The Nutrient Digestibility of Locally Sheep Fed with Amofer Palm Oil Byproduct-Based Complete Feed

Hamdi Mayulu


DOI: https://doi.org/10.12777/ijse.7.2.106-112

Abstract


Utilization of palm oil by-product such as palm fronds, leaves, empty fruit bunches (EFB), fiber fruit juice (FFJ), palm kernel cake (PKC), and palm oil sludge (POS) as the source of energy and protein for ruminants, especially sheep is an efficient effort to make a new opportunities in term of economical and beneficial product that will reduce environmental pollution. The objectives of this research were to analyze the effect of palm oil’s byproduct-based complete feed on sheep’s nutrient digestibility. Sixteen male sheeps of nine month old with average body weight 14.69+0.82 kg were used. The complete feed was formulated by ammoniated-fermented technology from palm fronds and leaves, EFB and FFJ, also Centrosema sp., PKC, POS, ground corn, rice bran, cassava, molasses, urea, mineral mix and salt. The complete feed with different levels of crude protein (CP) and TDN were used in this research which consisted of T1=10,63% CP; 63.46% TDN; T2=12.27% CP; 62.38% TDN; T3=13.70% CP; 64.11% TDN; and T4=15.90% CP; 61.28% TDN. The study used a completely randomized design (CRD) which consisted of four treatments and four replications. Data was analyzed using ANOVA with significance level at 95% and followed by Duncan Multiple Range Test. The experimental results showed that the protein level affected the feed digestibility. The highest digestibility of dry matter, organic matter and crude protein were 65.79%, 70.30%, and 84.34% respectively, resulting in 14% protein level (T3) were significantly different with treatment at protein level 10% (T1), 12% (T2) and 16% (T4) at p <0.05. It can be concluded that by-product of palm oil plantation and mill had good nutritional value. Therefore, this feedstuff can be used to formulate complete feed for sheep and it successfully increased the nutrient digestibility

Keywords


Complete feed; sheep; digestibility; palm plantation; palm oil by-product

Full Text:

FULL TEXT PDF

References


Akbar, S. A. 2007. Utilization of fermented palm bunches trash combined with defaunation and rumen by pass protein on sheep performance. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture 32 (2): 80–85.

Andayani, J. 2010. Evaluation of dry matter, organic matter and crudeprotein in vitro digestibilities of ammoniated corn husk in cattle ration. Journal of Livestock Sciences XIII (5): 252–259.

Anggorodi, R. 1994. General Cattle Feed. PT. Gramedia Jakarta.

Arifin, M., A. M. Hasibuan, C. M. S. Lestari, E. Purbowati, C. I. Sutrisno, E. Baliarti, S. P. S. Budhi and W. Lestariana. 2009. Edible carcass production of thin tail lambs fed complete feed composed of various agricultural by-products. Jurnal Pengembangan Peternakan 34 (2): 96–100.

Azmi and Gunawan. 2005. Potency of forage plantation area for thedevelopment of beef cattle in Bengkulu. In: Subandriyo, K. Diwyanto, I. Inounu, B. R. Prawiradiputra, B. Drtiadi, Nurhayati and A. Priyanti. Proceeding of the National Workshop on Animal Forage. Bogor 16 September 2005. pp. 64–67.

Batubara, L. P. 2003. Potential of animal production integrated withpalm oil estate as an agribusiness based ruminant. Wartazoa13 (3): 83–91.

Caneque, V., S. Valasco and J. L. Sanca. 2000. Nutrional value use of ligno-cellulosic feed treated with urea in the ruminant diet. Options MediterraneennesSerieSeminaires 16 (1991): 17–31.

Church, D. C and W. G. Pond. 2005. Basic Nutrition and Feeding 5th Ed. CABI Publishing. New York.

Coleman, S. W and J. E. Moore. 2003. Feed quality and animal performance. Field Crops Research 84: 17–29.

Despal, D.A. Astuti, D. M. Suci, D. Evvyernie, I. G. Permata, N. A. Sigitel al. 2007. Introduction: Nutrient Science. Department of Nutrient Science and Feed Technology.Faculty of Animal Science. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

Gaspersz, V. 1994.Experimental Setup Method. 2nd edition. CV.Armico. Bandung

Ginting, S. P. 2006. Integrated system development of lamb breeding and palm oil plantation (A study on feed availability and nutrient needs).Wartazoa 16: 53–64.

Gomez, K. A. and A. A. Gomez. 2007. Statistical Procedure forAgriculture Research. 2nd edition.UI-Press. Jakarta. (Translated by E. Syamsudin and J. S. Baharsyah).

Guntoro, S. 2008. Producing feed from plantation by-products. Penerbit PT. Agromedia Pustaka. Jakarta.

Guntoro, S. 2005. Processing plantation waste for livestock feed source. Warta Prima Tani1 (1): 8–11.

Haddad, S. G., K. Z. Mahmoud and H. A. Talfaha. 2005. Effect of varying levels of dietary undegradable protein on nutrient intake, digestibility and growth performance of Awassi lambs fed on high wheat straw diets. Small Ruminant Research 58: 231–236.

Hanafi, N. D. 2004. Silage and ammoniation treatment of palmleaves as feed source for sheep. Program study of livestock production, Faculty of Agriculture, Sumatera Utara University, Digitized by USU digital library.

Hardianto, R. 2003. Complete feed formulation technology. In: G.Kartono, Suhardjo, E. Widajati and D Ernawanto (ed). Technical Guide for the Development of Agricultural Technology. Office of Agriculture Technology Application of East Java. p. 109–117.

Kusnadi, U. 2008. Innovation on livestock technology in plant livestock integration system to support meat self-sufficiency. Development of Agricultural Innovation1 (3): 189–205.

Kuswandi. 2011. Local feed utilization technology to improve ruminant production. Pengembangan InovasiPertanian 4 (3): 189–204.

Mahaputra, S., P. Kurniadhi, Rokhman and Kadiran. 2003. Financial analysis of goat production using complete feed. Buletin TeknikPertanian 8 (2): 47–48.

Mahgoub, O., I. T. Kadim, M. H. Al-Busaidi, K. Annamalai and N. M. Al-saqri. 2007. Effects of fiding ensiled date palm fronds and a by-product concentrate on performance and meat quality of Omani sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 135: 210–221.

Maryono and N. H. Krishna. 2009. The advantage and limitation of agriculture byproduct and feeding strategy based on agriculture by-product for beef cattle. Wartazoa 19 (1): 31–42.

Mayulu, H., B. Suryanto, Sunarso, M. Christiyanto, F. I. Ballo and Refa’i. 2009. Feasibility of complete feed based on ammoniated fermented rice straw utilization on the beef cattle farming. J. Indon. Trop. Anim.Agric 34 (1): 74–79.

Mayulu, H. 2013. The nutrient potency of palm oil plantation and mill’s by-product processed with amofer technology as ruminant feed. Internat. J. Sci and Eng. 6 (2): 112-116.

Mayulu, H. 2012. Optimization of palm oil plantation agro ecosystem based ruminant feed resource through complete feed technology. Dissertation Summary, Graduate Program Diponegoro University, Agency Publisher Diponegoro University in Semarang, Semarang.

Mayulu, H., Sunarso, C. Sitrisno and Sumarsono. 2012. The effects of amofer palm oil waste-based complete feed to blood profiles and liver function on local sheep. Internat. J. Sci and Eng. 3 (1): 17-21.

Mayulu, H. 2008. The effects of the use of fermented-ammoniated rice straw-based complete feed on the production and feasibility of beef cattle farming. Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang (Tesis Magister).

Mathius, I. W. 2008. Development of beef cattle based palm oil industry. Development of Agricultural Innovation1 (3): 206–224.

Mathius, I. W., D. Sitompul, B. P. Manurung and Azmi. 2004. Byproductof palm oil plantation and mill as complete feed source for cattle: a review. Proceeding of National Workshop.Department ofAgriculture.

Mathius, I. W dan A. P. Sinurat. 2001. Utilization of inconventional feedstuffs for animal production. Wartazoa 11 (2): 20–31.

Nurhaita, N. Jamarun, L. Warly and M. Zein. 2010. Digestibility of sheep ration with ammoniated palm leaves supplemented with sulfur, phosphor and cassava leaves. Media Peternakan: 144–149.

Orskov, E. R. 1982. Protein Nutrition in Ruminant.Academic Press London.

Parakkasi, A. 1999. Nutrition Scinces and Ruminant Feed. PenerbitUniversitas Indonesia (University Press), Jakarta.

Pittroff, W, D. H. Keisler and H. D. Blackburn. 2006. Effects of a high-protein, low-energy diet in finishing lambs: 2. Weight change, organ mass, body composition, carcass traits, fatty acid composition of lean and adipose tissue, and taste panel evaluation. Livestock Science 101: 278–293.

Ribeiro, J. M. C. R. 2000. Treatment of straws. Options Mediterraneennes Serie Seminaires 16 (1991): 55–60.

Rubianti, A., P. Th. Fernandez., H. H. Marawali and E. Budisantoso. 2007. Dry matter and organic matter digestibility of hay clitoriaternatea and centrocema pascourum cv cavalcade of weaned male Bali cattle. page.:1-8. [Sitasi 10 September 2009]. Available at: http://ntt.litbang.deptan. go.id/karya-ilmiah/7.pdf

Satter, L. D. and L. L. Slyter. 1974. Effect of Amonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. Br. J. Nutr. 32: 199.

Satter, L. D. and R. E. Roffler. 1981. Influence of nitrogen and carbohidrate inputs on rumen fermentation. (W. Haresign and D. J. A. Cole, Eds.).Recent Developments in Ruminant Nutrition.1 st. Publ. Butterworths London.

Silva, A.M. A., A.G. Silva Sobrinho, I. A. C. M. Trindade, K. T. Resende and O. A. Bakke. 2007. Net and metabolizable protein requirements for body weight gain in hair and wool lambs. Small Ruminant Research 67: 192–198.

Supranto, J. 2006. Operation Research. UI Press, Jakarta.

Sutama, I. K and I. G. M. Budiarsana. 2009. Complete Guide of Goat and Sheep. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.

Sutardi, T. 2001. Revitalization of dairy cattle through utilization ofration based estate by-product and organic mineral supplement. Research of RUT VIII.1.Ministry of Research and Technology together with Indonesian Institute of Science, Bogor.

Sutardi, T., N. A. Sigit and T. Toharmat. 1983. Quality Standard of Protein Contained in Ruminant Feedstuff based on the Metabolic Parameter by Rumen Microbe. Project of Science and Technology Development. Directorate of Community Building and Empowerment. Directorate General of Higher Education.

Sutrisno, C. I. 2001. Integration of technology engineering and it simplementation. Journal of Topical Livestock Development. Special Edition: KS 1–9.

Tillman, A. D., H. Hartadi, S. Reksohadiprodjo, S. Prawirokusumo and S. Lebdosoekojo. 1998. The Principal of Livestock Feed Science. 5th edition, GadjahMada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Tulloh, N. M. 1978. Growth, Development, Body Composition, Breeding and Management.In: W. A. T. Bowker, R. G. Dumsdey, J. E. Frisch, R. A. Swan and N. M. Tulloh ed., Beef cattle Management and Economics. AAUCS. Academy Press Pty Ltd, Brisbane.

Umiyasih, U and Y. N Anggraeni. 2003. Integrated system of animal and plantation: review of the forage availability for beef cattle in palm oil plantation area. pp. 156–166. [Cited June 2nd 2012]. Available in: http:// peternakan.litbang.deptan.go.id/fullteks/lokakarya/probklu03-16.pdf

Utomo, B. N and E. Widjaja. 2004. Processing of palm oil solid waste asnutrient content for ruminant feed source. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian 23 (1): 22-28.

Wahyono, D. E and R. Hardianto. 2004. Utilization of local feed resources to develop beef cattle (Paper was presented at National Seminar of Beef Cattle 2004). Livestock Research Center and Development, Bogor.

Wina, E. 2005.Technology on utilizing microorganism in feed toincrease ruminant productivity in Indonesia: a review. Wartazoa 15 (4): 173–186.

Zain, M. 2007. Optimization of palm oil fiber as alternative feed source supplemented with cassava leave for ruminant ration. Jurnal Pengembangan PeternakanTropis 32 (2): 100–105.




Published by Department of Chemical Engineering University of Diponegoro Semarang
Google Scholar
IJSE  by http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/ijse is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.