skip to main content

DIVORCE SETTLEMENT THROUGH MEDIATION PROCESS IN LHOKSEUMAWE SHARIA COURT

*Faisal Faisal orcid scopus publons  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Malikussaleh, Indonesia
Muhammad Helmi MD Said  -  Faculty of Law, National University of Malaysia, Malaysia
Manfarisyah Manfarisyah  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Malikussaleh, Indonesia
Jumadiah Jumadiah  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Malikussaleh, Indonesia
Herinawati Herinawati  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Malikussaleh, Indonesia
Dara Quthni Effida  -  Law Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Teuku Umar, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of mediators in resolving divorce cases based on the Supreme Court Regulation on Mediation Procedures and the function of mediators to reduce divorce rates. The type of research is empirical juridical, and primary data, and secondary adopts a juridical approach.. This research reveals that the implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 at the Lhokseumawe Sharia Court has not been maximized so it is necessary to strengthen the education of the judges-mediator regarding how judges handle mediation. In addition, a persuasive approach is needed so that mediation can be run effectively to prevent divorce. The mediator has to maximize his role in reconciling the litigants in the Court so that the parties do not consider mediation as a mere formality. Socialization is needed in the community regarding the importance of resolving disputes peacefully as determined under supreme court regulation.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Judges-Mediator; Divorce; Sharia Court

Article Metrics:

  1. Adiyono. “Mediasi Sebagai Upaya Hakim Menekan Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama.” AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 8, no. 1 (2014): 126. https://doi.org/10.19105/ihkam.v8i1.344
  2. Akni, Rigea Rima. “Mediasi Hubungan Industrial Yang Melebihi Batas Waktu.” Lentera Hukum 2, no. 3 (2015): 160–61. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/ejlh/article/view/8822/8845
  3. Andaryuni, Lilik, and Ratu Haika. “Efektivitas Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan Dalam Menekan Angka Cerai Di Pengadilan Agama.” Fenomena 10, no. 2 (2018): 95–116. https://doi.org/10.21093/fj.v10i2.1231
  4. Asmara, Musda, and Reti Andira. “Urgensi Talak Di Depan Sidang Pengadilan Perspektif Maslahah Mursalah.” Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam 3, no. 2 (2018): 207. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v3i2.626
  5. Bahrun, Bahrun, Syahrizal Abbas, and Iman Jauhari. “Peranan Hakim Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian Di Mahkamah Syar’iyah.” Syiah Kuala Law Journal 2, no. 3 (2018): 371–87. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v2i3.11718
  6. Baranyanan, Soeleman Djaiz. “Simplification of Law Regulations in Copyright Criminal Act Settlement.” Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System 1, no. 2 (2021): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v1i2.9
  7. Djawas, Mursyid, Abidin Nurdin, Muslim Zainuddin, Idham, and Zahratul Idami. “Harmonization of State, Custom, and Islamic Law in Aceh: Perspective of Legal Pluralism.” Hasanuddin Law Review 10, no. 1 (2024): 64–82. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v10i1.4824
  8. Farhan Asyhadi. “Efektivitas Mediasi Dalam Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Karawang.” Justisi Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (2019): 32–48. https://doi.org/10.36805/jjih.v4i1.642
  9. Jamilah, F. “Peranan Hakim Sebagai Mediator Di Pengadilan Agama Surabaya Dalam Menangani Kasus Perceraian.” Iqtisodina 3, no. 2 (2020): 84. http://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/madura/index.php/IQTISODINA/article/view/4971%0Ahttp://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/madura/index.php/IQTISODINA/article/download/4971/3295
  10. Jamilus. “Optimalisasi Mediasi Kekayaan Intelektual Di Kementerian Hukum Dan HAM.” De Jure 20, no. 1 (2020). https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/1617471
  11. Jonaedi Efendi, Johnny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normative Dan Empiris. Depok: prenadamedia group, 2018
  12. Karmawan. “Mediation in The Religious Courts of Indonesia.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 20, no. 1 (2020): 79–96. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v20i1.13249
  13. Masriandi. “Jumlah Isteri Yang Gugat Cerai Suami Meningkat Di Lhokseumawe Ini Penyebabnya.” Kompas. April 14, 2022. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2021/10/11/151301378/jumlah-istri-yang-gugat-cerai-suami-meningkat-di-lhokseumawe-ini
  14. Novita Otaya. “Tugas Dan Fungsi Mediator Dalam Mengurangi Angka Perceraian (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Agama Kotamobagu) 1.” Lex P 2, no. 2 (2014): 92. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/4534
  15. Nurhasanah. “The Analysis of Causes of Divorce by Wives.” COUNS-EDU: The International Journal of Counseling and Education 2, no. 4 (2017): 192–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23916/002017027240
  16. Nurjanah, Siti. “Divorce and Its Impact on Custody of Minors Using Islamic Law Perspectives.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (2022): 119–40. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.4156
  17. Nusanto, Irfan Ardyan. “Analisis Terhadap Dualitas Peraturan Menteri Dalam Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 4, no. 1 (2021): 53–68. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i1.4245
  18. Rahmah, Dian Maris. “Optimalisasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 4, no. 1 (2019): 1. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v4i1.174
  19. Rizky, Rizky Kurniyana, and Muchamad Coirun Nizar. “Tingkat Keberhasilan Mediasi Oleh Hakim Dan Non-Hakim Di Pengadilan Agama Purwodadi Tahun 2019.” ADHKI: Journal of Islamic Family Law 3, no. 1 (2021): 69–82. https://doi.org/10.37876/adhki.v3i1.47
  20. Rumadan, Ismail, and Ummu Salamah. “Settlement of Divorce Dispute Through the Forum of Mediation in Judicial Institutions As an Effort of Legal Protection for the Rights and Interests of the Child of Post-Divorce.” Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran 21, no. 2 (2021): 213–26. https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v21i2.4603
  21. Setyowati, Dewi, Emmilia Rusdiana. “Relevance of Criminal Law Formulation in The Law of Domestic Violence Elimination in Indonesia.” JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) 5, no. 1 (2020): 57–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i1.35362
  22. Sururie, Ramdani Wahyu. “Implementasi Mediasi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Agama.” Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 12, no. 2 (2012): 145. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v12i2.145-164
  23. Triana, Nita. “Urgensitas Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama Purbalingga.” Law Reform: Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 15, no. 2 (2019): 239–57. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i2.26184
  24. Ulfi, Tb. Ahmad. “Efektivitas Mediasi Dalam Mencegah Perceraian Dan Kaitannya Dengan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2008 (Studi Di Pengadilan Agama Serang).” Bil Dalil 1, no. 1 (2016): 1–32. http://jurnal.uinbanten.ac.id/index.php/bildalil/article/view/123/125
  25. Ummah, Nurul, Fifik Wiryani, and Mokhammad Najih. “Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik Dokter Dengan Pasien (Analisis Putusan Pn No. 38/Pdt.G/2016/Pn.Bna Dan Putusan Mahkah Agung No. 1550 K/Pdt/2016).” Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 27, no. 2 (2019): 205–21. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v27i2.10158
  26. Usman, Bustamam. “Peranan Mediator Dalam Memediasi Perkara Perceraian.” Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial 7, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.22373/dusturiyah.v8i1.3415
  27. Utama, Meria, and Irsan. “General Overview on Selecting and Drafting Construction Contract Disputes Resolution.” Sriwijaya Law Review 2, no. 2 (2018): 152–59. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol2.iss2.129.pp152-169

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-12-26 02:29:43

No citation recorded.