DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.7.1.2022.150-172

METHOD AND PRINCIPLE OF MARITIME BOUNDARY DELIMITATION BETWEEN STATES WITH OPPOSITE OR ADJACENT COASTS (CASE OF INDONESIA AND TIMOR-LESTE)

*Belardo Prasetya Mega Jaya  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
Ferina Ardhi Cahyani  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
Idris Idris  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Rika Ratna Permata  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
In the practice the maritime boundary delimitations can cause the overlap of claims between states with opposite or adjacent coasts. Regarding the maritime boundary between Indonesia and Timor-Leste, there was never a maritime boundary between both States, so it needs a settlement of disputes of maritime boundary delimitation between both parties. Therefore, these research aims to explain the methods and principles that could be used in resolving maritime boundary delimitation dispute between state with opposite or adjacent coasts based on international law and analyze how obstacles and solution to solve maritime boundary delimitation dispute between Indonesia and Timor-Leste (East Timor). This research uses normative legal research and Empirical Research Methods. The results of the research show that: (1) the maritime boundary delimitation between Indonesia and Timor-Leste uses enclaving, equidistant, and three-step approach method. (2), Indonesia and Timor Leste have the potential to determine maritime boundaries in the three areas, namely the area to the north of the Oecusse (Ombai Strait), to the north of Timor Island (Wetar Strait) and to the south of Timor Island (Timor Sea). Timor-Leste will still get a maritime territory in District Oecusse but the extent would be negotiated with Indonesia first, while in the Wetar Strait, the territorial sea division of the two countries would consider the outer islands of both countries.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Maritime Boundary; Delimitation; Opposite or Adjacent Coast
Funding: University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY ON THE ESTABLISHMENT LOCAL REGULATIONS ECO-TOURISM DEVELOPMENT NON-REFOULMENT PRINCIPLE AND PROHIBITION OF ENTRY FOR REFUGEES DUE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC THE LEGAL POLICY OF CITIZENSHIP IN FULFILLING THE RIGHTS OF STATELESS PERSONS AS AN EFFORT TO FULFILL HUMAN RIGHTS IN INDONESIA More recent articles
Most cited articles
IMPLEMENTATION OF LEGAL PROTECTION BY THE GOVERNMENT IN ORDER TO EMPOWERMENT OF MICRO SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISE TO REALIZE THE JUSTICE ECONOMY (Research Study: The Office of Cooperative and Micro Small and Medium Enterprise Province of Central Java) Index BRIDGING THE GAPS : A PARADIGMATIC INSIGHT INTO PHILOSOPHY OF LAW PROTECTION AND REHABILITATION FOR WOMEN VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE ACCORDING TO INDONESIAN LAW (STUDY ON CENTRAL JAVA GOVERNMENT'S HANDLING THROUGH KPK2BGA) SHARIA GOVERNANCE ON ISLAMIC BANKING: SPIRITUAL RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE ON CONSUMER PROTECTION IN INDONESIA More cited articles
  1. Arsana, I Made Andi. Batas Maritim Antarnegara: Sebuah Tinjauan Teknis Dan Yuridis. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2007
  2. ———. “Good Fences Make Good Neighbours: Challenges and Opportunities in Finalising Maritime Boundary Delimitation in the Malacca Strait Between Indonesia and Malaysia.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 12, no. 1 (2014)
  3. Bankes, Nigel. “Settling the Maritime Boundaries between Timor-Leste and Australia in the Timor Sea.” The Journal of World Energy Law & Business 11, no. 5 (2018): 387–409
  4. Churchill, R. R and A.V. Lowe. The Law of The Sea. Rev. ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press., 1999
  5. Decentralisation Support Facility. Master Plan Draft for the Management of Boundaries of Countries and Border Areas., 2011
  6. Deeley, N. “The International Boundary of East Timor.” Boundary and Territory Briefing 3, no. 5 (2001)
  7. Direktorat Jenderal Strategi Pertahanan. Optimizing the Handling of Maritime Border Area RI-RTDL in the Framework of Maintaining the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI). Jakarta, 2007
  8. Djalal, Hasjim. “Maritime Boundary Management and Border Area to Increase Sovereignty Indonesian.” Jurnal Pertahanan Vol 1, no. 1 (2018): 27–38. http://jurnal.idu.ac.id/files/journals/16/articles/252/public/252-1047-1-PB.pdf
  9. Evans, M.D. Maritime Boundary Delimitation, Oxford Handbook of The Law of The Sea. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005
  10. Hadiwijoyo, S.S. State Border, in International Legal Dimension. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2011
  11. Hankey, Blair, and Leonard Legault. “Method, Oppositeness and Adjacency, and Proportionality in Maritime Boundary Delimitation.” In International Maritime Boundaries, The American Society of International Law, 2022
  12. Hendrapati, Marcel. “Maritime Expansion and Delimitation After the Timor Gap Treaty.” Indonesia Law Review 5, no. 1 (2015): 69–87
  13. ITB Digital Library. “Indonesian Maritime Boundary Delimitation On the Eastern Segment of Singapore Using Equidistant Principles.” ITB Digital Library. Last modified 2015. http://digilib.itb.ac.id/files/disk1/454/jbptitbpp-gdl-muhammadha-22692-4-2012ta-3.pdf
  14. Lathrop, Coalter. “The Technical Aspects of International Maritime Boundary Delimitation, Depiction, And Recovery.” Ocean Development & International Law 28, no. 2 (1997)
  15. LPPM ITB. Final Report Preliminary Assessment of Indonesia-Timor-Leste Sea Boundary Delimitation. Bandung, 2002
  16. Maritime Boundary Office of Timor Leste. Timor-Leste’s Maritime Boundaries, Maritime Boundary Office of the Council for the Final Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries. TimorLeste, 2016. http://www.gfm.tl
  17. Monteiro, Seguito. “Yurisdiksi Negara Pantai Di Wilayah Delimitasi Maritim Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Yang Belum Ditetapkan Berdasarkan Ketentuan Hukum Laut Internasional (Study Di Timor Leste-Indonesia).” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 6, no. 1 (2020): 303–334
  18. Prescott, V and C. Schofield, and Schofield. The Maritime Political Boundaries of the World. Second Edi. London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers., 2005
  19. Ramon, Adrianus Adityo Vito. “Completing the Jigsaw: The Recent Development of the Maritime Boundaries in the Timor Sea.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 15, no. 4 (2018): 484
  20. Risal, Muhammad. “Tantangan Kedaulatan Maritim Indonesia Di Kemerdekaan Timor Leste.” eJournal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional 3, no. 2 (2015): 329–344
  21. Schneider, J. “The First ICJ Chamber Experiment: The Gulf of Maine Case: The Nature of an Equitable Result.” The American journal of International Law 79 (1985)
  22. Sumaryo, and I Made Arsana. Managing Indonesia’s Border in a Boundless World: Geo-Spatial Aspect of Indonesia’s International Maritime Border In Border Area Management. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2010
  23. Tzeng, Peter. “Moving Maritime Boundaries: Changes in Coastal Land Sovereignty, River Courses, Sea Levels, and Maritime Delimitation Law.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 15, no. 2 (2018)
  24. Wila, M. R.C. Konsepsi Hukum Dalam Pengaturan & Pengelolaan Wilayah Perbatasan Antarnegara. Bandung: Alumni, 2006

Last update:

  1. The resolution of unilateral claims and maritime features by other countries on Indonesia’s sovereign rights in the North Natuna Sea through the PAC to strengthen the maritime fulcrum in Indonesia

    Suryadi Suryadi, Irman Irman, Atika Thahira, Muhammad Fajar Hidayat, Irwandi Syahputra, Lia Nuraini, Ilhamda Fattah Kaloko, G. Jameson, I. Gibson, P. Doumenq, T. Yamamoto, T. Mare, H. Pardi. BIO Web of Conferences, 134 , 2024. doi: 10.1051/bioconf/202413408002

  2. Republic of Indonesia Sovereign Right in North Natuna Sea according to United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982

    Belardo Prasetya Mega Jaya, Agus Prihartono Permana Sidiq, Mohamad Fasyehhudin, Nuryati Solapari. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 16 (1), 2024. doi: 10.1080/18366503.2023.2206261

Last update: 2024-11-21 20:45:14

No citation recorded.