skip to main content

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), accredited SINTA 3 by Kemenristek Dikti, is published by Department of Business Administration, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia. This publication contains various scientific writings in the form of research result, theoretical and conceptual studies, practical applications from academics and business practitioners. We welcome novel, innovative, and ground-breaking contributions, the focus of authors’ work must be on addressing the Business Administration issues.

  • The following are suggested areas of interest:Accounting
  • Corporate Governance
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Finance
  • Human resources
  • Knowledge Management
  • Leadership
  • Management information system
  • Marketing
  • Operation Management
  • Strategic Management
  • Taxation
  • Other topics in the field of business administration

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions
Checked Indexed
Checked Peer Reviewed

Editorial

Checked Open Submissions
Unchecked Indexed
Unchecked Peer Reviewed

 

Peer Review Process / Policy

Quality peer review plays an essential role in the decisions to accept and publish an article in Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis. All articles reviewed by double-blinded peer-review by carefully selecting dedicated and knowledgeable individuals who are experts in their field.

Manuscripts submitted to the Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis will be evaluated through the Editorial and Peer-Review stages.
At the Editorial Review stage, the manuscript will be evaluated for its suitability with the focus and scope of the journal and the author's guidelines. Google Scholar is used for plagiarism check at this stage. The duration of the evaluation is 1-4 weeks.
Manuscripts that pass the Editorial Review stage will enter the Peer-Review stage where the substance of the manuscripts will be reviewed double blindly by at least two reviewers. The duration of the evaluation was 2-12 weeks after the review assignment. Reviewers can request a resubmit for review after the author has revised the article. The editor will send reviewer comments to the author to take the necessary action and revise.
Based on the reviewers recommendations, the Editor decides whether the revised manuscript can be published or not. All pre-published articles must be free of plagiarism content. Editors use Turnitin to check articles for similarity to other articles.
If you are interested in becoming a reviewer or editorial board of the JAB, please complete the online Application Form.

 

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis P-ISSN: 2252-3294 E-ISSN: 2548-4923 is scheduled for publication in March and September (2 issues a year).  It is electronically published via journal website (https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/janis).

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Full text articles can be downloaded freely and are available on the JAB website.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration.

 

Publication Ethics

Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (P-ISSN 2252-3294, E-ISSN: 2548-4923) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Department of Business Administration, Diponegoro University. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis is published twice a year in March and September. This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JAB is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.

Journal editor takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and
necessary.

Publication decisions

The JAB editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

 

Indexing

Articles published in the Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB, P-ISSN: 2252-3294 E-ISSN: 2548-4923) are indexed in the following indexes:

https://sinta.ristekbrin.go.id/assets/img/sinta_logo.png

Hasil gambar untuk google scholar logo

Hasil gambar untuk dimensions logo

 

JTERA (Jurnal Teknologi Rekayasa)

1 Friedrich Summann

 

Accreditation

JAB is accredited by SINTA 3 according to the Decree of the Director General for Strengthening Research and Development of the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education Number: 23 / E / KPT / 2019, dated 8 August 2019

 

CrossMark Applying on JAB

Crossmark

Applying the CrossMark icon is a commitment by Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis to maintain the content published and alert readers to changes if and when they occur.

What is Crossmark?

CrossMark, a multi-publisher initiative from CrossRef, provides a standard way for readers to locate the authoritative version of a document. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis recognizes the importance of the integrity and completeness of the scholarly record to researchers and librarians and attaches the highest importance to maintaining trust in the authority of its electronic archive. Clicking on the CrossMark icon will inform the reader of the current status of a document and may also provide additional publication record information about the document.

 

Content License

Creative Commons License Creative Common Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
  • for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.