DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.50.3.2021.339-350

PERBANDINGAN REGISTRABILITAS MEREK SUARA DI UNI EROPA, AUSTRALIA DAN INDONESIA SERTA PROBLEMATIKANYA

*Markus Yohanis Hage orcid  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Nusa Cendana, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Masalah-Masalah Hukum under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Tujuan artikel ini adalah membahas problematika merek suara di Indonesia dengan membandingkannya dengan isu yang sama di Uni Eropa dan Australia. Dibandingkan Uni Eropa dan Australia, yang pengaturan merek suaranya telah lebih maju, Indonesia masih menyisakan masalah berupa ketiadaan definisi merek suara dan ketiadaan syarat khusus terkait registralibitas merek suara berserta contohnya mengenai notasi, rekaman suara, sonogram dan termasuk durasinya sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum ketika suatu merek suara didaftarkan. Disarankan agar pihak berwenang terkait di Indonesia perlu secara tepat mendefinisikan merek suara sekaligus menentukan secara jelas syarat registrabilitas merek suara di Indonesia.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Merek Suara; Notasi; Sonogram; Rekaman Suara; Registrabilitas

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
REKONSTRUKSI PENCABUTAN HAK ATAS TANAH DAN KONSINYASI DALAM PENGADAAN TANAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM MEMBANGUN MODEL DESA ANTI POLITIK UANG SEBAGAI STRATEGI BAWASLU DALAM MENCEGAH PILKADA CURANG PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU) DALAM MASA PANDEMI COVID-19: ANTARA SOLUSI DAN JEBAKAN More recent articles
Most cited articles
PERLINDUNGAN EKSPRESI BUDAYA TRADISIONAL DALAM SISTEM HUKUM KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA DALAM PEMBINAAN NARAPIDANA ANAK (STUDI DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN KLAS II B ANAK PONTIANAK) IMPLEMENTASI DIVERSI TERHADAP ANAK YANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM (STUDI KASUS DI PULAU LOMBOK) Kebijakan Mediasi Penal Pada Kasus Pencurian di Kepolisian Surakarta PERKEMBANGAN PEMILIHAN PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN DI INDONESIA More cited articles
  1. Bretonniere, J. F., & Rodari, S. (2009). Global-Protecting and enforcing non-traditional trademarks. Building and enforcing intellectual property value. IP Value
  2. Calboli, I. (2018). Chocolate, Fashion, Toys and Cabs: The Misunderstood Distinctiveness of Non-Traditional Trademarks. IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 49, 1–4
  3. Calboli, I., & Senftleben, M. R. F. (2018). The Protection of non-traditional trademarks: critical perspectives (First Edit). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press
  4. Carapeto, R. (2016). A Reflection About the Introduction of Non-Traditional Trademarks. Waseda Bulletin of Comparative Law, 34, 25–60
  5. Clarke, B., & Kapnoullas, S. (2001). The New Forms of Registrable Marks: Market Uptake in the First Five Years. Deakin Law Review, 6(1), 70–90
  6. Court of Justice EU. (2003). Court of Justice EU 27 November 2003, Judgment Of The Court (Sixth Chamber) 27 November 2003. Retrieved from https://www.ippt.eu/sites/default/files/2003/IPPT20031127_ECJ_Shield_Mark_-_soundmark.pdf
  7. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual. (2006). Nomor Pendaftaran D002006027137. Retrieved from https://pdki-indonesia.dgip.go.id/detail/D002006027137?type=trademark&keyword=D002006027137
  8. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual. (2017). Nomor Pendaftaran D002017018614. Retrieved from https://pdki-indonesia.dgip.go.id/detail/D002017018614?type=trademark&keyword=D002017018614
  9. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual. (2020a). Nomor Pendaftaran IDM000714016. Retrieved from https://pdki-indonesia.dgip.go.id/detail/D002017044125?type=trademark&keyword=IDM000714016
  10. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual. (2020b). Nomor Pendaftaran IDM00075474. Retrieved from https://pdki-indonesia.dgip.go.id/search?type=trademark&keyword=IDM00075474&id=D002017044125
  11. European Union. (2015). Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks
  12. Gheewala, S. (2007). Singapore Sling: WIPO Passes the Buck on Meaningful Reform of International Trademark Law. The DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 17(2), 305–337
  13. Kudrina, Y. (2018). Non-Traditional Trade Marks And The Abolition Of The Requirement For Graphical Representation - EU Trade Mark Registration Process. Stockholm University. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.se/smash/get/diva2:1195299/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  14. Lukose, L. P. (2015). Non-Traditional Trademarks: A Critique. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 57(2), 197–215
  15. Rissy, Y. Y. W. (2020). Memahami Rezim Kekayaan Intelektual Internasional dan Indonesia. Salatiga: Griya Media
  16. Sandri, S., & Rizzo, S. (2003). Non-conventional trade marks and Community law. Thurmaston, Leicester: MARQUES, the Association of European Trade Mark Owners
  17. Scardamaglia, A., & Adams, M. (2016). Registering Non-Traditional Signs as Trade Marks in Australia: A Retrospective. Australian Intellectual Property Journal, 26(3), 149–163
  18. Seville, C. (2009). EU Intellectual Property Law and Policy. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing
  19. Vaver, D. (2005). Unconventional And Well-Known Trade Marks. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 1–19
  20. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2008). Standing Committee on the law of trademarks, industrial designs and geographical indications (Nineteenth Session): Representation and Description of Non-Traditional Marks Possible Areas of Convergence. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_19/sct_19_2.pdf
  21. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2009). Smell, Sound and Taste – Getting a Sense of Non-Traditional Marks. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2009/01/article_0003.html
  22. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2018). Guide to the International Registration of Marks under the Madrid Agreement and the Madrid Protocol. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_455_2018.pdf

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-06-19 22:07:18

No citation recorded.