skip to main content

A MODEL OF ISLAMIC PUBLIC FINANCE IN MALAYSIA’S CONSTITUTION

*Abdul Ghafar Ismail  -  Faculty of Economics and Muamalat, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Malaysia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study asks five questions. How does the Constitution define the framework for its governance and the principles under which it must operate? How do the provisions lay out the core public finance matters? How are Islamic religious defined? How could we interpret the provisions in the Constitution? How do Islamic religious revenues affect socioeconomic development? Based on the analysis of these questions, and the Federal Constitution of Malaysia, this study will try to explain the choice of alternative sets of legal-institutional-constitutional rules that constrain the choices and activities of economic and political agents (government). In particular, this study will prove that the Constitution results from both conventional and Islamic scholars' preferences. The constitutional rules lead to the introduction of Islamic religious revenues as the sources of government revenues. Furthermore, in Malaysia, constitutional economics also provides another view that treats Islamic religious revenues as socioeconomic development tools.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Fiscal Policy; Economic Development; Islamic Religious Revenues; Multilevel Governance; Federalism

Article Metrics:

  1. Akee, R., M. Jorgensen, and U. Sunde. “Constitutions and Economic Development: Evidence from the American Indian Nations.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 6754 July 2012, 2012
  2. Al-Qasim, Abu Ubayd. Al-Amwal. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiah, 1986
  3. Aras, O.N., and M. Öztürk. “Constitutional Economics, Fiscal Policy Rules, and The Case of Turkey.” International Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Studies 3, no. 2 (2011): 399–410
  4. Brennan, G., and J. Buchanan. The Power to Tax. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1980
  5. Buchanan, J. Constitutional Economics. Entry in The New Palgrave, Vol. 1: 588-595. London/Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1987
  6. ———. “The Domain of Constitutional Economics.” Constitutional Political Economy 1, no. 1 (1990): 1–18
  7. Buchanan, J., and G. Tullock. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962
  8. Burnham, W. “The Constitution - Capitalism and the Need for Rationalized Regulation.” In How Capitalistic Is the Constitution?, edited by R. Goldwin and W. Schambra, 75–105. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1982
  9. Elster, J. “The Impact of Constitutions on Economic Performance.” In Proceeding of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics. New York: World Bank, 1995
  10. Hayek, F. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1960
  11. Islam, M.A., M. Ebrahim, and Z. Yasin. “The Thirteenth Amendment To The Constitution Of Bangladesh (1996): A Critical Assessment.” Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 8, no. 2 (2019): 45–55
  12. Ismail, A.G., M.Z. Hamzah, and J.T. Ritonga. “Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: Evidence from Selected Muslim Countries.” Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan 9, no. 2 (2004): 109–16
  13. Ismail, A.G., B.T. Possumah, and M.N.A. Abdul Kadir. “Inter-Generational Transfer under Islamic Perspective.” Humanomics 30, no. 2 (2014): 95–121
  14. Ismail, A.G., M.H. Zaenal, and M.H.M. Shafiai. “Philanthrophy in Islam: A Promise to Welfare Economics System.” In IRTI Working Papers WP-1435-03, 2013. http://www.irti.org/English/Research/Documents/326.pdf
  15. Ismail, Abdul Ghafar. Money, Islamic Banking, and Real Economy. 2nd ed. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pte. Ltd., 2018
  16. Jin, J., and H.F. Zou. “How Does Fiscal Decentralization Affect Aggregate, National, and Subnational Government Size?” Journal of Urban Economics 52 (2002): 270–93
  17. Keynes, J.M. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Macmillan, 1936
  18. Martinez-Vazquez, J., and R.M. McNab. “Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth,” 2001
  19. McGuire, R., and R. Ohsfeldt. “Self-Interest, Agency Theory, and Political Voting Behavior: The Ratification of the United States Constitution.” American Economic Review 79, no. 1 (1989): 219–34
  20. McKenzie, R. “Introduction.” In Constitutional Economics - Containing the Economic Powers of Government, R.B. McKen. Lexington: Lexington Books, 1984
  21. Mueller, D. Public Choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989
  22. Person, T., and G. Tabellini. “Constitutions and Economic Policy.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18, no. 1 (2004): 75–98
  23. Streit, M. “The Freiburg School of Law and Economics.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 148 (1992): 675–704
  24. Vanberg, V.J. “Market and State: The Perspective of Constitutional Political Economy.” Journal of Institutional Economics 1, no. 1 (2005): 23–49
  25. Voigt, S. “Positive Constitutional Economics: A Survey.” Public Choice 90 (1997): 11–53
  26. ———. “Positive Constitutional Economics II - a Survey of Recent Developments.” Public Choice 146 (2011): 205–56
  27. Wit, Marc de, Jelmer Hoogzaad, Shyaam Ramkumar, Harald Friedl, and Annerieke Douma. “Circularity Gap Report.” Circle Economy, 2018

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-04-20 02:37:42

No citation recorded.