DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.9.1.2024.19-35

REDEFINING INDONESIA’S BLASPHEMY LAW IN THE DIGITAL AGE: A HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE

*Khansadhia Afifah Wardana  -  Doctor of Law Program, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Rahayu Rahayu scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Sukirno Sukirno scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This paper aims to examine the cascading impact of current conditions on the freedoms of expression and religious belief within Indonesia's online sphere, particularly amidst a rising trend of religious blasphemy cases. The dynamic nature of social interactions and discussions in cyberspace has fostered diverse interpretations influenced by subjective understandings of religion, often resulting in disputes of religious blasphemy. Employing a qualitative research method, the study analyses pertinent literary sources to provide insights into the practice of blasphemy laws and their detrimental effects on the freedoms of religion and expression. Indonesia, as a signatory of ICCPR and the Rabat Plan of Action, upholds constitutional guarantees of these freedoms. However, the current application of blasphemy regulations needs reform to better safeguard the rights of its citizens. By targeting laws that prohibit incitement to religious hatred, the legal framework can more effectively fulfill its primary objective of protecting people from discrimination and ensuring their dignity. This research underscores the urgency for Indonesia to recalibrate its approach to blasphemy laws, aligning them with international human rights standards. So that Indonesia can enhance its commitment to protecting freedom of expression and religious belief, fostering a more inclusive and rights-respecting environment for its diverse population.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Cyberspace; Religious Blasphemy; Freedom of Expression; Freedom of Religion

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
SECURING PERSONAL DATA IN E-KYC: VITAL FOR DIGITAL ECONOMY GROWTH ADAT NATIONAL PARK AS LEGAL POLITICS OF LIVING SPACE OF ANAK DALAM TRIBE ONE-PERSON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY: CONSIDERING COMPANY’S ORGAN GOVERNANCE OF THE INDONESIAN LEGAL ENTITIES FOR MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES More recent articles
Most cited articles
Index SHARIA GOVERNANCE ON ISLAMIC BANKING: SPIRITUAL RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE ON CONSUMER PROTECTION IN INDONESIA BRIDGING THE GAPS : A PARADIGMATIC INSIGHT INTO PHILOSOPHY OF LAW Index LEGAL PERSPECTIVE ON ASEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY More cited articles
  1. Ammerman, Nancy T., ed. Everyday Religion: Observing Modern Religious Lives. Oxford University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305418.001.0001
  2. Asfinawati, and Aditia Bagus Santoso. “Laporan YLBHI Tentang Penodaan Agama Januari-Mei 2020.” Jakarta: Yayasan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Indonesia, 2020. https://ylbhi.or.id/bibliografi/laporan/laporan-ylbhi-tentang-penodaan-agama-januari-mei-2020/
  3. Bräuchler, Birgit. “Cyberidentities at War: Religion, Identity, and the Internet in the Moluccan Conflict.” Indonesia, no. 75 (2003): 123–51
  4. Clarke, Ben. “Freedom of Speech and Criticism of Religion: What Are the Limits?” eLaw Journal 14, no. 2 (2007): 94–121
  5. Crouch, Melissa A. “Law and Religion in Indonesia: The Constitutional Court and the Blasphemy Law.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 7 (2011): 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2194607800000582
  6. Dahm, Bernhard. Sukarno and the Struggle for Indonesian Independence. Cornell University Press, 1969
  7. Dawson, Lorne L., and Douglas E. Cowan. Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet. Routledge, 2004
  8. Djafar, Wahyudi, and Justitia Avila Veda. Internet Untuk Semua: Mengintegrasikan Prinsip Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Pengaturan Internet Di Indonesia. Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat, 2014
  9. Farr, Thomas F. “The Widow’s Torment: International Religious Freedom and American National Security in the 21st Century.” Drake Law Review 57 (2009): 851–72
  10. Fraser, Matthew, and Soumitra Dutta. Throwing Sheep in the Boardroom: How Online Social Networking Will Transform Your Life, Work and World. John Wiley & Sons, 2010
  11. George, Cherian. Hate Spin: The Manufacture of Religious Offense and Its Threat to Democracy. MIT Press, 2016
  12. Hacker, Kenneth L, and Jan van Dijk. Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice. Sage, 2000
  13. Henderson, Kerrie. “Blasphemy in a Pluralistic Society.” Communications Law Bulletin 11, no. 4 (1992): 24
  14. Holzaepfel, Caleb. “Can I Say That?: How an International Blasphemy Law Pits the Freedom of Religion Against the Freedom of Speech.” Emory International Law Review 28, no. 1 (2014): 597–648
  15. Jahangir, Asma. “Report of the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, Asma Jahangir, and the Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, Doudou Diène, Further to Human Rights Council Decision 1/107 on Incitement to Racial and Religious Hatred and the Promotion of Tolerance.” A/HRC/2/3 (United Nations Human Rights Council, 2006), para. 37, 2006. https://www.refworld.org/reference/themreport/unhrc/2006/en/23862
  16. Juniarto, Damar. “Menyoal Demokrasi Digital Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Dialog Kebijakan Publik 22 (2016): 28–35
  17. Molaei, Hamideh. “The Prospect of Civility in Indonesians’ Online Polarized Political Discussions.” Asian Journal of Communication 24, no. 5 (September 3, 2014): 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2014.917116
  18. Moore, Martin. Tech Giants and Civic Power Centre for the Study of Media. The Policy Institute, King’s College London, 2016. https://apo.org.au/node/64837
  19. Parmar, Sejal. “The Rabat Plan of Action.” In Free Speech and Censorship around the Globe, 211–31. Central European University Press, n.d. https://www.ceeol.com/search/chapter-detail?id=429548
  20. Postill, John, and Leonard Chrysostomos Epafras. “Indonesian Religion as a Hybrid Media Space: Social Dramas in a Contested Realm.” Asiascape: Digital Asia 5, no. 1–2 (February 14, 2018): 100–123. https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-12340086
  21. Rahman, Fazlur. “Religious Blasphemy in Indonesian Digital Public Sphere: The Intersection between Civility, Authority, and Ideology.” In Religion, State, and Society: Exploration of Southeast Asia, edited by Suyatno Ladiqi, Ismail Suardi Wekke, and Cahyo Seftyono. Semarang: Political Science Program Department of Politics and Civics Education Universitas Negeri Semarang, 2017
  22. Rumadi, Rumadi. “Antara Kebebasan Dan Penodaan Agama: Menimbang Proyek ‘Jalan Tengah’ Mahkamah Konstitusi RI Tentang UU Penodaan Agama.” Jurnal Indo-Islamika 2, no. 2 (2012): 245–71. https://doi.org/10.15408/idi.v2i2.1177
  23. Sheeran, Scott, Nigel S Rodley, and Scott Sheeran. Routledge Handbook of International Human Rights Law. Routledge London, 2013
  24. Telle, Kari. “Faith on Trial: Blasphemy and ‘Lawfare’ in Indonesia.” Ethnos 83, no. 2 (March 15, 2018): 371–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2017.1282973
  25. Temperman, Jeroen. “Blasphemy, Defamation of Religions and Human Rights Law.” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 26, no. 4 (December 1, 2008): 517–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934410802600403
  26. Uddin, Asma T. “The Indonesian Blasphemy Act: A Legal and Social Analysis.” In Sacrilegious Expression in a Multicultural Age, edited by Christopher S. Grenda, 223–48. University of California Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520958227-011

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-07-18 11:13:43

No citation recorded.