skip to main content

The Impact of Perceived Value on Engagement, Purchase Intention, and Continuance Usage Intention: A PLS-SEM Study on Social Commerce Live Streaming Context

Muhammad Fajar Ramadhoni  -  Department of Information System, Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia, Kompleks PT. Semen Indonesia (Persero) Tbk, Jl. Veteran, Kb. Dalem, Sidomoro, Kebomas, Indonesia 61122| Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia, Indonesia
*Grandys Frieska Prassida orcid scopus publons  -  Department of Information System, Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia, Kompleks PT. Semen Indonesia (Persero) Tbk, Jl. Veteran, Kb. Dalem, Sidomoro, Kebomas, Indonesia 61122| Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study aims to analyse the factors influencing customer engagement in social commerce live streaming, specifically on the TikTok Shop platform, and their impact on purchase intentions and continuance usage intention. The significance of this research lies in the rapid development of social media applications within the social commerce sector, which presents new opportunities for brands to interact directly with users through live streaming features. A quantitative research approach was employed, utilizing survey techniques to collect data from respondents who are active users of the TikTok Shop platform in Indonesia and engage with its live streaming feature. The data were analysed using the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) method. The results indicate that the hedonic, symbolic, and interactivity values of live streaming positively influence customer engagement, whereas utilitarian values have no significant effect. Moreover, customer engagement positively affects purchase intentions and continuance usage intentions. These findings underscore the critical role of emotional and interactive aspects of live streaming in fostering customer engagement, which subsequently enhances purchase intentions and sustained usage. This research offers valuable insights into the development of digital marketing and user interaction strategies in the context of social commerce.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Live Streaming; TikTok Shop; Customer Engagement; Purchase Intention; Continuance Usage Intention; Social Commerce

Article Metrics:

  1. Ariel, Y., & Avidar, R. (2015). Information, Interactivity, and Social Media. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.972404
  2. Cao, H., Chen, Z., Cheng, M., Zhao, S., Wang, T., & Li, Y. (2021). You Recommend, i Buy: How and Why People Engage in Instant Messaging Based Social Commerce. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3449141
  3. Chen, Y.-R. R. (2017). Perceived values of branded mobile media, consumer engagement, business-consumer relationship quality and purchase intention: A study of WeChat in China. Public Relations Review, 43(5), 945–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.07.005
  4. Chong, H. X., Hashim, A. H., Osman, S., Lau, J. L., & Aw, E. C. X. (2023). The future of e-commerce? Understanding livestreaming commerce continuance usage. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 51(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-01-2022-0007
  5. DataReportal. (2023). Digital 2023 Indonesia: Essential Insights into the Use of the Internet, Mobile, Social Media, and E-commerce in Indonesia. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-indonesia
  6. Elvi Susanti, & Suhroji Adha. (2023). The Effect of Tik Tok Live Streaming in Increasing Consumer Trust and Purchasing Decisions. Formosa Journal of Applied Sciences, 2(12), 3293–3306. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjas.v2i12.7214
  7. Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W. W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8
  8. Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  9. Evelina, T. Y., Kusumawati, A., Nimran, U., & Sunarti. (2020). THE INFLUENCE OF UTILITARIAN VALUE, HEDONIC VALUE, SOCIAL VALUE, AND PERCEIVED RISK ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: SURVEY OF E-COMMERCE CUSTOMERS IN INDONESIA. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(2), 613–622. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.12143
  10. F. Hair Jr, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  11. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  12. Fowler, F., & Cosenza, C. (2009). Design and Evaluation of Survey Questions. In The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods (pp. 375–412). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n12
  13. Gan, C., & Wang, W. (2017). The influence of perceived value on purchase intention in social commerce context. Internet Research, 27(4), 772–785. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-06-2016-0164
  14. Gao, J. (2024). R-Squared (R 2 ) – How much variation is explained? Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences, 5(4), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843231186398
  15. Google. (2024). Google Forms. https://www.google.com/forms/about/
  16. Haimson, O. L., & Tang, J. C. (2017). What Makes Live Events Engaging on Facebook Live, Periscope, and Snapchat. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025642
  17. Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
  18. Hair, J. F., Hult M., G. T., Ringle, C. M., &, & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, 390
  19. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  20. Hu, M., Zhang, M., & Wang, Y. (2017). Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 594–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.006
  21. Joo, E., & Yang, J. (2023). How perceived interactivity affects consumers’ shopping intentions in live stream commerce: roles of immersion, user gratification and product involvement. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 17(5), 754–772. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-02-2022-0037
  22. Liang, T.-P., Ho, Y.-T., Li, Y.-W., & Turban, E. (2011). What Drives Social Commerce: The Role of Social Support and Relationship Quality. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415160204
  23. MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.08.001
  24. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. The MIT Press
  25. Oktaviani, R., Murwani, F. D., & Hermawan, A. (2024). The Effect of Live Streaming Quality on Purchase Intention through Immersive Experience, Consumer Trust, and Perceived Value (Study of This is April Consumers on TikTok). International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 5(1), 765–789. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v5i1.490
  26. Panjaitan, H. Y., Masnita, Y., & Kurniawati, K. (2023). Penambahan Variabel Tingkat Kecerdasan dari Chatbot untuk Mempengaruhi Kepercayaan Pengguna dalam Aplikasi Telekonsultasi Kesehatan. J. Sistem Info. Bisnis, 13(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.21456/vol13iss1pp78-87
  27. Prentice, C., Han, X. Y., Hua, L.-L., & Hu, L. (2019). The influence of identity-driven customer engagement on purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 47, 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.12.014
  28. Santo, P. E., & Marques, A. M. A. (2022). Determinants of the online purchase intention: hedonic motivations, prices, information and trust. Baltic Journal of Management, 17(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-04-2021-0140
  29. Shi, Y. (2024). The Role of Social Support on Consumers ’ Purchase Intention in the Context of Live Streaming E- commerce : The Evidence from China. 1–26
  30. Singh, S., Singh, N., Kalinić, Z., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J. (2021). Assessing determinants influencing continued use of live streaming services: An extended perceived value theory of streaming addiction. Expert Systems with Applications, 168, 114241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114241
  31. SmartPLS. (n.d.). SmartPLS 4.1.1.2. https://smartpls.com/downloads
  32. Syastra, M. T., & Wangdra, Y. (2018). Analisis Online Impulse Buying dengan menggunakan Framework SOR. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis, 8(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.21456/vol8iss2pp133-140
  33. Thakur, R. (2019). The moderating role of customer engagement experiences in customer satisfaction–loyalty relationship. European Journal of Marketing, 53(7), 1278–1310. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0895
  34. Wang, M., Sun, L.-L., & Hou, J.-D. (2021). How Emotional Interaction Affects Purchase Intention in Social Commerce: The Role of Perceived Usefulness and Product Type. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, Volume 14, 467–481. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S301286
  35. Wismiarsi, T., Pangaribuan, C. H., Prayitno, S. B., & Ainin, A. Q. (2024). The influences of content interactivity on purchase intention: An engagement mediation. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024094
  36. Wohn, D. Y., Freeman, G., & McLaughlin, C. (2018). Explaining Viewers’ Emotional, Instrumental, and Financial Support Provision for Live Streamers. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174048
  37. Wongkitrungrueng, A., & Assarut, N. (2020). The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. Journal of Business Research, 117(November 2017), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.032
  38. Xin, M., Liu, W., & Jian, L. (2024). Live streaming product display or social interaction: How do they influence consumer intention and behavior? A heuristic-systematic perspective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 67, 101437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101437
  39. Yoong, L. C., Lian, S. B., Yoong, L. C., & Lian, S. B. (2019). Customer Engagement in Social Media and Purchase Intentions in the Hotel Industry Customer Engagement in Social Media and Purchase Intentions in the Hotel Industry. 9(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i1/5363
  40. Yu, F., & Zheng, R. (2022). The effects of perceived luxury value on customer engagement and purchase intention in live streaming shopping. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34(6), 1303–1323. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-08-2021-0564

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-07-19 20:53:37

No citation recorded.