skip to main content

UTILIZATION OF MEDIATION IN MEDICAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT DURING COVID 19 PANDEMIC

*Anggraeni Endah Kusumaningrum orcid  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Health services provided by doctors to patients during the COVID-19 pandemic can lead to medical disputes, such as the case of a patient who feels he has been infected with the virus even though the results of the PCR swab are negative, as well as the refusal of patients who are about to give birth because they have not had a PCR swab. Mediation can be used as an alternative to medical dispute resolution outside the court by involving the mediator in order to achieve a final result that is acceptable to the parties. This study uses a normative juridical approach and secondary data sources as the main data through primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and will be analyzed qualitatively. The obligation to carry out mediation in medical disputes is considered a faster and relatively inexpensive dispute resolution process and fulfills a sense of justice as regulated in Article 29 of Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health in accordance with Article 130 HIR and Article 154 Rbg that cases that do not take the Mediation procedure are a violation. To the provisions of HIR and Rbg. Similarly, PERMA No. 1/2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Court as a substitute for PERMA No. 1/2008.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Covid 19; Mediation; Utilization; Dispute Resolution

Article Metrics:

  1. Appludnopsanji, Appludnopsanji, and Ani Purwanti. "Double Track Criminal System of Indonesia: Criminal Sanction and Chemical Castration Treatment Policy on Pedhofilia?" Diponegoro Law Review 6, no. 1 (2021): 17–32. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.6.1.2021.17-32
  2. Diah Handayani, Dwi Rendra Hadi, Fathiyah Isbaniah, Erlina Burhan, Heidy Agustin. “Penyakit Virus Corona 2019.” JURNAL RESPIROLOGI INDONESIA 40, no. 2 (2020): 66–129
  3. Eddi Junaedi. "Opcit," 2011
  4. Foundation, Rilis Pers Lokataru. “Laporan Temuan (Sementara) Call Center Warga Sadar Corona.” Lokataru Foundation, 2020. https://lokataru.id/laporan-temuan-sementara-call-center-warga-sadar-corona/
  5. Head, John W. Pengantar Umum Hukum Ekonomi. Jakarta: Proyek ELIPS, 1997
  6. Katsarava, Zaza, Maka Mania, Christian Lampl, Johanna Herberhold, and Timothy J. Steiner. "Poor Medical Care for People with Migraine in Europe – Evidence from the Eurolight Study." Journal of Headache and Pain 19, no. 1 (2018): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0839-1
  7. Makassar, Kontributor, and Hendra Cipto. “Dinkes Makassar Panggil RS Yang Tolak Ibu Hamil Bersalin Karena Tak Punya Biaya Swab Test Halaman All - Kompas,” 2020. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2020/06/17/14104461/dinkes-makassar-panggil-rs-yang-tolak-ibu-hamil-bersalin-karena-tak-punya?page=all
  8. McTaggart, Ryan A., Sameer A. Ansari, Mayank Goyal, Todd A. Abruzzo, Barb Albani, Adam J. Arthur, Michael J. Alexander, et al. "Initial Hospital Management of Patients with Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion (ELVO): Report of the Standards and Guidelines Committee of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery." Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 9, no. 3 (2017): 316–23. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011984
  9. Muhlis Rijal, Syamsul, Indar Nambung, and Sabir Alwy. “Kekuatan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik Pasien Dengan Rumah Sakit Melalui Jalur Mediasi.” Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum 4, no. April (2020): 70–94. http://jurnal.untagsmg.ac.id/index.php/duniahukum/article/view/2004/1453
  10. Mulyadi, Deri. “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Kelalaian Medik Yang Berkeadilan Di Indonesia.” Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies 11, no. 2 (2020): 126–38
  11. “Pelapor Kasus Dugaan Malapraktik RS Telogorejo Semarang Klarifikasi Ke Polisi Halaman All - Kompas.” Kompas.com, 2021
  12. Prabandari, Dwi Resti, Achmad Busro, and Ery Agus Priyono. “Tinjauan Yuridis Wanprestasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2863K/PDT/2011.” Diponegoro Law Journal 8, no. 2 (2019): 1014–25
  13. Santoso, Arif Dian, Isharyanto, and Adi Sulistiyono. “Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia ( Mkdki ) Untuk Dapat Menjamin Keadilan Dalam Hubungan Dokter Dan Pasien.” Jurnal Pasca Sarjana Hukum UNS VII, no. 1 (2019): 29–38. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/hpe/article/view/29176/19848
  14. Septiyo, Tendy, Joko Setiyono, and Muchlas Rastra Samara. “Optimalisasi Penerapan Mediasi Penal Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana.” Jurnal Yuridis 7, no. 2 (2020): 209. https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v7i2.2122
  15. Sulistiono, Adi. Eksistensi & Penyelesaian Sengketa HaKI ( Hak Kekayaan Intelektual). Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press, 2008
  16. Suryono. Penyelesaian Sengketa Dugaan Malpraktek Tenaga Kesehatan, Pertemuan IBI Yogyakarta. RS Sardjito, 2010
  17. SYUKUR, Fatahillah A. “Mediasi Yudisial Di Indonesia; Peluang Dan Tantangan Dalam Memajukan Sistem Peradilan.” https://regional.kompas.com/. PADANG: Universitas Andalas, 2012.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.