skip to main content

BUREAUCRATIC OVERLOAD PETUGAS PEMASYARAKATAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF STREET-LEVEL DAN EKONOMI POLITIK

*Fitriya Sito Siwi  -  politeknik pengayoman indonesia, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
This article discusses the phenomenon of bureaucratic overload in the Indonesian correctional system, focusing on the experiences of field officers at the Boyolali Class IIB Detention Center. Correctional officers at the implementation level often perform dual roles that exceed their normative functions under limited resource conditions. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach using thematic and interpretative analysis techniques, based on data from observations, in-depth interviews, internal institutional documents, and formal regulations. The findings reveal that bureaucratic overload is not merely a result of technical or managerial shortcomings but is also influenced by institutional design and political incentive structures that do not prioritize frontline bureaucracy. It is significantly influenced by institutional design that is not yet optimal in terms of the separation of functions between detention centers and prisons, disproportionate human resource ratios, and prison transfer mechanisms that are not yet systematic, all of which contribute to an increased workload for officers. This article recommends a comprehensive approach to system reform, starting from regulatory reform, service digitalization, strengthening the capacity of technical implementation units, to decentralizing authority based on real needs in order to reduce bureaucratic burdens and strengthen the role of correctional officers as the frontline of public service
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Bureaucratic Overload; Corrections; Street-level Bureaucracy; political economy; Detention Center

Article Metrics:

  1. Dasgupta, A., & Kapur, D. (2024). The political economy of bureaucratic overload: Evidence from rural development officials in India (Working Paper). University of California Shelly, D. R. (2010). Periodic, chaotic, and doubled earthquake recurrence intervals on the deep San Andreas fault. Science, 328(5984), 1385-1388
  2. Knill, C., Steinebach, Y., & Zink, D. (2024). How policy growth affects policy implementation: Bureaucratic overload and policy triage. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(2), 324–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2158208
  3. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation
  4. Peraturan Perundang-undangan:
  5. Republik Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan
  6. Website
  7. Ditjenpas. (2025). SDP Publik. Diambil dari https://sdppublik.ditjenpas.go.id/
  8. Pemasyarakatan, S. D. (2024). Laporan Kinerja Pemasyarakatan Tahun 2024. Diambil dari ditjenpas.go.id: https://www.ditjenpas.go.id/laporan-kinerja-pemasyarakatan-tahun-2024

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-11-03 12:12:33

No citation recorded.