skip to main content

OPTIMIZATION OF A GOOD GOVERNANCE SYSTEM THROUGH SYNERGY AND COLLABORATION BETWEEN LEADERSHIP AND BUREAUCRACY IN INDONESIA

*Magda Faradiba Mauludia Agung  -  Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Berliana Mustika Rani  -  Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Erwing Wahyu Millensyah  -  Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Hendra Wijayanto  -  Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Sarah Meirina Sari  -  Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Rizky Nurhidayat Perdana  -  Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Good governance is a crucial foundation for sustainable development in Indonesia. Its implementation, however, faces various challenges, including weak coordination between leadership and bureaucracy. This article aims to examine the role of synergy and collaboration between visionary leadership and professional bureaucracy in achieving effective, transparent, and accountable governance. This research employs a qualitative approach based on literature studies and policy analysis, focusing on case studies of bureaucratic reform in several regions of Indonesia. The findings indicate that a harmonious relationship between leadership and bureaucracy can enhance public service effectiveness, accelerate policy implementation, and minimize corruption. Responsive leadership serves as the primary driver of change, while professional bureaucracy acts as an efficient policy executor. The challenges include resistance to change, political influence, and overlapping bureaucratic authorities. Addressing these challenges requires strategic measures such as strengthening leadership training, performance-based bureaucratic reforms, and the adoption of digital technology to enhance transparency and efficiency. Strong synergy and good governance can be optimized to meet societal needs and global challenges.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Good Governance, Leadership, Synergy, Collaboration, Bureaucracy, Indonesia
Funding: Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur

Article Metrics:

  1. Argyris, C. (1964) Integrating the Individual and the Organization. New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203788417
  2. Bovaird, T., Löffler, E. and Loeffler, E. (2003) Public management and governance. London: Routledge
  3. Denhardt, J. V and Denhardt, R. B. (2015) The new public service: Serving, not steering. Routledge
  4. Fahmi (2017) Pengantar Ilmu kepemimpinan, Divisi Buku Perguruan Tinggi. Depok: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada
  5. Fukuyama, F. (2014) Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
  6. Hardiansyah, F. (2019) ‘E-Keuangan: Menuju Good Governance’, Jurnal Sains Penelitian & Pengabdian, 1(2), pp. 17–24
  7. Hasibuan, M. S. . (2007) Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: PT. Bumi Aksa
  8. Jackson, B. and Parry, K. (2018) A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying leadership. SAGE Publications Ltd
  9. Kotter, J. P. (1996) ‘Leadership change’, Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, USA
  10. Lestari, R. A. (2019) ‘Reformasi Birokrasi Sebagai Pelayan Publik’, Dinamika Governance : Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 9(1). doi: 10.33005/jdg.v9i1.1421
  11. Mergel, I., Edelmann, N. and Haug, N. (2019) ‘Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews’, Government information quarterly, 36(4), p. 101385
  12. Nawawi, H. (1999) Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Bisnis yang kompetitif. Yogyakarta: UGM PRESS
  13. Northouse, P. G. (2019) Leadership. Theory and practice. Eight editions. Western Michigan University. California, United States of America …
  14. OECD (2019) ‘Policy Brief on Incubators and Accelerators that Support Inclusive Entrepreneurship’, OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Papers, No. 13, pp. 1–20. doi: 10.2767/092345
  15. Oliveros, V. and Schuster, C. (2018) ‘Merit, tenure, and bureaucratic behavior: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in the Dominican Republic’, Comparative Political Studies, 51(6), pp. 759–792
  16. Osborne, D. (1993) ‘Reinventing government’, Public productivity & management Review, pp. 349–356
  17. Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2017) Public management reform: A comparative analysis-into the age of austerity. Oxford university press
  18. Risnawan, W. (2017) ‘Fungsi Birokrasi dalam Efektivitas Pelayanan Publik’, Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 4(1), pp. 1–14. Available at: http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI
  19. Robbins, S. P. and Judge, A. T. A. (2019) ‘Organizational Behavior. 18th Editi. New York City, NY’. USA: Pearson
  20. Wirtz, B. W. and Birkmeyer, S. (2018) ‘Mobile Government Services: An Empirical Analysis of Mobile Government Attractiveness’, International Journal of Public Administration, 41(16), pp. 1385–1395. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2017.1390583
  21. Yukl, G. (2010) ‘Leadership in organizations, upper Saddler river’, New Jersey: Person

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-04-18 21:02:57

No citation recorded.