1Faculty of Food Technology, Saigon Technology University (STU), Ho Chi Minh City,, Viet Nam
2Faculty of Food Technology, Saigon Technology University (STU), Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JGI65942, author = {Dat Trinh Tac Ngo and Ngoc Hieu Tran and Kim Anh Hoang}, title = {Study of microwave-assisted extraction of polyphenol from Phyllanthus urinaria}, journal = {Jurnal Gizi Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Nutrition)}, volume = {13}, number = {1}, year = {2024}, keywords = {Antioxidant capacity; kinetic model; microwave-assisted extractio; phyllanthus urinaria; polyphenol}, abstract = { ABSTRACT Background: Phyllanthus urinaria, found extensively in tropical Asian countries, possesses numerous biological activities attributed to its polyphenol compounds. Objective : This study aims to optimize polyphenol extraction from Phyllanthus urinaria using microwave assistance. Materials and Methods : First, the effects of parameters including ethanol concentration (used as the solvent) (40–80% v/v), material-to-solvent ratio (1:10–1:50 w/v), extraction time (30–150 minutes), and extraction temperature (30–70°C) on conventional extraction were investigated. Subsequently, the effects of microwave pretreatment prior to extraction during the microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) process, including microwave power (100–700 W) and irradiation time (1–9 minutes), were evaluated. Optimal extraction conditions were determined based on total flavonoid content (TFC), total phenolic content (TPC), and antioxidant activity (DPPH scavenging assay) of the extract. The second-order kinetic model was also used to compare the efficiency of extraction methods. Results : Results indicated that a microwave power of 250 W and irradiation time of 3 minutes were optimal for material pretreatment prior to extraction. Subsequent extraction parameters included ethanol concentration of 60% (v/v), solvent-to-material ratio of 1:40 (w/v), extraction temperature of 50°C, and extraction time of 60 minutes. Under these conditions, the extract exhibited maximum levels of TPC (277.99 ± 5.47 mgGAE/gDW), TFC (38.90 ± 0.58 gQE/gDW), and TEAC (280.08 ± 0.75 µmolTE/gDW), which were 22.5%, 36.1%, and 29.4% higher, respectively, compared to the control without microwave treatment. Conclusion : Furthermore, the second-order kinetic model demonstrated higher initial extraction rate (h), extraction rate constant (k), and extraction capacity (C e ) for MAE compared to conventional extraction. Keywords : Antioxidant capacity; kinetic model; microwave-assisted extractio; phyllanthus urinaria; polyphenol }, issn = {2338-3119}, pages = {88--98} doi = {10.14710/jgi.13.1.88-98}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/jgi/article/view/65942} }
Refworks Citation Data :
ABSTRACT
Background: Phyllanthus urinaria, found extensively in tropical Asian countries, possesses numerous biological activities attributed to its polyphenol compounds.
Objective: This study aims to optimize polyphenol extraction from Phyllanthus urinaria using microwave assistance.
Materials and Methods: First, the effects of parameters including ethanol concentration (used as the solvent) (40–80% v/v), material-to-solvent ratio (1:10–1:50 w/v), extraction time (30–150 minutes), and extraction temperature (30–70°C) on conventional extraction were investigated. Subsequently, the effects of microwave pretreatment prior to extraction during the microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) process, including microwave power (100–700 W) and irradiation time (1–9 minutes), were evaluated. Optimal extraction conditions were determined based on total flavonoid content (TFC), total phenolic content (TPC), and antioxidant activity (DPPH scavenging assay) of the extract. The second-order kinetic model was also used to compare the efficiency of extraction methods.
Results: Results indicated that a microwave power of 250 W and irradiation time of 3 minutes were optimal for material pretreatment prior to extraction. Subsequent extraction parameters included ethanol concentration of 60% (v/v), solvent-to-material ratio of 1:40 (w/v), extraction temperature of 50°C, and extraction time of 60 minutes. Under these conditions, the extract exhibited maximum levels of TPC (277.99 ± 5.47 mgGAE/gDW), TFC (38.90 ± 0.58 gQE/gDW), and TEAC (280.08 ± 0.75 µmolTE/gDW), which were 22.5%, 36.1%, and 29.4% higher, respectively, compared to the control without microwave treatment.
Conclusion: Furthermore, the second-order kinetic model demonstrated higher initial extraction rate (h), extraction rate constant (k), and extraction capacity (Ce) for MAE compared to conventional extraction.
Keywords: Antioxidant capacity; kinetic model; microwave-assisted extractio; phyllanthus urinaria; polyphenol
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2025-01-06 19:10:01
Jurnal Gizi Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Nutrition) is published under licensed of a CC BY-SA Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International LicenseThe Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Gizi Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Nutrition) and Department of Nutrition Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro as publisher of the journal.
Copyright encompasses exclusive rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations. The reproduction of any part of this journal, its storage in databases and its transmission by any form or media, such as electronic, electrostatic and mechanical copies, photocopies, recordings, magnetic media, etc., will be allowed only with a written permission from Jurnal Gizi Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Nutrition).
Jurnal Gizi Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Nutrition), Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, the Editors and the Advisory Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the Indonesian Journal of Nutrition are sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
View JGI Stats