skip to main content

FILSAFAT ILMU KARL R. POPPER DAN THOMAS S. KUHN SERTA IMPLIKASINYA DALAM PENGAJARAN ILMU

1Jurusan Sejarah Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

2Jl. Prof. H. Soedarto, SH Tembalang Semarang 50275, Indonesia

Published: 1 Dec 2015.

Citation Format:
Abstract
This article discusses about philosophy of science according to Karl R. Popper and Thomas S. Kuhn. There are similarities and differences between their views about how progress and what function of science.Apparently both Popper and Kuhn agree that science does not proceed by induction. However Kuhn disagrees with the view that science progresses by falsifiability through conjectures and refutations, but occurance by paradigm shift. Popper and Kuhn’s disagreement amounted to a distinction between two functions within the practice of science, one of criticism (Popper) and one of puzzle solving (Kuhn).Science education implies the teaching and learning of science interesting and fruitful in one hand, and teachers should be role models to students in the other hand
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: falsifiability; conjectures and refutations; paradigm shift; criticism; puzlle solving

Article Metrics:

Last update:

  1. Metode, Pendekatan Ilmiah, Model Pemikiran Dan Teori Revolusi Paradigma Thomas Samuel Kuhn

    Shelly Alvareza Zazkia. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan, 1 (3), 2021. doi: 10.51214/bip.v1i3.310

Last update: 2024-11-14 03:24:05

No citation recorded.