skip to main content

Low-Cost RPAS Photogrammetric Protocol for Multitemporal Monitoring of an Urban High-Andean Wetland: Application to Santa María del Lago, Bogotá

*César Augusto Gutiérrez-Rodríguez orcid  -  Corporación Unificada Nacional de Educación Superior - CUN, Colombia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Urban wetlands require frequent high-resolution monitoring, yet costs and logistics hamper traditional approaches. This study designs and validates a low-cost photogrammetric protocol using remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) to quantify short-term water-surface dynamics in an urban wetland. Ten fortnightly campaigns were conducted at Santa María del Lago (Bogotá) between 1 May and 4 September 2025 using nadir imagery with 80/75% overlap and a GSD of 2.8–3.2 cm/px. Without ground control points, internal geometric precision was assessed through sub-pixel reprojection error (~0.82 px) and relative scale consistency. Water extent was delineated using HSV thresholding and vectorization with a conservative positional threshold. Over 126 days, water-surface area decreased from 5.60 to 5.20 ha (−0.40 ha; −7.1%), with a median shoreline retreat of 1.1 m and a significant monotonic trend (Mann–Kendall τ = −1.00, p < 0.001). Each campaign required 35–45 min of fieldwork and 2.0–3.5 h of processing, with direct costs of USD 25–40 per flight. The protocol produced reproducible multitemporal datasets with decimetric planimetric sensitivity while reducing time and direct costs relative to conventional monitoring. The protocol proved feasible for high-Andean urban wetlands and potentially transferable to similar environments following local adaptation and validation.
Keywords: Urban Wetland Monitoring; UAV Photogrammetry; Low-Cost Drone Protocol
Funding: Corporación Unificada de Educación Superior - CUN

Article Metrics:

  1. Alikhani, S., Nummi, P., & Ojala, A. (2021). Urban Wetlands: A Review on Ecological and Cultural Values. Water, 13(22), 3301. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13223301">[Crossref]

  2. Benz, U. C., Hofmann, P., Willhauck, G., Lingenfelder, I., & Heynen, M. (2004). Multi-Resolution, Object-Oriented Fuzzy Analysis of Remote Sensing Data for GIS-Ready Information. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 58(3–4), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2003.10.002">[Crossref]

  3. Cook, E. M., Kim, Y., Grimm, N. B., McPhearson, T., Anderson, P., Bulkeley, H., Collier, M. J., Diep, L., Morató, J., & Zhou, W. (2025). Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(29). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2315909122">[Crossref]

  4. Courouble, M., Davidson, N., Dinesen, L., Fennessy, S., Galewski, T., Guelmami, A., Kumar, R., McInnes, R., Perennou, C., Rebelo, L.-M., Robertson, H., Segura-Champagnon, L., Simpson, M., & Stroud, D. (2021). Global Wetland Outlook: Special edition 2021 (N. Dudley (ed.)). https://doi.org/10.69556/GWO-2021-eng">[Crossref]

  5. Cuellar, Y., & Perez, L. (2023). Multitemporal Modeling and Simulation of the Complex Dynamics in Urban Wetlands: The Case of Bogota, Colombia. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 9374. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36600-8">[Crossref]

  6. Cvijanović, D., Novković, M., Milošević, D., Stojković Piperac, M., Galambos, L., Čerba, D., Stamenković, O., Damnjanović, B., Mesaroš, M., Pavić, D., Simić, V., Trbojević, I., Anđelković, A., Drešković, N., Stammel, B., Cyffka, B., & Radulović, S. (2025). Conservation and Ecological Screening of Small Water Bodies in Temperate Riverine Wetlands Using UAV Photogrammetry (Middle Danube). Nature Conservation, 58, 61–82. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.58.116663">[Crossref]

  7. Davidson, N. C., & Finlayson, C. M. (2018). Extent, Regional Distribution and Changes in Area of Different Classes of Wetland. Marine and Freshwater Research, 69(10), 1525–1533. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF17377">[Crossref]

  8. Delle Grazie, F. M., & Gill, L. W. (2022). Review of the Ecosystem Services of Temperate Wetlands and Their Valuation Tools. Water, 14(9), 1345.https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091345">[Crossref]

  9. Dronova, I., Kislik, C., Dinh, Z., & Kelly, M. (2021). A Review of Unoccupied Aerial Vehicle Use in Wetland Applications: Emerging Opportunities in Approach, Technology, and Data. Drones, 5(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5020045">[Crossref]

  10. Elkhrachy, I. (2015). Flash Flood Hazard Mapping Using Satellite Images and GIS Tools: A case study of Najran City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 18(2), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.06.007">[Crossref]

  11. Gbagir, A.-M. G., Ek, K., & Colpaert, A. (2023). OpenDroneMap: Multi-Platform Performance Analysis. Geographies, 3(3), 446–458. https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies3030023">[Crossref]

  12. Graser, A., Sutton, T., & Bernasocchi, M. (2025). The QGIS Project: Spatial without Compromise. Patterns, 6(7), 101265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2025.101265">[Crossref]

  13. Hamed, K. H., & Rao, A. R. (1998). A Modified Mann-Kendall Trend Test for Autocorrelated Data. Journal of Hydrology, 204(1–4), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00125-X">[Crossref]

  14. Johnson, P. (2011). Topographies of Urbanization: Survey in and around Pompeiopolis. Pompeipolis I, Içinde, 195–245.

  15. Mathews, A. J., Singh, K. K., Cummings, A. R., & Rogers, S. R. (2023). Fundamental Practices for Drone Remote Sensing Research Across Disciplines. Drone Systems and Applications, 11, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1139/dsa-2023-0021">[Crossref]

  16. Musungu, K., Dube, T., Smit, J., & Shoko, M. (2024). Using UAV Multispectral Photography to Discriminate Plant Species in a Seep Wetland of the Fynbos Biome. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 32(2), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-023-09971-y">[Crossref]

  17. Observatorio Ambiental de Bogotá. (2023). Plan de Manejo Ambiental: Humedal Santa María del Lagohttps://oab.ambientebogota.gov.co/?p=15068&post_type=dlm_download">  

  18. Otsu, N. (1979). A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 9(1), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076">[Crossref]

  19. Patel, S., Chintanadilok, J., Hall-Scharf, B., Zhuang, Y., Strickland, J., & Singh, A. (2024). WebODM: An Open-Source Alternative to Commercial Image Stitching Software for Uncrewed Aerial Systems (AE593) (Issue AE593).

  20. Patino, J. E., & Estupinan-Suarez, L. M. (2016). Hotspots of Wetland Area Loss in Colombia. Wetlands, 36(5), 935–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-016-0806-z">[Crossref]

  21. QGIS Development Team. (2025). QGIS Geographic Information System. QGIS Association. https://qgis.org">  

  22. Ramsar Convention Secretariat. (2022). Global Wetland Outlook: Special Edition 2021 -- The Value of Wetlands and the Threats They Face. Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. 

  23. Salas López, R., Terrones Murga, R. E., Silva-López, J. O., Rojas-Briceño, N. B., Gómez Fernández, D., Oliva-Cruz, M., & Taddia, Y. (2022). Accuracy Assessment of Direct Georeferencing for Photogrammetric Applications Based on UAS-GNSS for High Andean Urban Environments. Drones, 6(12), 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6120388">[Crossref]

  24. Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente. (2010b). Resolución 7773 de 2010: Por la cual se ajusta y aprueba el Plan de Manejo Ambiental del Humedal Santa María del Lago y se adoptan otras determinacioneshttps://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=41090">  

  25. Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente. (2023). Resolución 2026 de 2023: Por la Cual se Adopta la Actualización del Plan de Manejo Ambiental de la RDH Santa María del Lagohttps://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=152521">  

  26. Toffanin, P. (2019). OpenDroneMap: The Missing Guide. A Practical Guide to Drone Mapping Using Free and Open-Source Software. MasseranoLabs LLC.

  27. Unidad Administrativa Especial de Aeronáutica Civil. (2023). Resolución 1983 de 2023: Por medio de la cual se incorpora la norma RAC 100 -- Operación de sistemas de aeronaves no tripuladas UAS a los Reglamentos Aeronáuticos de Colombia. https://www.suin-juriscol.gov.co/viewDocument.asp?id=30050174">  

  28. Van Alphen, R., Rains, K. C., Rodgers, M., Malservisi, R., & Dixon, T. H. (2024). UAV-Based Wetland Monitoring: Multispectral and Lidar Fusion with Random Forest Classification. Drones, 8(3), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8030113">[Crossref]

  29. Yue, S., Pilon, P., Phinney, B., & Cavadias, G. (2002). The Influence of Autocorrelation on the Ability to Detect Trend in Hydrological Series. Hydrological Processes, 16(9), 1807–1829. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1095">[Crossref]

  30. Zerrouk, M., Ait El Kadi, K., Sebari, I., & Fellahi, S. (2025). Machine and Deep Learning for Wetland Mapping and Bird-Habitat Monitoring: A Systematic Review of Remote-Sensing Applications (2015–April 2025). Remote Sensing, 17(21), 3605. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17213605">[Crossref]


Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-07-01 11:58:56

No citation recorded.