DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.6.2.2021.231-246

INTERPRETATION OF OPEN LEGAL POLICY BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGES IN JUDICIAL REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY THRESHOLDS

*Sholahuddin Al-Fatih orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
This study attempted to discuss the interpretation of open legal policy by constitutional judges in terms of reviewing legislation related to the legal norms of parliamentary thresholds. Through conceptual and statutory approaches, this study tries to examine the ways or models of interpretation conducted by constitutional judges. This research uses Aharon Barak's thinking on the concept of legal interpretation a benchmark and an analytical tool. The results of this study show that the interpretation conducted by the constitutional judge relating to a norm that is considered an open legal policy is appropriate. This research is expected to help academics and legal practitioners, especially with regard to election law to be able to dig deeper into models of legal interpretation, not only based on the idea of Aharon Barak but also by other thinkers or experts.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Interpretation; The Judge; Open Legal Policy; Parliamentary Threshold

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
KNOWING COMPANY SECRETS THROUGH EMPLOYEE POSTS ON SOCIAL MEDIA ASSESSING FISHERY LEGISLATION FOR GENDER EQUALITY AND EMPOWERMENT IN FISHERY COMMUNITIES IN INDONESIA SAFEGUARD RE-INVESTIGATION BY MADAGASCAR GOVERNMENT ON PASTA PRODUCTS FROM INDONESIA BASED ON GATT/WTO FRAMEWORK More recent articles
Most cited articles
MANAGEMENT, DISTRIBUTION, AND REDEMPTION OF VILLAGE FUND DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGES OF INDONESIA IN THE SOCIAL MEDIA ERA RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE PROVISION OF PEOPLE’S BUSINESS CREDIT AS IMPLEMENTATION OF PRUDENTIAL PRINCIPLES THE FUNCTION OF IDEAL LAW IN PREPARATION REGULATION LEGISLATION IN ORDER TO CREATING EQUITABLE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BRIDGING THE GAPS : A PARADIGMATIC INSIGHT INTO PHILOSOPHY OF LAW More cited articles
  1. Adelina, Adlina. “RELEVANSI AMBANG BATAS PARLEMEN (PARLIAMENTARY THRESHOLD) DENGAN SISTEM PRESIDENSIAL DI INDONESIA.” Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2018
  2. Ajie, Radita. “Batasan Pilihan Kebijakan Pembentuk Undang-Undang (Open Legal Policy) Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Berdasarkan Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legislation) Vol. 13, no. No.2 Juni (2016): 111–20
  3. Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin. “Akibat Hukum Regulasi Tentang Threshold DalamPemilihan Umum Legislatif Dan Pemilihan Presiden: Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 52/PUU-X/2012 Dan Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013.” Jurnal Yudisial 12, no. 1 (2019): 17–38. doi: 10.29123/jy.v12i1.258
  4. ———. “Eksistensi Threshold Dalam Pemilu Serentak.” Universitas Airlangga, 2016
  5. ———. “Electoral Regulation in Indonesia : Is It Modern Law ?” Unnes Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2020): 205–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v6i2.41627
  6. ———. “Implementasi Parliamentary Threshold Dalam Pemilihan Anggota Dprd Provinsi Dan Dprd Kabupaten/Kota.” Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (2018). doi: 10.21274/ahkam.2018.6.2.363-388
  7. ———. “Pembentukan Norma Ambang Batas Parlemen Dalam Perspektif Teori Kritis Jurgen Habermas.” Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) 1, no. 1 (2020): 24–37. doi: 10.22219/audito.v1i1.12783
  8. ———. “PENERAPAN THRESHOLD DALAM PEMILU.” Audito Comparative Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2020): 78–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/audito.v1i2.13973
  9. Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin, Muchammad Ali Safaat, and Muhammad Dahlan. “Reformulasi Parliamentary Threshold Yang Berkeadilan Dalam Pemilu Legislatif Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum, 2014, 20
  10. Anggraini, Titi. “Ambang Batas Parlemen Tinggi 7% Dinilai Berdampak Banyak Suara Sah Terbuang.” Detik News, 2020
  11. Ansori, Lutfil. “TELAAH TERHADAP PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD DALAM PEMILU SERENTAK 2019.” Jurnal Yuridis 4, no. 1 (2019): 15–27. doi: 10.35586/.v4i1.124
  12. Baihaki, M Reza, Fathudin Fathudin, and Ahmad Tholabi Kharlie. “Problematika Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka (Open Legal Policy) Masa Jabatan Hakim Konstitusi Open Legal Policy Problems in Constitutional Court Judges’ Tenure.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. september (2020): 652–75. doi: 10.31078/jk1739
  13. Barak, Aharon. Purposive Interpretation in Law. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2005
  14. Effendi, Agus. “Studi Komparatif Pengaturan Sistem Pemilihan Umum Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Di Indonesia.” Fiat Justisia 10, no. 2 (2017): 295–316. doi: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no2.746
  15. Erfandi, Erfandi. Parliamentary Threshold Dan HAM Dalam Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Malang: Setara Press, 2014
  16. Fauzani, Muhammad Addi, and Fandi Nu Rohman. “Urgensi Rekonstruksi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Memberikan Pertimbangan Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka (Open Legal Policy).” Justitia Et Pax: Jurnal Hukum 35, no. 5 (2019): 127–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v35i2.2501
  17. Fendabi, Vanu. “PENERAPAN AMBANG BATAS PRESIDENSIL (PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD) SEBAGAI KEBIJAKAN HUKUM TERBUKA DALAM PEMILIHAN UMUM DI INDONESIA (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor.53/PUUXV/ 2017).” UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2019
  18. Firdaus, Fahmi Ramadhan. “Apa Itu Open Legal Policy?” Pusat Pengkajian Pancasila Dan Konstitusi (PUSKAPSI) FH Universitas Jember, 2020
  19. Freeman, Michael. Human Rights; An Interdisciplinary Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2004
  20. Hamidi, Jazim. Hermeneutika Hukum: Sejarah, Filsafat, & Metode Tafsir. Malang: UB Press, 2011
  21. Henkin, Louis. “Is There a ‘Political Question’ Doctrine?” The Yale Law Journal 85, no. 5 (1976): 597–625. doi: 10.2307/795454
  22. Hiariej, Eddy O.S. Asas Legalitas & Penemuan Hukum Dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2009
  23. Husein, Harun. Pemilu Indonesia: Fakta, Angka, Analisis Dan Studi Banding. Jakarta: Perkumpulan untuk Pemilu dan Demokrasi (Perludem), 2014
  24. Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Edited by Ahsan Yunus. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2020
  25. Jati, Wasisto Raharjo. “Menuju Sistem Pemilu Dengan Ambang Batas Parlemen Yang Afirmatif.” Jurnal Yudisial 6, no. 2 (2013): 143–58
  26. Kholis, Nur. “PARLIAMENTARY THRESHOLD AND POLITICAL RIGHTS LIMITATION.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 1, no. 3 (2020): 445–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v1i3.36702
  27. Komisi Pemilihan Umum. “Partai Politik Peserta Pemilu 2019.” KPU RI, 2020
  28. Kompas. “Penetapan KPU: 9 Parpol Lolos Parlemen,” 2019
  29. Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy, Government Forms & Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. 2nd ed. Yale: Yale University Press, 2012
  30. Maftuh, Muh. Aziz. “PARLIAMENTARY THRESHOLD DALAM PEMILU SERENTAK TAHUN 2019 (Tinjauan Filosofis Asas Kedaulatan Rakyat).” IAIN Salatiga, 2020
  31. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014
  32. Mertokusumo, Sudikno, and A. Pitlo. Bab-Bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1993
  33. Pantazakos, Michael. “Ad Humanitatem Pertinent: A Personal Reflection On The History And Purpose Of The Law And Literature Movement.” Law & Literature 7, no. 1 (1995): 31–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.1995.11015763
  34. Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Cetakan ke. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017
  35. Putra, Erviando Pratama. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Ambang Batas Perolehan Suara Dalam Pemilihan Anggota Parlemen (Parliamentary Threshold) Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 52/PUU-X/2012.” Universitas Bangka Belitung, 2015
  36. Satriawan, Iwan, and Tanto Lailam. “Open Legal Policy Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 3 (2019): 559–84
  37. Scharpf, Fritz W. “Judicial Review and the Political Question: A Functional Analysis.” The Yale Law Journal 75, no. 4 (1966): 517–97. doi: 10.2307/794865
  38. Septian, Ilham Fajar. “Mengefektifkan Sistem Pemerintahan Dan Menyederhanakan Sistem Partai Politik: Belajar Kepada Pemilu Jerman.” Majalah Hukum Nasional 49, no. 2 (2019): 57–85. doi: 10.33331/mhn.v49i2.28
  39. Sodiki, Achmad. “Interpretasi Hukum.” 2020
  40. Sukma, Gardha Galang Mantara. “Open Legal Policy Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Bidang Politik Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Studi Terhadap Putusan MK Bidang Politik Tahun 2015-2017).” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 5, no. 1 (2020): 1–19. doi: 10.20885/jlr.vol5.iss1.art1
  41. Supriyanto, Didik, and August Mellaz. “Ambang Batas Perwakilan: Pengaruh Parliamentary Threshold Terhadap Penyederhanaan Sistem Kepartaian Dan Proporsionalitas Hasil Pemilu.” Jakarta, 2011
  42. Violla, Raden. “PENAFSIRAN ‘OPEN LEGAL POLICY’: STUDI TERHADAP PUTUSAN PENGUJIAN KONSTITUSIONALITAS UNDANG-UNDANG DI INDONESIA.” Universitas Padjajaran, 2018
  43. Wibowo, Mardian. Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Konsep Dan Kajian Dalam Pembatasan Kebebasan Pembentuk Undang-Undang). Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2019
  44. ———. “Menakar Konstitusionalitas Sebuah Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 2 (2016): 196. doi: 10.31078/jk1221

Last update:

  1. The Urgency of Administrative Law in Light of Ius Constituendum Regarding the Role of Village Heads

    Diding Rahmat, Sudarto Sudarto, Sarip Sarip, Sujono Sujono, Muhammad Faiz Aziz. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi, 2024. doi: 10.24090/volksgeist.v7i1.10204

Last update: 2024-11-20 10:49:37

No citation recorded.