PENGHENTIAN PROSES PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA INFORMASI PUBLIK AKIBAT PERMOHONAN TIDAK BERITIKAD BAIK DAN BERSUNGGUH SUNGGUH

Tri Cahya Indra Permana, Ahmad Ahmad
DOI: 10.14710/mmh.53.1.2024.1-11
Copyright (c) 2024 Masalah-Masalah Hukum License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

Public information disclosure disputes requested by the public can be terminated if the request is not in good faith and earnest (vexatious request) but must be by the principles of reasonable justice. This research method is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The research results show that the termination of the public information dispute resolution process because it was not serious and in good faith (vexatious request) was not based on the general principles of good justice and the principle that decisions can be appealed. However, other things also need to be improved in the legal provisions made by the information commission regarding the mechanism for terminating the process of resolving public information disputes.

 


Full Text: PDF

Keywords

Public Information Disputes; Good Faith; Judicial Principles

References

Dockrell, M., & Green, D. (2019). Context is crucial: Wading through public health information. Practice Nursing, 30(9), 456–457. https://doi.org/10.12968/pnur.2019.30.9.456

Harun, T., & Jumarianto, J. (2022). Pelaksanaan Mediasi Sengketa Informasi Publik Di Komisi Informasi Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan. As-Siyasah: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 7(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.31602/as.v7i2.8962

Komarudin, K. (2023). Information System Development for Receiving and Handling Customer Complaints in Public Services. Devotion : Journal of Research and Community Service, 4(5), 1110–1115. https://doi.org/10.59188/devotion.v4i5.468

Kovačević, A. (2023). Institucije za ostvarivanje i zaštitu prava na informacije od javnog značaja i zaštitu podataka o ličnosti. In Uporednopravni izazovi u savremenom pravu—In memoriam dr Stefan Andonović (pp. 435–447). Institut za uporedno pravo; Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujevcu. https://doi.org/10.56461/ZR_23.SA.UPISP_AK1

Kristiyanto, E. N. (2016). Urgensi Keterbukaan Informasi Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum DE JURE, 16(2), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2016.V16.231-244

Mahendrayana, I. A., Junaidi, M., Manurung, M., & Sudarmanto, K. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Komisi Informasi Dalam Pembinaan Pejabat Pengelola Informasi Dan Dokumentasi Dalam Sengketa Informasi Publik. Journal Juridisch, 2(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.26623/jj.v2i1.8945

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Prenada Media.

Muhari, Kholil Jamalullail, & Dewi Widowati. (2023). Information Dispute Mediation Communication Model (Case Study of Information Dispute Mediation by the Information Commission of South Kalimantan Province). Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani, 3(3), 567–575. https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v3i3.2461

Muhshi, A. (2018). Pemenuhan Hak atas Informasi Publik sebagai Tanggung Jawab Negara dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance. Lentera Hukum, 5(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v5i1.7284

Rabska, T. (2023). Nadzór nad samorządem robotniczym. Studia Prawnicze / The Legal Studies, 4, 122–147. https://doi.org/10.37232/sp.1964.4.4

Tejedo-Romero, F., & Ferraz Esteves Araujo, J. F. (2023). Critical factors influencing information disclosure in public organisations. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 315. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01814-8

Vučković, J. (2023). Slobodan Pristup Informacija Od Javnog Značaja I Medijske Usluge. Pravna Regulativa Usluga u Nacionalnim Zakonodavstvima i Pravu Evropske Unije, 529–545. https://doi.org/10.46793/XIXMajsko.529V

Weinstein, E. S., Gluckman, W. A., Dilling, S., & Paul, J. S. (2024). Public Information Management. In Ciottone’s Disaster Medicine (pp. 157–163). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-80932-0.00026-4

Wibawa, K. C. S. (2019). Urgensi Keterbukaan Informasi dalam Pelayanan Publik sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.218-234

Xiao, A., Overton, H., & Li, R. (2019). Communicating With Nonprofit Publics In China: Applying the RISP Model to Prosocial Intentions. Journal of Promotion Management, 25(1), 82–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2018.1427653

Yanti, H. (2022). Implementasi Penyelesain Sengketa Informasi Publik pada Komisi Informasi Provinsi Jambi. Wajah Hukum, 6(2), 453. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i2.1085