skip to main content

Resistensi Perempuan Difabel dalam Hunchback Karya Ichikawa Saō: Perspektif Feminist Disability Studies

1Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia

2Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

Received: 20 Feb 2026; Revised: 19 Apr 2026; Accepted: 24 Apr 2026; Published: 9 May 2026.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 Yunita El Risman, Fithyani Anwar, A. Achmad Fudail under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This article examines forms of resistance enacted by a disabled woman protagonist in Ichikawa Saō’s novel Hunchback (2023). The novel portrays a female character with congenital myopathy who lives in close relation to medical technology and institutional care. Employing a qualitative interpretive approach through close reading, this study draws on Rosemarie Garland-Thomson’s feminist disability theory to analyze how the disabled body is represented and negotiated within structures of power.The findings reveal three major forms of resistance: (1) resistance against the desexualization of disabled bodies through the assertion of sexual desire and embodied experience; (2) resistance against the stigma of unproductivity through narrative production and authorship; and (3) resistance against the politics of staring through the strategic use of digital technology as a medium of subject formation.The study argues that disability in the novel is not merely portrayed as a biological condition, but as a socially constructed category that can be contested through narrative articulation. This research contributes to contemporary Japanese literary studies by centering disability as a primary analytical lens and by expanding discussions of women’s resistance within frameworks of ableism and normate femininity.

Keywords: disabled women; narrative resistance; ableism; feminist disability studies; Japanese literature

Article Metrics:

  1. Allison, A. (2006). Millennial monsters: Japanese toys and the global imagination. University of California Press
  2. Allison, A. (2013). Precarious Japan. Duke University Press
  3. Belsey, C. (2002). Critical practice (2nd ed.). Routledge
  4. Bilal Ahmed, & Dr. Muhammad Ali Khan. (2025). Amidst Desire and Disability: A Posthumanist Study of Hunchback by Saou Ichikawa. Social Science Review Archives, 3(2), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i2.615
  5. Cary Wolfe. (2010). What is posthumanism? . University of Minnesota Press
  6. Copeland, R. L. (2010). The modern Murasaki: Writing by women of Meiji Japan. Columbia University Press
  7. Creswell, J. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications
  8. Dalton, E. (2017). Womenomics, ‘Equality’ and Abe’s Neo-liberal Strategy to Make Japanese Women Shine. Social Science Japan Journal, 20(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/ssjj/jyw043
  9. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, Volume 1: An introduction. Pantheon Books
  10. Garland-Thomson, R. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. Columbia University Press
  11. Garland-Thomson, R. (2011). Misfits: A Feminist Materialist Disability Concept. Hypatia, 26(3), 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01206.x
  12. Haraway, D. J. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). Routledge
  13. Ichikawa, S. (2023). ハンチバック[Hanchibakku]. 文藝春秋 (Bungeishunjū)
  14. Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press
  15. Kingston, J. (2019). Japan (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell
  16. Lamarre, T. (2009). The anime machine: A media theory of animation. University of Minnesota Press
  17. Mitchell, K. (2020). Shame, vulnerability, and change: Women’s writing and the politics of affect. Edinburgh University Press
  18. Orbaugh, S. (2017). Gender, genre, and the fantastic in modern Japanese literature. In R. L. Copeland (Ed.), The Columbia companion to modern Japanese literature (pp. 295–310). Columbia University Press
  19. Russell, M. (2019). Capitalism and disability. In K. R. Soldatic (Ed.), Disability and neoliberal state formations (pp. 45–60). Routledge
  20. Stienstra, D. (2023). (Th)reading Rights and Justice: Women and Girls with Disabilities. Global Society, 37(3), 354–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2022.2146576

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-05-22 12:40:01

No citation recorded.