DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.5.2.2020.231-244

DEVELOPMENT OF AN IDEAL MODEL BASED ON POSITIVISM AND ITS IMPLICATION TOWARDS LEGAL SCIENCE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT

*Yusriyadi Yusriyadi scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2020 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The development of legal science and law enforcement is one of the main issues in many countries. The focus of this writing is positivism and its implication towards legal science and law enforcement. Two problems are proposed in this writing there are the implication of positivism towards legal science and law enforcement and the development of legal science and law enforcement ideally. To analyze the problems, socio-legal concept and approach are applied. The analysis found that there is an implication of positivism towards legal science and law enforcement. The implication is more negative than positive. Legal science has turned into a practical science with scientific object limited to legal regulation (lege, lex), while law enforcement has turned into being formalistic and legalistic in nature, and no longer a search of justice and expediency. From the findings, it is concluded with a recommendation of an ideal model of legal science and enforcement, which is called integration/harmonization model. To achieve this ideal model, a change of mindset from mere formalistic-legalistic positivism into a new mindset of integration/harmonization of idealism, positivism, and sociological schools of thought is required.

.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Positivism; Implication; Legal Science; Law Enforcement; Integration Model

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
INDONESIAN DEATH PENALTY: SEEN FROM THE CONCEPT BASED ON HUMAN RIGHTS EFFORTS TO PROTECT CONSUMER’S SPIRITUAL RIGHTS IN ORGANIZING ISLAMIC MICROFINANCE INSTITUTIONS IN INDONESIA GREEN LOAN BANKS POLICY TO PROVIDE ENVIRONMENT FRIENDLY PROJECT More recent articles
Most cited articles
REGULATIONS FOR E-COMMERCE AGREEMENT ACCORDING TO ICT ACT AND TITLE III OF INDONESIAN CIVIL CODE BRIDGING THE GAPS : A PARADIGMATIC INSIGHT INTO PHILOSOPHY OF LAW LEGAL PERSPECTIVE ON ASEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY Index IMPLEMENTATION OF LEGAL PROTECTION BY THE GOVERNMENT IN ORDER TO EMPOWERMENT OF MICRO SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISE TO REALIZE THE JUSTICE ECONOMY (Research Study: The Office of Cooperative and Micro Small and Medium Enterprise Province of Central Java) More cited articles
  1. Apeldorn, L.J. van. Inleiding Tot de Studie van Het Nederlandse Recht (10th Ed). Pradnya Paramita, n.d
  2. Augsberg, I. “Reading Law: On Law as a Textual Phenomenon.” Law & Literature 22, no. 3 (2010): 37–41
  3. Cotterrell, R. Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in The Mirror of Social Theory. London: Routdledge, 2017
  4. Cross, F. B. “The New Legal Realism and Statutory Interpretation.” The Theory and Practice of Legislation 1, no. 1 (2013): 129–149
  5. Curzon, L.B. Jurisprudence, Estover (2nd Ed). London: Cavendish Publishing Limited, 1998
  6. Demiray, M. R. “Natural Law Theory, Legal Positivism, and the Normativity of Law.” The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms 20, no. 8 (2015): 807–826
  7. Dhall, A. “On the Philosophy and Legal Theory of Human Rights in Light of Quantum Holism.” Wold Futures 66, no. 1 (2010): 1–25
  8. Ehrlich, E ; Ziegert, K. A. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. London: Routdledge, 2017
  9. Frank, J. “Some Realism about Legislation.” The Theory and Practice of Legislation 1, no. 1 (2013): 173–187
  10. Hage, J. What Is Legal Validity? Lessons from Soft Law. Legal Validity and Soft Law. London: Springer, 2018
  11. Hames, J. B. ; Ekern, Y. Legal Research, Analysis, and Writing. London: Cengage Learning, 2014
  12. Mukhidin. “Hukum Progresif Sebagai Solusi Hukum Yang Mensejahterahterakan Rakyat.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 1, no. 3 (2014)
  13. Paulson, S. L. “Hans Kelsen on Legal Interpretation, Legal Cognition, and Legal Science Science.” Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 10, no. 2 (2019): 1–34
  14. Rahardjo, S. Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Kompas, 2007
  15. Ritzer, G. Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science, Translated by Alimandan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1992
  16. Spaak, T. “Legal Positivism, Conventionalism, and The Normativity of Law.” Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 9, no. 2 (2017): 1–26
  17. Tanuredjo. “Elegi Penegakan Hukum Kisah Sum Kuning, Prita, Hingga Janda Pahlawan.” Kompas. 2012
  18. Tripkovic, B. “Judicial Comparativism and Legal Positivism Judicial Comparativism and Legal Positivism.” Transnational Legal Theory 4, no. 2 (2014): 285–313
  19. Wignjosoebroto, S. Hukum: Metode Dan Dinamika Masalahnya. Jakarta: ELSAM-HUMA, 2002
  20. ———. Pergeseran Paradigma Dalam Kajian-Kajian Sosial Dan Hukum. Malang: Setara Press, 2013
  21. Zuliyah, S. ; T. Triwahyuningsih. “Moral Aspect in the Law Enforcement in Indonesia: Prophetic Perspective.” In In Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2018) Moral Vol. 251 Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 602–606, 2018

Last update:

  1. The Dichotomy of Approach in the Study of Legal Science: A Critical Review

    Nurul Qamar, Farah Syah Rezah. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4 (2), 2022. doi: 10.37276/sjh.v4i2.162

Last update: 2024-11-06 04:20:08

No citation recorded.