DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.10.2.2025.199-215

FAST TRACK LEGISLATION WITHOUT A LEGAL TRACK: A COMPARATIVE CRITIQUE OF ACCELERATED LAW-MAKING IN INDONESIA AND OTHER JURISDICTIONS

*Kaharuddin Kaharuddin  -  Faculty of law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia
Oemar Moechthar orcid scopus publons  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Agus Sekarmadji  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Dinar Karunia  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Dwi Rahayu Kristianti  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Ekawestri Prajwalita Widianti  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Ave Maria Frisa Katherina  -  Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Australia
Yogi Hidayat  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study critically examines the trend of "fast-track legislation" in Indonesia, particularly focusing on the Omnibus Law on Job Creation, the IKN Law, and the 2024 Constitutional Court Law. While fast-track legislation is often used as a tool for crisis management, Indonesia’s approach raises significant concerns due to its lack of a formal procedural framework. Unlike mature democracies such as the United Kingdom, the United States, and New Zealand, which have regulated systems for expedited law-making, Indonesia’s fast-track process is largely unregulated and accelerates policy changes without proper public scrutiny. The study uncovers a troubling pattern where speed becomes a substitute for thorough deliberation, leading to a democratic deficit and allowing executive power to bypass essential checks and balances. By comparing Indonesia’s practices with those of established democracies, the research highlights that fast-track mechanisms can be effective when guided by clear legal standards, judicial review, and transparency. However, Indonesia’s current system risks undermining democratic accountability, as urgency is often used as a tool to avoid public participation and scrutiny. The article concludes by calling for the urgent codification of a transparent, participatory framework for expedited legislation within Indonesia’s existing legal structures. This framework should define criteria for urgency, ensure procedural safeguards, and prioritize public involvement, ultimately ensuring that the pursuit of speed does not come at the cost of democratic integrity.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Fast Track Legislation; Accelerated Law-making; Comparative Law; Democratic Process; Public Participation

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
NAVIGATING FATWA-TO-REGULATION TRANSFORMATION IN ISLAMIC FINANCE: CHALLENGES AND INNOVATIONS POST-OMNIBUS LAW 2023 EXPLORING INTERSECTIONALITY: THE LEGAL CHALLENGES FACED BY INDIGENOUS WOMEN IN PALM OIL LAND CONFLICTS FAST TRACK LEGISLATION WITHOUT A LEGAL TRACK: A COMPARATIVE CRITIQUE OF ACCELERATED LAW-MAKING IN INDONESIA AND OTHER JURISDICTIONS More recent articles
Most cited articles
Index BRIDGING THE GAPS : A PARADIGMATIC INSIGHT INTO PHILOSOPHY OF LAW PROTECTION AND REHABILITATION FOR WOMEN VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE ACCORDING TO INDONESIAN LAW (STUDY ON CENTRAL JAVA GOVERNMENT'S HANDLING THROUGH KPK2BGA) THE FUNCTION OF IDEAL LAW IN PREPARATION REGULATION LEGISLATION IN ORDER TO CREATING EQUITABLE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT, DISTRIBUTION, AND REDEMPTION OF VILLAGE FUND More cited articles
  1. Ahdout, Z. Payvand. “Enforcement Lawmaking and Judicial Review.” Harvard Law Review 135, no. 4 (2022): 937–1006. https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-135/enforcement-lawmaking-and-judicial-review/
  2. Ambroziak, Adam A. “Strategy for the Re-Launching of the EU Internal Market in Response to the Economic Crisis, 2008-2010.” Yearbook of Polish European Studies 14 (2011): 27–54. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=146630
  3. Anggi M. Lubis, and Robby Irfany Maqoma. “Why Should We Trust the Government with Our Hard-Earned Money?” TheJakartaPost, 2025. https://www.thejakartapost.com/opinion/2025/03/18/why-should-we-trust-the-government-with-our-hard-earned-money.html
  4. Aulia, Yassar, Ali Abdurahman, and Mei Susanto. “Fundamental Principles of the Legislation Process.” Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah 6, no. 1 (April 2021): 41–64. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v6i1.109
  5. Casey, Christopher A., and Cathleen D. Cimino-Isaacs. “Trade Promotion Authority (TPA).” Congress.Gov, 2024. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF10038
  6. Christian, Ben, and Dirk Peters. “Establishing Trust and Distrust When States Leave International Organisations: The Case of Brexit.” Journal of European Public Policy 32, no. 5 (May 2025): 1253–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2319720
  7. Colin-Jaeger, Nathanaël, and Lucie Reed. “Survey Article: ‘Democracy in Crisis?’ Evaluating Deliberative Innovations in the French Context.” Halshs-05030354, 2025. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-05030354v1/document
  8. Danja, Isah Ibrahim, and Xingping Wang. “Matching Comparative Advantages to Special Economic Zones for Sustainable Industrialization.” Heliyon 10, no. 14 (July 2024): e34411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34411
  9. Du, Jun, Oleksandr Shepotylo, and Xiaocan Yuan. “How Did the Brexit Uncertainty Impact Services Exports of UK Firms?” Journal of International Business Policy 8, no. 1 (March 2025): 80–104. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-024-00202-6
  10. Fergusson, Ian F., Mark A. McMinimy, and Brock R. Williams. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Negotiations and Issues for Congress. 2015. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/items/0f722c23-872c-4d55-884c-9db77120cd3a
  11. Fukuyama, Francis. Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2020
  12. Geddis, Andrew. “Parliamentary Government in New Zealand: Lines of Continuity and Moments of Change.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 14, no. 1 (January 2016): 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mow001
  13. Geiringer, Claudia, Polly Higbee, and Elizabeth McLeay. What Is the Hurry?: Urgency in the New Zealand Legislative Process 1987-2010. Wellington: Victoria University Press, 2011
  14. Guzman, Andrew T. “The Design of International Agreements.” European Journal of International Law 16, no. 4 (September 2005): 579–612. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi134
  15. Hobbs, Harry, and George Williams. “Australian Parliaments and the Pandemic.” UNSW Law Journal 46, no. 4 (2023): 1314–55. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.451279210119787
  16. Huda, Ni’matul, Idul Rishan, and Dian Kus Pratiwi. “Fast-Track Legislation: The Transformation of Law-Making Under Joko Widodo’s Administration.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 13, no. 1 (2024): 117–33. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v13i1.71061
  17. Imwinkelried, E.J. “A Comparative Law Analysis of the Standard for Admitting Scientific Evidence: The United States Stands Alone.” Forensic Science International 42, nos. 1–2 (July 1989): 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(89)90195-3
  18. Indonesia, Constitutional Court of the Republic of. “Origin of Perppu and State of Emergency in Constitutional Law.” 2023. https://en.mkri.id/news/details/2023-07-28/Origin_of_Perppu_and_State_of_Emergency_in_Constitutional_Law
  19. Jacobi, Tonja, and Jeff VanDam. “The Filibuster and Reconciliation: The Future of Majoritarian Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate.” University of California Davis Law Review 47 (2013): 261–342. https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/faculty-articles/13/
  20. Javaid, Mohd, Abid Haleem, Ravi Pratap Singh, and Anil Kumar Sinha. “Digital Economy to Improve the Culture of Industry 4.0: A Study on Features, Implementation and Challenges.” Green Technologies and Sustainability 2, no. 2 (May 2024): 100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.grets.2024.100083
  21. Kaharuddin, Dinar Karunia, Oemar Moechthar, and Ave Maria Frisa Katherina. “Omnibus Law in the Dynamics of Constitutional Law: A Comparative Research of Indonesia, The United States, The Philippines, and Canada.” Administrative and Environmental Law Review 6, no. 1 (2025): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v6i1.4054
  22. Khedr, Ahmed M., and Sheeja Rani S. “Enhancing Supply Chain Management with Deep Learning and Machine Learning Techniques: A Review.” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 10, no. 4 (December 2024): 100379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100379
  23. Kirschner, Eli J. “Fast Track Authority and Its Implication for Labor Protection in Free Trade Agreement.” Cornell International Law Journal 44, no. 2 (2011): 385–415. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol44/iss2/5/
  24. Körösényi, András, Gábor Illés, and Rudolf Metz. “Contingency and Political Action: The Role of Leadership in Endogenously Created Crises.” Politics and Governance 4, no. 2 (June 2016): 91–103. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i2.530
  25. Lords, Authority of the House of. Fast-Track Legislation: Constitutional Implications and Safeguards Volume I: Report. London, 2009
  26. Machin, Amanda. “Climates of Democracy: Skeptical, Rational, and Radical Imaginaries.” WIREs Climate Change 13, no. 4 (July 2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.774
  27. Majeed, Nasid, Amjad Hilal, and Arshad Nawaz Khan. “Doctrinal Research in Law: Meaning, Scope and Methodology.” Bulletin of Business and Economics 12, no. 4 (2021): 559–63. https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00167
  28. Mariyam, Siti, Adhi Satria, and Markus Suryoutomo. “The Making of Law in Indonesia: A Criticism and Evaluation of The Practise of Legislative Function in The House of Representatives.” Law Reform 16, no. 2 (September 2020): 215–23. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v16i2.33773
  29. Masefield, Sarah C., Alan Msosa, Florence Kasende Chinguwo, and Jean Grugel. “Stakeholder Engagement in the Health Policy Process in a Low Income Country: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Perceptions of the Challenges to Effective Inclusion in Malawi.” BMC Health Services Research 21, no. 1 (September 2021): 984. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07016-9
  30. McLeay, Elizabeth, Claudia Geiringer, and Pollu Higbee. “Urgent’ Legislation in the New Zealand House of Representatives and the Bypassing of Select Committee Scrutiny.” Policy Quarterly 8, no. 2 (2012): 12–22. https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v8i2.4414
  31. M.D., Pradeep. “Legal Research- Descriptive Analysis on Doctrinal Methodology.” International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences, December 6, 2019, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.47992/IJMTS.2581.6012.0075
  32. Miladmahesi, Rosita, Wicipto Setiadi, Diani Sadiawati, and Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar. “The Possibility of the Implementation of Fast-Track Legislation in Indonesia.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 10, no. 1 (2023): 101–21. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n1.a6
  33. Mudey, Mohamed Hassan, and Rozita Arshad. “Corruption Impedes Good Governance in Somalia’s Public Sector.” Journal of Financial Crime 32, no. 3 (March 2025): 706–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-07-2024-0225
  34. Perdana, Anugerah, Carolus Boromeus Enggal, Raden Mahdum, and Erna Listiawati. “Reformulation of Public Participation in Fast- Track Legislation in an Open Cumulative National Legislative Program.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 4 (December 2023): 678–703. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2047
  35. Prasetyo, Juliantz Ilham. “Aktualisasi Fast Track Legislation Di Berbagai Negara Serta Pengadopsian Metodenya Pada Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” National Journal of Law 8, no. 2 (2024): 122–53
  36. Putri, Fayreizha Destika, and Ani Purwanti. “Legal Politics in the Amendment of Regional Head Electoral Law.” Diponegoro Law Review 3, no. 1 (April 2018): 122. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.3.1.2018.122-131
  37. Rosenau, James N. “A Pre-Theory Revisited: World Politics in an Era of Cascading Interdependence.” International Studies Quarterly 28, no. 3 (September 1984): 245. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600632
  38. Sakuntala, S. Sri, Srinivas Sarakanam, Avinash Dhavan, Rashi Taggar, and Garima Kohli. “The Complexity of Corruption and Recent Trends in Information Technology for Combating Corruption in India.” Public Administration and Policy 27, no. 2 (September 2024): 126–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-05-2023-0058
  39. Saraswati, Retno. “The Function of Ideal Law in Preparation Regulation Legislation in Order to Creating Equitable Regional Development.” Diponegoro Law Review 2, no. 1 (April 2017): 114. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.2.1.2017.114-122
  40. Sebastian, Leonard C., Emirza Adi Syailendra, and Keoni Indrabayu Marzuki. “Civil-Military Relations in Indonesia after the Reform Period.” Asia Policy 13, no. 3 (2018): 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2018.0041
  41. Shapiro, Hal, and Lael Brainard. “Fast Track Trace Promotion Authority.” Policy Brief The Brookings Institution Washington, DC 91 (2001). https://www.brookings.edu/articles/fast-track-trade-promotion-authority/
  42. Sihombing, Eka N.A.M., and Ali Marwan Hsb. Paradigma Hukum Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Medan: Enam Media, 2020
  43. Siwu, Sonya Claudia, and Rofi Aulia Rahman. “The State of Emergency in Indonesia. A Great Lesson from the Covid-19 Pandemic.” INCLAR 3rd International Conference on Law Reform (Surabaya), INCLAR 3rd International Conference on Law Reform, 2022. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i15.12082
  44. Sudini, Luh Putu, and Made Wiryani. “Juridical Analysis of Local Government Authority on the Establishment Local Regulations Eco-Tourism Development.” Diponegoro Law Review 7, no. 1 (April 2022): 53–69. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.7.1.2022.53-69
  45. Susilowati, Wand Mei Herry. “Application of Fast-Track Legislation Method in Presidential System of Government in Indonesia.” Cepalo 8, no. 1 (June 2024): 49–68. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v8no1.3346
  46. Taylor, Duncan A. “The United Kingdom Is Leaving the European Union: Analyzing the Contractual and Legal Implication for a Member Leaving.” Southern Illinois University Law Journal 42 (2018): 347–66. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/siulj42&i=369
  47. Tehupeiory, Aartje. “Legal Protection to Individual Rights in Land Procurement for Public Interest.” Diponegoro Law Review 2, no. 1 (April 2017): 101. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.2.1.2017.101-113
  48. Trosow, Samuel E. “Fast-Track Trade Authority and the Free Trade Agreements: Implications for Copyright Law.” Canadian Journal of Law and Technology 2, no. 2 (2003): 135–49. https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cjlt/vol2/iss2/4/
  49. “V Political Process : Public Opinion, Attitudes, Parties, Forces, Groups and Elections / Vie Politique : Opinion Publique, Attitudes, Partis, Forces, Groupes et Élections.” International Political Science Abstracts 74, no. 2 (April 2024): 256–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208345241247504
  50. Weinhardt, Clara, and Deborah Barros Leal Farias. “Developing Countries in Global Trade Governance: Comparing Norms on Inequality in the WTO and GSP Schemes.” Review of International Political Economy, February 25, 2025, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2025.2455504
  51. Welser, Irene, and Christian Klausegger. “Fast Track Arbitration: Just Fast or Something Different?” https://www.cerhahempel.com/fileadmin/docs/publications/Welser/Beitrag_Welser_2009.pdf
  52. Widiati, Ekawestri Prajwalita. “Efficient Public Participation in The Local Law-Making Process.” Yuridika 33, no. 3 (October 2018): 389. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v33i3.8914
  53. Williams, Brock R. U.S. and Global Trade Agreements: Issues for Congress. 2018. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R45198.html
  54. Wright, Laura L. “Trade Promotion Authority: Fast Track for the Twenty-First Century.” William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 12, no. 3 (2004): 979–1006. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol12/iss3/18/
  55. Zuiderwijk, Anneke, Yu-Che Chen, and Fadi Salem. “Implications of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Public Governance: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda.” Government Information Quarterly 38, no. 3 (July 2021): 101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-02-20 15:10:24

No citation recorded.