MULTICULTURALISM IN EDUCATION INSTITUTION: STUDY ON MULTICULTURALISM PRACTICE IN WIJAYA KUSUMA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LASEM – REMBANG

*Amirudin Amirudin -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Received: 20 Nov 2018; Published: 10 Jan 2019.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2019 HUMANIKA
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: research artikel
Language: EN
Full Text:
Statistics: 163 85
Abstract

RESEARCH - is conducted to examine how multiculturalism is carried out in the field of educational. This research is intended to create a learning model that is able to produce multicultural products in Elementary School. Through ethnographic methods, this study found that the  multiculturalism practice in SD Wijayakusuma had happened, it can be seen by the dynamic interaction between inclusive actors. Elementary school students are openly abled to interact others without distinguishing ethnicity, religion, race and class. They have relation just the way they are, self openess, all students can be friends with anyone and express themselves without fear of threats from any parties.

Good interaction have been seen among students then create mutual appreciation and respect each others. In addition, this research also found that the factor that support multiculturalism creation in research locations such as: foundation policies and school’s key person who develop schools without any limitation of religion, ethnicity, culture, mutual appreciation and respectfull.

Meanwhile, other supporting factors are: infrastructure facilities for extracurricular cross ethnic activities; school changing name, free uniforms on Friday, teacher who have a sense of tolerance toward student, non-discriminatory school rules, meetings or deliberation between school and parent, mix-cultural arts between Javanese and Chinese, celebrating religious holidays, helping each other in preparation for religious activities, as well as the people enthusiasm who were very enthusiastic about the school.

Based on the findings, the researcher suggested: schools must provide more inclusive service space without discriminating between students. Improving the student facilities needed, holding joint activity that entertain community to show mutual appreciation and respect people each other. Even though they are different, they can still communicate each other. That’s why people put great expectation and abled give full support to the institutional of SD Wijayakusuma.
Keywords
Multiculturalism, Field of Educational, Learning Model

Article Metrics:

  1. Al Qurtubi, Sumanto. 2003. Arus Cina-Islam-Jawa: Bongkar Sejarah atas Peranan Tionghoa dalam Penyebaran Agama Islam di Nusantara Abad XV & XVI. Jakarta: LP3S dan Yayasan Nabil
  2. Amirudin. 2018. Mengkongkritkan Multikulturalisme: Belajar dari Relasi Jawa – Cina di Lasem Rembang. Dalam “60 Tahun Antropologi Indonesia: Refleksi Kontribusi Antropologi untuk Indonesia.” Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Antropologi, Departemen Antropologi FISIP UI. Prosiding (ISBN-978-602-51002-1-5), p 419.
  3. Amirudin. 2018. Antropologi Media: Agama dan Produksi Budaya di Layar Kaca. Semarang: Undip Press (ISBN-978-979-097-488-3
  4. Amirudin. 2017. Film Tanda Tanya: Suatu Gagasan Merealisasikan Multikulturalisme. Nusa: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra. Semarang: e-ISSN 0216-535X Vol. 12, No. 4. http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index. php/nusa/article/ view.
  5. A.R. Tilaar, H. 2004. Multikulturalisme:Tantangan-tantangan Global Masa Depan dalam Transformasi Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Grasindo
  6. Ata Ujan, Andre, dkk. 2009. Multikulturalisme: Belajar Hidup Bersama dalam Perbedaan. Jakarta: PT INDEKS
  7. Atabik, Ahmad. 2016. Percampuran Budaya Jawa dan Cina: Harmoni dan Toleransin Bersama Masyarakat Lasem. Jurnal Kajian Kebudayaan Sabda. Semarang: ISSN 1410-7910 Vol. 1 Tahun 2016, p l 7-18.
  8. Basrowi. 2005. Pengantar sosiologi. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia
  9. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. The Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. R. Nice. Cambridge M.A.: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1992 . Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  11. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Eassys on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
  12. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Practical on the Theory Reason of Action. California, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  13. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2005. Distinction: a Social Critique of a Judgement of Taste. trans. R. Nice. Cambridge, M.A.: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2010. Arena Produksi Kultural: Sebuah Kajian Sosiologi Budaya. Terjemahan Yudi Santosa. Yogyakarta: KreasiWacana.
  15. Cholil, Suhadi. 2008. Diskriminasi Disekeliling Kita : Negara, Politik Diskriminasi dan Multikulturalisme. Interfidei : Jogjakarta
  16. Hall, Stuart. 1987. “Politic of Identity”, dalam terence Ranger, Yunas Samad danOssie Stuart (eds), Culture, Identity, danPolitics: Ethnic Minorituies in Britain. Aldershot, Avebury, p. 129-135
  17. Hoon, Chang-Yay. 2012. Identitas Tionghoa Pasca Suharto: Budaya, Politik, dan Media. Jakarta: Inspeal Ahimsakarya Press
  18. Mahfud, Choirul. 2009. Pendidikan Multikulturalisme. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar
  19. Naim, Ngainun. 2010. Pendidikan Multikultural : Konsep dan Aplikasi. Jogjakarta : AR-RUZZ MEDIA
  20. Parekh, Bhikhu. 2008. Rethinking Multiculturalism:Keberegaman Budaya dan Teori Politik. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
  21. Parekh, Bhikhu. 1997, “National Culture and Multiculturalism”, dalam Kenneth Thomson (ed.), Media and Cultural Regulation, London
  22. Salim, Agus. 2004. Indonesia Belajarlah : Membangun Pendidikan Indonesia, Pendidikan Multikultural. Semarang: Gerbang Madani Indonesia
  23. Saputra, Teguh. 2014. Tarian Multikultural Sang Naga. Jakarta: Lembaga Studi Kapasitas Nasional