DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/endogami.3.2.158-165

Simbol: Arti, Fungsi, dan Implikasi Metodologisnya

*Eko Punto Hendro  -  Program Studi Antropologi Sosial, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2020 Endogami: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Antropologi under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Sign consists signifier and signified, but other expert tell that relationship between signs and their object are iconic, indexial and symbolic. The relationship signifier and signified is convention and arbitrary, but it can also be denotative, connotative and myth. Culture can means a set symbol system, which is used by mansion or people for ruler their behavior, included adaptation and interaction with their physical and symbolic environment. Interpretation to know the symbolic meaning, it is focus of symbolic interpretivism paradigm and also hermeumeutic paradigm, wich both also focus to interpretation of human creation
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: symbol; myth; interpretivism; hermeuneutic

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Recent articles
Reformasi Birokrasi Wali Kota Yogyakarta 2001 – 2011: Telaah Semiotika Partisipasi Masyarakat Kampung Kauman pada Tradisi Sekaten di Keraton Yogyakarta Konservasi Budaya Seni Tradisi Desa Tlogopucang Kabupaten Temanggung More recent articles
Most cited articles
Choumiryou dan Harapan Hidup Orang Jepang Jurnalisme Multikultural: Gagasan Mengembangkan Cara Pendekatan Pengkajiannya Livelihood Transformations of the Orang Rimba as Tacit Resistance in the Context of Deforestation Kerajinan Batik dan Pewarnaan Alami Pemanfaatan Remitan Ekonomi dan Ketergantungan Migran Kembali Bekerja di Luar Negeri More cited articles
  1. Ahimsa-Putra. 2001. Strukturalisme Levi-Strauss : Mitos dan Karya Sastra. Yogyakarta: Galang Printika
  2. Christomy, T, & Yuwono, Untung (Peny). 2004. Semiotika Budaya. Depok: Puslit Kemasy & Budaya Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Univ. Indonesia. Memuat karangan Benny H. Hoed, Rahayu S, Hidayat, Yasraf Amir Piliang, T. Cristomy dll
  3. Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Culture.New York : Basic Books
  4. ____________, 1983. Local Knowlegde: Further Essay in Interpretive Anthropology, New York: Basic Books
  5. Gottschalk, Louis. 1975. Mengerti Sejarah: Pengantar Metode Sejarah. Jakarta : Yayasan Penerbit Universitas Indonesia. Seri terjemahan : Nugroho Notosusanto
  6. Handler, Richard & Linnekin, Jocelyn. 1984. “Tradition : Genuine or Spurious”, dalam Journal of American Folklore. vol. 97. No.385 by The American Folklore Society 0021-8715/84/3850273-1852.30/1, hal. 273-290
  7. Harsoyo.1988. Pengantar Antropologi. Bandung: Binacipta
  8. Hobsbawm, Eric & Terence Ranger. 1987. The Invention of Tradition. London-New York- Sidney : Cambridge University Press
  9. Koentjaraningrat. 1985. Pengantar Antropologi. Jakart: Aksara Baru
  10. Palmer, Richard E. 2003. Hermeneutika: Teori Baru Mengenai Interpretasi, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Seri terjemahan oleh : Musnur Hery & Damanhuri Mohamed
  11. Rapoport, Amos. 1969. Hous Form and Culture. London: Prentice-Hall International, Inc
  12. Saiffudin, Achmad Fedyani. 2005. Antropologi Kontemporer: Suatu Pengantar Kritis Mengenai Paradigma. Jakarta: Prenada Media

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-04-16 09:54:27

No citation recorded.