Media, Ranah dan Dinamika Permainan

*Amirudin Amirudin  -  Program Studi Antropologi, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Indonesia
Published: 1 Dec 2017.
Open Access Copyright 2017 ENDOGAMI
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Full Text:
Statistics: 285 419
In the 21st century, the media is increasing rapidly and requires a specific response from anthropology studies. Not only does the media bring with implications for changes in the process of production and consumption of culture, but also changes to its viewpoint and approach. It's not enough if the media was studied only with a classical perspective that only positioned the media as a cultural communication agent, or otherwise the media is approached with the effects study. However, the media also needs to be recognized with a more progressive perspective that positions the media as an agency in cultural production practices. Based on the idea, this paper provides provocation through Amirudin's research (2016) which tried to present a new perspective in media studies
Media; Anti-esensialist Study; Field

Article Metrics:

  1. Amirudin. 2016. Tayangan Religi sebagai Ranah Produksi Budaya: Kajian terhadap Tayangan Mamah dan Aa Beraksi di Stasiun TV Indosiar. Disertasi. Jakarta: Unibersitas Indonesia.
  2. ________. 2011. Media dan Produksi Budaya. Sabda Jurnal Kajian Kebudayaan (ISSN 1410-7910). Semarang: FIB Undip. Vol 11, hal 18.
  3. Abu-Lughod, Ginsburg, and Larkin B. 2002. Media Worlds: Anthropology on New Terrain. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  4. Adorno, T.W. 1991.The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture, J. Bernstein (ed). London: Routledge.
  5. Alam, Bachtiar. 1998. ‘Globalisasi dan Perubahan Budaya: Perspektif Teori Kebudayaan’, dalam Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia 21 (54): 1-11.
  6. Ang, Ien. 1985. Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. London: Methuen.
  7. Ang, Ien. 1991. Desperately Seeking the Audience. London: Routledge.
  8. Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
  9. Askew, Kelly. 2002. ‘Introduction to Media Anthropolog’, dalam Kelly Askew & Ricahrd R Wilk (eds); The Anthropology of Media a Reader (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing). p.1–12.
  10. Bailey, F.G. 1969. Stratagems and Spoils. Oxford: Blackweel.
  11. Baudrillard, J. 1975. The Mirror of Production. Telos Press, St. Louis, MO.
  12. Baudrillard, J. 1981. For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. Telos Press, St. Louis, MO.
  13. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. The Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. R. Nice. Cambridge M.A.: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1992. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  15. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Eassys on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
  16. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996. On Television. New York: The New Press.
  17. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Practical on the Theory Reason of Action. California, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  18. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2005. Distinction: a Social Critique of a Judgement of Taste. trans. R. Nice. Cambridge, M.A.: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Brauchler, B., dan Postill, J. 2010. ‘Theorizing Media and Practice’, dalam Anthropology of Media Vol. 4. New York: Berghahn Books.
  20. Cantor, Muriel. 1972. The Hollywood TV Producer: His Work and His Audience. New York: Routledge.
  21. Durkheim, E., 1976. The Elemementary Forms of The Religious Life. Terjemahan J.E. Swam: . London: Allen-Unwin.
  22. Fiske, John and Hartley, John. 2003. Reading Television. London: Routledge.
  23. Fiske, John. 1987. Television Culture: Popular Pleasures and Politics. London: Routledge.
  24. Fisher, Michael M.J. 2007. ‘Culture and Cultural Analysis as Experimental Systems’, dalam Cultural Anthropology 22 (1): hal 1-65.
  25. Giddens, Anthony, 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  26. Gitlin,Todd. 1983. Inside Prime Time. New York: Pantheon.
  27. Hall, Stuart., et. al. (eds). 1980. Culture Media Language. London: Routledge.
  28. Jenkins, Richard. 1992. Key Sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge
  29. Kitley, Philip. 2000. Konstruksi Budaya Bangsa di Layar Kaca. Jakarta: PT Media Lintas Inti Nusantara
  30. Lukens-Bull, Ronald. 2008. “Commodification of Religion and The ‘Religification’ of Commodities: Youth Culture and Religious Identity”, dalam Pattana Kitiarsa (ed): Religious Commodifications in Asia: Marketing Gods (New York: Routledge). p.220-234
  31. Mayer, V., Banks. 2009.‘Introduction to Production Studies’, dalam Bank V Mayer, Miranda J., Caldwell, dan John T (Eds) Production Studies: Cultural Studies of Media Industries (New York: Routledge). p1-5
  32. Mazzarella, William. 2004. ‘Culture Globalization, Mediation’, dalam Annual Review of Anthropology. 33: 345-367.
  33. McQuail, Denis. 1983. Mass Communication Theory: an Introduction. London: Sage Publication.
  34. Newman, M.Z. dan Levine, E. 2011. Legitimating Television: Media Convergence and Cultural Status. New York: Routledge.
  35. Novenanto, Anton., 2009. Mediated Disaster: The Role of Alternatif and Mainstream Media in the East Java Mud Vulcano Disaster. MA Thesis in Department of Cultural Anthropology and Development Sociology. Leiden: University of Leiden.
  36. Ortner, Sherry B. (2009). ‘Studying Sideways: Ethnographic Access in Hollywood,’ dalam MayerV. Banks, M. CaldwellJ (Eds); Production Studies: Cultural Studies of Media Industries (New York: Routledge). p.78 – 92.
  37. Peterson, Mark, A., 2009. ‘Response to John Postill Social Anthropology/ Anthropologie Sociale’, dalam European Association of Social Anthropologists. Vol 17, (3) p334–344.
  38. Pink, Sarah, et al. 2004. Working Images: Visual Research and Representation in Ethnography. London And New York: Routledge
  39. Postill, J. 2013. ‘Fields as Dynamic Clusters of Practices, Games and Socialitie’, dalam Amit (ed); Sociality: An Anthropological Interrogation (Oxford and New York: Berghahn). Diakses melalui http:/wwww. Fields_as_dynamic_ clusters_of_practicgames and_socialities pada 25 April 2013.
  40. Rappaport, Roy A. 1999. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Sen, Krisna & David T. Hill. 2001. Media, Budaya Dan Politik di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Media Lintas Inti Nusantara
  41. Shoemaker, Pamela J. dan Stephen D Reese. 1991. Mediating the Message: Theories of Influence on Mass Media Content. London: Longman.
  42. Storey, John. (editor). 1994. Cultural Theory and Popular Culture A Reader. New York: Harvester Wheatseaf.
  43. Storey, John. 2001. Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: An Introduction. London: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  44. Storey, John. 2008. Cultural Studies dan Kajian Budaya: Pengantar Komprehensif Teori dan Metode. Terjemahan Layli Rahmawati (Yogyakarta: Jalasutra).
  45. Turner, Victor W. 1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure.New York: Cornell University Press.
  46. Turner, Victor W. 1974. Dramas, Fields and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
  47. Turner, Victor W. 1987. The Anthropology of Performance. Preface: Richard Sechechner. New York: PAJ Publications.
  48. Valdivia, Angharad., N. 2003. A Companion to Media Studies. Oxford: Blackwell.
  49. Van Loon, Joost. 2008. Media Technology: Critical Perspectives. Glasgow: Open University Press.
  50. Williams, Raymond. 2003 [1974]. Television: Technology and Cultural Forms. London: Routledge.
  51. Zafirau, Stephen. 2009. ‘Audience Knowledge and the Everyday Lives of Cultural Producers in Hollywood’, dalam Mayer, Vicki, Banks, Miranda J., Caldwell, John T (eds); Production Studies: Cultural Studies of Media Industries (New York: Routledge).p 302-324