A.T., and Soltani, T.S., 2019. Usability of central library websites of Iranian Universities of Medical Sciences: An Evaluation. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 39(4): 162–168.
  8. Hockly, N., 2018. Application of the Blended Learning Model During the Teaching of the “Foreign Language for Professional Use” Course. ELT, 72(1):97–101
  9. Kurnia, R.S., Utami, E., Fatta, H., Al Road, J.R and Catur, C., 2017. Pengujian Usability Antarmuka Aplikasi Braille Smart. 2(1), 21–28
  10. Lund, A.M., 2001. Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface, 8(2):3–6
  11. Maryati, I., Ardiansyah, F. and Kusuma, W., 2014. Pengujian Cognitive Walkthrough Antarmuka Perpustakaan Digital (E-Library) Pusat Dokumentasi dan Informasi Ilmiah – LIPI (PDII-LIPI). Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi, 35(1):25–40
  12. Nurhadryani, Y., Sianturi, S.K., Hermadi, I. dan Khotimah, H., 2013. Pengujian usability untuk meningkatkan antarmuka aplikasi mobile. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Agri-Informatika, 2(2):83-93. .8
  13. Pratama, A.V., Qomariah, T.J., Mahaerani, H., Setiadi, F and Zultari, M.D., 2018. Uji usability situs web academic information system (AIS) Uin Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta dengan metode Cognitive Walkthrough. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 0–6
  14. Pratama, F.A., Sediyono, E., 2016. Analisis Perbandingan sistem informasi perjalanan dinas berdasarkan elements Human Computer Interaction (HCI) (Studi Kasus : Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Kalimantan Barat). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 3(2): 110.
  15. Purhita, E. J., 2019. Affordance dalam desain Intuitif dan Human Computer Interaction (HCI). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, 10(1): 7–14
  16. Raharjo, P., Kusuma, W.A., & Sukoco, H., 2016. Uji usability dengan metode Cognitive Walkthrough pada situs web perpustakaan Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta. Jurnal Pustakawan Indonesia, 15(1–2)
  17. Setiawan, D dan Rafianto, N., 2020. Pengukuran usability pada learning management system perguruan tinggi menggunakan pedoman system usability scale. Teknologi: Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi, 10(1), 23–31.
  18. Shekhar, A. and Marsden, N., 2018. Cognitive walkthrough of a learning management system with gendered personas. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 191–198.
  19. Smith, A., Ben, Bamgboje, A., Butow, P., Klein, B., Turner, J., Sharpe, L., Girgis, A., 2020. Development and usability evaluation of an online self-management intervention for fear of cancer recurrence (iConquerFear). Psycho-Oncology, 29(1), 98–106.
  20. Subana dan Sudrajat, 2011. Dasar-dasar Penelitian Ilmiah. Surakarta. Pustaka Setia
  21. Sugiyono, 2018. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif,Kualitatif dan R&D. In ke-26 (p. 334). Retrieved from
  22. Ventayen, R.J.M., Estira, K.L.A., Guzman, M.J.De., Cabaluna, C.M. and Espinosa, N.N., 2018. Usability evaluation of google classroom: basis for the adaptation of gsuite e-learning platform software management view project data analysis view project. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 5(1), 47–51
  23. Wilson, C., 2013. User Interface Inspection Methods: A User-Centered Design Method. In User Interface Inspection Methods: A User-Centered Design Method.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-02-23 08:14:42

No citation recorded.