PENGARUH KONDISI KEUANGAN, REPUTASI AUDITOR, DISCLOSURE, DAN OPINI AUDIT TAHUN SEBELUMNYA PADA PENGUNGKAPAN OPINI AUDIT GOING CONCERN

Anita Rahayuningsih

doi:10.14710/jaa.11.1.25-38

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jaa.11.1.25-38

PENGARUH KONDISI KEUANGAN, REPUTASI AUDITOR, DISCLOSURE, DAN OPINI AUDIT TAHUN SEBELUMNYA PADA PENGUNGKAPAN OPINI AUDIT GOING CONCERN

*Anita Rahayuningsih - Universitas Islam Nahdlatul Ulama’ Jepara, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{JAA9697,
    author = {Anita Rahayuningsih},
    title = {PENGARUH KONDISI KEUANGAN, REPUTASI AUDITOR, DISCLOSURE, DAN OPINI AUDIT TAHUN SEBELUMNYA PADA PENGUNGKAPAN OPINI AUDIT GOING CONCERN},
    journal = {JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN AUDITING},
  volume = {11},
    number = {1},
    year = {2014},
    keywords = {going concern opinion, the financial condition, reputation auditors, disclosure,},
    abstract = {Giving going concern status is not easy task because it is closely related to the auditor’s reputation. Public accountants are often judged both by society and the government to see whether or not the insolvent condition of the company being audited. By Mirna 2007, indicates that the auditor’s reputation at stake when providing an audit opinion. Going concern opinion should be expressed in the hope to speed up efforts to rescue the troubled company. This research was conducted on the real estate and property companies listed in Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) which has complete financial statements for the year 2009-2013. The method of sample selection in this research using purposive sampling method. The total of observational research (5 years) of 180 samples. Methods of analysis were performed logistic regression were processed with SPSS. The results showed that financial conditions had no significant effect on the disclosure of Going Concern Audit Opinion Wald value of 0.022 (wald)<1.97 (t-table) and the significance of 0883>0.05. While the auditor’s reputation, Disclosure, and the previous year’s audit opinion a significant effect on the disclosure of Going Concern Audit Opinion. auditor reputation value Wald 7823 (wald)>1.97 (t-table) and the significance 0.005<0.05, Wald value Disclosure 4713 (wald)>1.97 (t-table) and the significance 0.030<0.05, the previous year’s audit opinion the value of Wald 8264 (wald)>1.97 (t-table) and the significance 0.004 <0.05},
   issn = {2549-7650},   pages = {25--38}  doi = {10.14710/jaa.11.1.25-38},
    url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/akuditi/article/view/9697}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Giving going concern status is not easy task because it is closely related to the auditor’s reputation.
Public accountants are often judged both by society and the government to see whether or not
the insolvent condition of the company being audited. By Mirna 2007, indicates that the auditor’s
reputation at stake when providing an audit opinion. Going concern opinion should be expressed
in the hope to speed up efforts to rescue the troubled company. This research was conducted on
the real estate and property companies listed in Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) which has complete
financial statements for the year 2009-2013. The method of sample selection in this research
using purposive sampling method. The total of observational research (5 years) of 180 samples.
Methods of analysis were performed logistic regression were processed with SPSS. The results
showed that financial conditions had no significant effect on the disclosure of Going Concern
Audit Opinion Wald value of 0.022 (wald)<1.97 (t-table) and the significance of 0883>0.05.
While the auditor’s reputation, Disclosure, and the previous year’s audit opinion a significant
effect on the disclosure of Going Concern Audit Opinion. auditor reputation value Wald 7823
(wald)>1.97 (t-table) and the significance 0.005<0.05, Wald value Disclosure 4713 (wald)>1.97
(t-table) and the significance 0.030<0.05, the previous year’s audit opinion the value of Wald
8264 (wald)>1.97 (t-table) and the significance 0.004 <0.05

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: going concern opinion, the financial condition, reputation auditors, disclosure,

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Research Articles

Language : EN

In Volume 11, Nomor 1, Tahun 2014

Recent articles

ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR PENENTU KUALITAS AUDIT DENGAN MORAL JUDGMENT SEBAGAI PEMODERASI (STUDI PADA BPK RI PERWAKILAN PROVINSI MALUKU UTARA) PENGARUH KARAKTERISTIK KOMITE AUDIT DAN PERUSAHAAN TERHADAP KECURANGAN PELAPORAN KEUANGAN PROFESIONALISME AKUNTAN PENDIDIK : PERSPEKTIF ATAU TRIGER KUALITAS LULUSAN AKUNTANSI DI ERA MASYARAKAT EKONOMI ASEAN More recent articles

Most cited articles

PENGAWASAN IMPELEMENTASI “GREEN ACCOUNTING” BERBASIS UNIVERSITY SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES (USR) DI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SEMARANG SERTA STUDI KOMPARASI UNIVERSITAS SE-KOTA SEMARANG ANALYSIS OF RELATIONSHIP AMONG STAKEHOLDER PRESSURES, ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING USE, STRATEGY, AND INNOVATION: AN EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIA PENGARUH KARAKTERISTIK PEMERINTAH DAERAH TERHADAP KEPATUHAN PENGUNGKAPAN WAJIB DALAM LAPORAN KEUANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH (Studi Empiris pada Kabupaten/Kota di Indonesia) PENGUNGKAPAN TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL DAN KARAKTERISTIK CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PADA SEKTOR FINANSIAL DAPATKAH TEORI FRAUD TRIANGLE MENJELASKAN KECURANGAN DALAM LAPORAN KEUANGAN? More cited articles

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-07-29 23:14:53

No citation recorded.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).