DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/geoplanning.4.1.9-18

A GIS BASED EVALUATION OF LAND USE CHANGES AND ECOLOGICAL CONNECTIVITY INDEX

*Poppy Indrayani  -  Kyushu University, Japan and Fajar University Makassar, Japan
Yasuhiro Mitani  -  Kyushu University, Japan
Ibrahim Djamaluddin  -  Hasanuddin University, Indonesia
Hiro Ikemi  -  Kyushu University, Japan

Citation Format:
Abstract
Recently, the Makassar region is a significant land use planning and management issue, and has many impacts on the ecological function and structure landscape. With the development and infrastructure initiatives mostly around the urban centers, the urbanization and sprawl would impact the environment and the natural resources. Therefore, environmental management and careful strategic spatial planning in landscape ecological network is crucial when aiming for sustainable development. In this paper, the impacts of land use changes from 1997 to 2012 on the landscape ecological connectivity in the Makassar region were evaluated using Geographic Information System (GIS). The resulted GIS analysis clearly showed that land use changes occurring in the Makassar region have caused profound changes in landscape pattern. The spatial model had a predictive capability allowing the quantitative assessment and comparison of the impacts resulting from different land use on the ecological connectivity index. The results had an effective performance in identifying the vital ecological areas and connectivity prior to development plan in areas.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: land use change; landscape pattern; ecological connectivity; GIS; urban planning
Funding: Yasuhiro Mitani, Kyushu University, Japan, Departement of Civil Engineering, Ibrahim Djamaluddin, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia, Departemen of Civil Engineering, Hiro Ikemi, Kyushu University, Japan, Departemen of Civil Engineering

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Statistics:
Share:
Most cited articles
MAPPING AND ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC CONGESTION ON MAJOR ROADS IN MINNA (CASE STUDY OF CHANCHAGA L.G.A) ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF HEIGHTS OBTAINED FROM TOTAL STATION AND LEVEL INSTRUMENT USING TOTAL LEAST SQUARES AND ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES METHODS Evaluation of MODIS-Derived LST Products with Air Temperature Measurements in Cyprus ASSESSMENT OF MANGROVE FOREST DEGRADATION THROUGH CANOPY FRACTIONAL COVER IN KARIMUNJAWA ISLAND, CENTRAL JAVA, INDONESIA REFLEKSI 5 TAHUN PASKA ERUPSI GUNUNG MERAPI 2010: MENAKSIR KERUGIAN EKOLOGIS DI KAWASAN TAMAN NASIONAL GUNUNG MERAPI More cited articles

  1. Adriaensen, F., et al. (2003). The application of “least-cost” modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(4), 233–247. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6">CrossRef]

  2. Bender, D. J., Contreras, T. A., & Fahrig, L. (1998). Habitat Loss and Population Decline: A Meta-Analysis of the Patch Size Effect. Ecology, 79(2), 517. [https://doi.org/10.2307/176950">CrossRef] 

  3. Benedict, M. A., et al. (2012). Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities. Island Press. [https://books.google.co.id/books?id=2xTJvYqzFNkC">GoogleBook]

  4. Breuste, J., et al. (2015). Special Issue on Green Infrastructure for Urban Sustainability. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 141(3), A2015001. [https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000291">CrossRef] 

  5. Broquet, T., et al. (2006). Genetic isolation by distance and landscape connectivity in the American marten (Martes americana). Landscape Ecology, 21(6), 877–889. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-5956-y">CrossRef]

  6. Crooks, K. R., & Sanjayan, M. (2006). Connectivity Conservation. Cambridge University Press. [https://books.google.co.id/books?id=FWFTKyv9VPgC">GoogleBook]

  7. Dupras, J., et al. (2016). The impacts of urban sprawl on ecological connectivity in the Montreal Metropolitan Region. Environmental Science & Policy, 58, 61–73. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.005">CrossRef]

  8. Fahrig, L. (2003). Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34(1), 487–515. [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419">CrossRef]

  9. Forman, R. T. T. (1995). Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge University Press. [https://books.google.co.id/books?id=sSRNU_5P5nwC">GoogleBook]

  10. Girvetz, E. H., et al. (2008). Integration of landscape fragmentation analysis into regional planning: A statewide multi-scale case study from California, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(3–4), 205–218. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.02.007">CrossRef]

  11. Graves, T. A., et al. (2007). Identification of functional corridors with movement characteristics of brown bears on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. Landscape Ecology, 22(5), 765–772. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9082-x">CrossRef]

  12. Indrayani, P., et al. (2016). Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Land Use Changes in the Makassar Region Using GIS. Int. Symp. On Earth Science and Technology, Fukuoka, 298–303.

  13. Levin, N., et al. (2007). Landscape continuity analysis: A new approach to conservation planning in Israel. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79(1), 53–64. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.04.001">CrossRef]

  14. Li, J., et al. (2013). Spatiotemporal pattern of urbanization in Shanghai, China between 1989 and 2005. Landscape Ecology, 28(8), 1545–1565. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9901-1">CrossRef]

  15. Mao, Q. Z., et al. (2012). Research advances in ecological assessment of urban greenspace. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(17), 5589–5600. [https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201112141912">CrossRef]

  16. Marulli, J., & Mallarach, J. M. (2005). A GIS methodology for assessing ecological connectivity: application to the Barcelona Metropolitan Area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71(2–4), 243–262. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.03.007">CrossRef]

  17. Mathey, J., et al. (2015). Brownfields as an Element of Green Infrastructure for Implementing Ecosystem Services into Urban Areas. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 141(3), A4015001. [https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000275">CrossRef]

  18. Parasati, H. (2013). Program Pembangunan Perkotaan Nasional. In Konferensi e-Indonesia Initiative forum IX/2013. Jakarta.

  19. Parcerisas, L., et al. (2012). Land use changes, landscape ecology and their socioeconomic driving forces in the Spanish Mediterranean coast (El Maresme County, 1850–2005). Environmental Science & Policy, 23, 120–132. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.002">CrossRef]

  20. Pino, J., & Marull, J. (2012). Ecological networks: Are they enough for connectivity conservation? A case study in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region (NE Spain). Land Use Policy, 29(3), 684–690. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.11.004">CrossRef]

  21. Richter, M., & Weiland, U. (2011). Applied Urban Ecology: A Global Framework. Wiley.

  22. Selman, P. (2006). Planning at the Landscape Scale. Taylor & Francis. [https://books.google.co.id/books?id=TMh-AgAAQBAJ">GoogleBook]

  23. Tscharntke, T., et al. (2012). Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation, 151(1), 53–59. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.068">CrossRef]

  24. Turner, M. G. (2005). Landscape Ecology: What Is the State of the Science? Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 36(1), 319–344. [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152614">CrossRef]

  25. Zhou, W., et al. (2014). Relationships between land cover and the surface urban heat island: seasonal variability and effects of spatial and thematic resolution of land cover data on predicting land surface temperatures. Landscape Ecology, 29(1), 153–167. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9950-5">CrossRef] 


Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.