skip to main content

ILLEGAL LOGGING ENFORCEMENT: DYNAMICS OF PENAL SANCTIONS IN KEBUMEN COURT

*Budiyono Budiyono  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Jendral Soedirman, Indonesia
Linert Lirëza  -  Faculty of Political Sciences and Law, University Aleksandër Moisiu of Durrës, Albania
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This research investigates the multifaceted nature of criminal punishment, considering its purposes such as deterrence, retribution, rehabilitation, and the maintenance of societal order. Specifically focusing on Article 78, paragraph 15 of forestry law, which delineates penal sanctions, the study explores the application of confiscatory penalties in cases of forestry offenses, particularly illegal logging. The research centers on the practices of the Kebumen District Court in enforcing sanctions against illicit logging, examining the discretionary powers exercised by judges. Despite the existence of the 2005 Judicial and Court Management Technical Instructions governing evidence seizure in illegal logging cases which constrain judicial authority in sentencing. Adopting a non doctrinal research through interview to the judges and literature research as data collection. Those data are analysed qualitatively. the study reveals intricate challenges in penalty enforcement at the Kebumen District Court, encompassing imprisonment, fines, and the confiscation of forest products. Notably, disagreements among judges regarding adherence to Supreme Court guidelines highlight the complexities of balancing judicial autonomy with technical directives. The findings underscore the need for clarifying legal frameworks and enhancing judicial training to harmonize the application of penalties in forestry crime cases, thereby ensuring consistency and fairness in sentencing practices.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Criminal Punishment; Forestry Crimes; Judicial Discretion; Supreme Court Guidelines; Illegal Logging; Legal Interpretation

Article Metrics:

  1. Ariefianto, Yuniar. “Challenge Indonesia’s Regulation of International Crime in Illegal Logging.” Journal of Morality and Legal Culture 2, no. 1 (2021): 28–36. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmail.v2i1.62299
  2. Beyleveld, Deryck, and Roger Brownsword. “The Practical Difference between Natural-Law Theory and Legal Positivism.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 5, no. 1 (1985): 1–32
  3. Dekiawati, Erla Sari. “Law Enforcement of Illegal Logging in Indonesia: Problems and Challenges in Present and the Future.” Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development 1, no. 1 (January 31, 2022): 47–68. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijel.v1i1.56777
  4. Fallon, Richard H. “‘The Rule of Law’ as a Concept in Constitutional Discourse.” Columbia Law Review 97, no. 1 (1997): 1–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123446
  5. Fletcher, George P., and Steve Sheppard. American Law in a Global Context: The Basics. Oxford University Press, 2005
  6. Hamzah, Andi. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Yarsif Watampone, 2005
  7. Hansen, Mogens Herman. “The Mixed Constitution Versus the Separation of Powers: Monarchical and Aristocratic Aspects of Modern Democracy.” History of Political Thought 31, no. 3 (2010): 509–31
  8. Hart, H. L. A. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” Harvard Law Review 71, no. 4 (1958): 593–629. https://doi.org/10.2307/1338225
  9. Lamintang, P. A. F., and Theo Theo Lamintang. Delik-Delik Khusus Kejahatan Terhadap Nyawa, Tubuh, Dan Kesehatan. Sinar Grafika, 2023
  10. Lamintang, P.A.F. Hukum Penetensier Indonesia. Armico, 1984
  11. Lamintang, P.A.F., and Franciscus Theojunior Lamintang. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika, 2022
  12. Lasmadi, Sahuri, Elly Sudarti, and Nys Arfa. “Asset Seizure of Money Laundering Crimes Arising from Corruption in the Perspective of Legal Certainty and Justice.” Pandecta Research Law Journal 18, no. 2 (2023): 352–74. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v18i2.48568
  13. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2017
  14. Möllers, Christoph. “Division of Powers: Traditions and Meanings.” In The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers, edited by Christoph Moellers, 0. Oxford University Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602117.003.0002
  15. Muladi. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit, Universitas Diponegoro, 1995
  16. Simons, Kenneth W. “Is Strict Criminal Liability in the Grading of Offences Consistent with Retributive Desert?” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32, no. 3 (2012): 445–66
  17. Sukestini, Erna, Achmad Noor Fatirul, and Hartono Hartono. “Problem Based Learning with ICT Based with Learning Creativity to Improve History Learning Achievement.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran 53, no. 3 (September 28, 2020): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v53i1.24127
  18. Susanto, Heri, Ramlani Lina Sinaulan, and Mohamad Ismed. “Legal Certainty Regarding the Imposition of Criminal Extortion Sanctions Involving Community Organizations (ORMAS).” Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (Polri) 1, no. 2 (April 1, 2022): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i2.152
  19. Tacconi, Luca, Rafael J. Rodrigues, and Ahmad Maryudi. “Law Enforcement and Deforestation: Lessons for Indonesia from Brazil.” Forest Policy and Economics 108 (November 2019): 101943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.029
  20. Tonry, Michael H., and Richard S. Frase, eds. Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2001
  21. Weisst, Gunther A. “The Enchantment of Codification in the Common-Law World.” Yale Journal of International Law 25 (2000): 435–532
  22. Wibawa, G.M. Angga Satrya, Moh. Muhibbin, and Budi Parmono. “Criminal Actions Of Illegal Logging In The Perspective Of Forestry Law.” International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources 3, no. 1 (July 4, 2023): 84–95. https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v3i1.55
  23. Wijayanta, Tata. “Asas Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Putusan Kepailitan Pengadilan Niaga.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 14, no. 2 (May 25, 2014): 216–26. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.2.291

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-10-28 21:07:22

No citation recorded.