BibTex Citation Data :
@article{MMH5833, author = {So Kim}, title = {PENDEKATAN KEADILAN MELALUI SILAISME DAN STANDARISASI PIDANA (PENYUSUNAN POLA PIDANA)}, journal = {Masalah-Masalah Hukum}, volume = {42}, number = {3}, year = {2013}, keywords = {Keadilan, Silaisme, Standarisasi Pidana (Penyusunan Pola Pidana)}, abstract = { Abstract “Sila” itself in Pancasila is misinterpreted, making it difficult to be actualized. Sila, properly interpreted as a doctrine/precept supported by freedom is referred as “Silaism”. Silaism needs to be supported by the standardization of sanction, considering within the practice of the criminal law system, sanction occupies a central position. Both the KUHP (Criminal Code) and the laws outside of KUHP regulates delict and sanction as one and both act more individually, where each delict has its own sanction. Sanctions may differ between the KUHP and laws outside of KUHP, thus bringing conflict between norms and disparities. Therefore, a new sanction standardization is needed. To achieve “Justice”, both Silaism and sanction standardization are vital. Keywords: Justice, Silaisme, Criminal Standards (Compilation Criminal Pattern) Abstrak Kesalahan pemaknaan sila pada Pancasila membuat Pancasila sulit diaktualisasikan. Pandangan mengenai pemaknaan yang tepat yaitu Sila sebagai ajaran / precept dan didukung adanya kebebasan disebut sebagai “Silaisme”. Silaisme perlu didukung dengan adanya standarisasi pidana. M engingat pentingnya pidana dalam sistem penyelenggaraan hukum pidana. Baik KUHP maupun UU di luar KUHP pengaturan delik dan pidana menjadi satu, dan lebih bersifat individual, dimana masing-masing delik terdapat pidananya. Antara KUHP dan UU di luar KUHP bisa berbeda mengenai pidananya. Hal tersebut akan membawa dampak adanya konflik norma dan disparitas. Untuk itu perlu adanya standar pidana yaitu d engan penyusunan pola pidana baru . Silaisme dan standarisasi pidana merupakan upaya pendekatan terhadap keadilan. Kata Kunci : Keadilan, Silaisme, Standarisasi Pidana (Penyusunan Pola Pidana) }, issn = {2527-4716}, pages = {397--404} doi = {10.14710/mmh.42.3.2013.397-404}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/5833} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Abstract
“Sila” itself in Pancasila is misinterpreted, making it difficult to be actualized. Sila, properly interpreted as a doctrine/precept supported by freedom is referred as “Silaism”. Silaism needs to be supported by the standardization of sanction, considering within the practice of the criminal law system, sanction occupies a central position. Both the KUHP (Criminal Code) and the laws outside of KUHP regulates delict and sanction as one and both act more individually, where each delict has its own sanction. Sanctions may differ between the KUHP and laws outside of KUHP, thus bringing conflict between norms and disparities. Therefore, a new sanction standardization is needed. To achieve “Justice”, both Silaism and sanction standardization are vital.
Keywords: Justice, Silaisme, Criminal Standards (Compilation Criminal Pattern)
Abstrak
Kesalahan pemaknaan sila pada Pancasila membuat Pancasila sulit diaktualisasikan. Pandangan mengenai pemaknaan yang tepat yaitu Sila sebagai ajaran / precept dan didukung adanya kebebasan disebut sebagai “Silaisme”. Silaisme perlu didukung dengan adanya standarisasi pidana. Mengingat pentingnya pidana dalam sistem penyelenggaraan hukum pidana. Baik KUHP maupun UU di luar KUHP pengaturan delik dan pidana menjadi satu, dan lebih bersifat individual, dimana masing-masing delik terdapat pidananya. Antara KUHP dan UU di luar KUHP bisa berbeda mengenai pidananya. Hal tersebut akan membawa dampak adanya konflik norma dan disparitas. Untuk itu perlu adanya standar pidana yaitu dengan penyusunan pola pidana baru. Silaisme dan standarisasi pidana merupakan upaya pendekatan terhadap keadilan.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2025-06-19 00:57:41
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Masalah Masalah Hukum journal (MMH) and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
MMH journal and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in MMH journal are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
We strongly encourage that manuscripts be submitted to online journal system in http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/index. Authors are required to create an account and submit the manuscripts online. For submission inquiries, please follow the submission instructions in the website. If the author has any problems on the online submission, please contact Editorial Office at the following email: jurnal.mmh@undip.ac.id or jurnal.mmh@gmail.com
Contributors are responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce any materials, including photographs and illustrations, for which they do not hold the copyright and for ensuring that the appropriate acknowledgments are included in the manuscript.
