skip to main content

INDIGENOUS WOMEN IN THE DRAFT LAW OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES: AN APPROACH BASED ON LEGAL NEUTRALITY AND PANCASILA VALUES

*Rika Saraswati orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law and Communication, Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Masalah-Masalah Hukum under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples’ Affairs in Indonesia has sparked significant debate, particularly concerning the protection and recognition of Indigenous women's rights. Indigenous Peoples in Indonesia have long maintained distinct socio-cultural identities, yet continue to face legal challenges, exacerbated by overlapping regulations that often neglect or inadequately address their specific needs, especially the rights of Indigenous women. Although the Indonesian Constitution recognises Indigenous Peoples, the enforcement of their rights remains inconsistent, particularly regarding gender equality. This research compares two versions of the draft law: one proposed by the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) and another drafted by Indigenous Peoples and their coalitions. While both versions aim to recognise Indigenous Peoples legally, they differ significantly in their treatment of Indigenous women’s rights. The DPR’s version fails to adequately address gender equality or the collective rights of Indigenous women. In contrast, the Indigenous Peoples’ version explicitly acknowledges their rights, particularly regarding land and natural resource management. The research highlights the double marginalisation faced by Indigenous women—both within their communities and in broader societal structures. Patriarchal values within Indigenous communities and the state often exclude women from decision-making processes, leaving them vulnerable to violence, poverty, and further marginalisation. The study argues that gender equality must be a core component of the legal framework to empower Indigenous women, ensuring they are recognised as equal participants in their communities and have legal protection to manage their lands and cultural practices. The comparative analysis suggests that the Indigenous Peoples’ version aligns more closely with international human rights standards, especially regarding gender equality. However, challenges remain, such as the exclusion of women from customary decision-making bodies. This research calls for a legal framework that fully incorporates gender equality into Indigenous rights, reflecting the Pancasila values of equality, social justice, and respect for diversity, and ensuring the recognition of Indigenous women as key stakeholders in the preservation of their heritage and rights.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Indigenous Peoples’ Rights; Gender Equality; Indigenous Women; Draft Law; Legal Recognition

Article Metrics:

  1. Aditya, Z. F., & Al-fatih, S. (2023). The Legal Protection System of Indigenous Peoples in Southeast Asia. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(2), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.4.320
  2. Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara. (2021). Pernyataan Sikap Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Terkait Penolakan Partai GOLKAR atas Pembahasan RUU Masyarakat Adat. Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara. https://aman.or.id/news/read/1019
  3. Arys Aditya. (2014). Pemerintah Didesak Bentuk Komisi Nasional Masyarakat Adat. Bisnis.Com. https://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20140204/79/201013/pemerintah-didesak-bentuk-komisi-nasional-masyarakat-adat-#goog_rewarded
  4. Barir, M. (2014). Kesetaraan dan Kelas Sosial dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 15(1), 61–92. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2014.1501-04
  5. Bartlett, K. T. (1990). Feminist Legal Methods. Harvard Law Review, 103(4), 829–888. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341478
  6. Bhawono, A. (2024). Tahun Makin Muram untuk Masyarakat Adat: Catahu AMAN. BETAHITA. https://betahita.id/news/detail/10800/tahun-makin-muram-untuk-masyarakat-adat-catahu-aman-.html?v=1734856376
  7. Bhawono, A. (2025). Tanpa Perlindungan UU, Masyarakat Adat Kian Rentan Konflik. BETAHITA. https://betahita.id/news/detail/11044/tanpa-perlindungan-uu-masyarakat-adat-kian-rentan-konflik.html?v=1745539279
  8. Cain, P. A. (1991). Feminist Legal Scholarship. Iowa Law Review, 77, 19–39. https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs/276/
  9. Celano, B. (2013). Normative Legal Positivism, Neutrality, and the Rule of Law. In J. Ferrer Beltrán, J. J. Moreso, & D. M. Papayannis (Eds), Neutrality and Theory of Law (pp. 175–202). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6067-7_9
  10. CNN Indonesia. (2024). Golkar Ungkap Alasan Tak Lanjutkan Bahas RUU Hukum Masyarakat Adat. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20240404191618-32-1083026/golkar-ungkap-alasan-tak-lanjutkan-bahas-ruu-hukum-masyarakat-adat
  11. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–168. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8/
  12. Cuneo, I. M. M. (2020). ILO Convention 169 in the Inter-American Human Rights System: Consultation and Consent. The International Journal of Human Rights, 24(2–3), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1677622
  13. Davis, M. (2012). To Bind or Not to Bind: The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Five Years On. Australian International Law Journal, 19, 17–48. (informit.329563918658659). https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.329563918658659
  14. Denis, A. N. N. B. (2018). Multiple Identities... Multiple Marginalities Franco-Ontarian Feminism. Gender & Society, 15(3), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124301015003007
  15. Dowd, N. E. (Ed.). (2003). Feminist Legal Theory: An Anti-Essentialist Reader. NYU Press
  16. Fahmi, C. (2024). The Application of International Cultural Rights in Protecting Indigenous Peoples’ Land Property in Indonesia. AlterNative, 20(1), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801241235261
  17. Fineman, M. A. (2013). Feminist Theory in Law: The Difference It Makes. In Feminist Legal Theories (pp. 213–235). Routledge
  18. Flood, M. (2015). Men and Gender Equality. In Engaging Men in Building Gender Equality (pp. 1–31). Cambridge Scholars Publishing
  19. Flood, M., Dragiewicz, M., & Pease, B. (2021). Resistance and Backlash to Gender Equality. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.137
  20. Fuentes, C. A., & Fernández, J. E. (2022). The Four Worlds of Recognition of Indigenous Rights. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(13), 3202–3220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1797478
  21. Good Forest Governance Needs Good Forest Information. (2024). Pengesahan Ruu Masyarakat Adat Pada 2025: Menanti Tindakan Nyata DPR dan Pemerintah kepada Masyarakat Adat. Good Forest Governance Needs Good Forest Information. https://repository.undwi.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/jeail_v15n2_10.pdf
  22. Hanna, P., & Vanclay, F. (2013). Human Rights, Indigenous Peoples and the Concept of Free, Prior and Informed Consent. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 31(2), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.780373
  23. Hart, H. L. A. (1979). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press. Heise, L. L. (1998). Violence Against Women: An Integrated, Ecological Framework. Violence Against Women, 4(3), 262–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801298004003002
  24. Jarboe, M. R. (2010). Collective Rights to Indigenous Land in Carcieri v. Salazar. Boston College Third World Law Journal, 30(2), 395–416. https://lira.bc.edu/works/publication-article/6jew6-6v674
  25. Kelsen, H. (2005). Pure Theory of Law. Lawbook Exchange
  26. Komisi Nasional Anti Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan (Komnas Perempuan). (2024). Tim Ahli dan Gugus Kerja Perempuan dan Kebhinnekaan. Kertas Posisi: Pandangan Komisi Nasional Anti Kekerasan Terpadap Perempuan (Komnas Perempuan)Terpadap Perlindungan Hak dan Keadilan Substantif Bagi Perempuan Adat Dalam RUU Masyarakat Hukum Adat. https://komnasperempuan.go.id/kertas-posisi-detail/kertas-posisi-pandangan-komisi-nasional-anti-kekerasan-terhadap-perempuan-komnas-perempuan-terhadap-perlindungan-hak-dan-keadilan-substantif-bagi-perempuan-adat-dalam-ruu-masyarakat-hukum-adat-komisi-nasional-anti-kekerasan-terhadap-perempuan
  27. Larsen, P. B., & Gilbert, J. (2020). Indigenous Rights and ILO Convention 169: Learning from the Past and Challenging the Future*. International Journal of Human Rights, 24(2–3), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1677615
  28. MacKinnon, C. (1989). Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Parvard University Press
  29. Media Indonesia. (2022). Sekjen AMAN: RUU Masyarakat Adat belum disahkan DPR RI karena ditolak Fraksi PDIP dan Golkar. Mediaindonesia.Com. https://mediaindonesia.com/nusantara/533660/sekjen-aman-ruu-masyarakat-adat-belum-disahkan-dpr-ri-karena-ditolak-fraksi-pdip-dan-golkar#google_vignette
  30. Nur, A. I., Al Fatih, S., & Intania, C. C. (2024). Revitalising Indigenous Rights Participation in Mining Lawmaking Process: Evaluation and Proposal for Indonesia. Law Reform, 20(1), 188–210. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v20i1.63684
  31. Panja DPR. (2020). Sepakat RUU Masyarakat Adat Jadi Usul Inisiatif DPR. Panja DPR. https://madaniberkelanjutan.id/panja-dpr-sepakat-ruu-masyarakat-adat-jadi-usul-inisiatif-dpr/
  32. Rumiartha, I. N. P. B., Astariyani, N. L. G., & Indradewi, A. A. S. N. (2022). Human Rights of Indigenous People in Indonesia: A Constitutional Approach. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 15(2), 395–402. https://doi.org/10.14330/jeail.2022.15.2.10
  33. Sander, D. (1955). Collective Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 65(1), 386–408. https://www.jstor.org/stable/762620%0A
  34. Saraswati, R. (2009). Perempuan dan Penyelesaian Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT). PT. Citra Aditya Bakti
  35. Saraswati, R. (2014). Public and Private Dichotomy in the Legal System: Indonesian Women’s Access to Justice when Dealing with Domestic Violence [University of Wollongong]. https://ro.uow.edu.au/ndownloader/files/50368374/1
  36. Saraswati, R. (2026). Hukum Perlindungan Anak (Third edition Draft Version, Ongoing). PT. Citra Aditya Bakti
  37. Stubbs, M. (1986). Feminism and Legal Positivism. Australian Journal of Law and Society, 3(1986), 63–91. https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AUJlLawSoc/1986/6.html
  38. Sukirno, & Natalis, A. (2025). Majority Bias in Legal Politics: Discriminatory Citizenship Document Services for Local Religion Believers in Indonesia. Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies, 15(1), 241–268. https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl/2146
  39. Thontowi, J. (2023). Perlindungan dan Pengakuan Masyarakat Adat dan Tantangannya dalam Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 20(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol20.iss1.art2
  40. Vrdoljak, A. F. (2018). Indigenous Peoples, World Heritage, and Human Rights. International Journal of Cultural Property, 25(3), 245–281. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739118000218
  41. Wani, K. A., & Ariana, L. (2018). Impact of Climate Change on Indigenous People and Adaptive Capacity of Bajo Tribe, Indonesia. Environmental Claims Journal, 30(4), 302–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10406026.2018.1504380
  42. Wibowo, A., & Demadevina, N. (2021). Hak Kolektif Perempuan Adat Wajib Dimaktubkan dalam Undang-Undang Masyarakat Adat. Kertas Kerja Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara. https://aman.or.id/news/read/1055
  43. Widiarty, W. S. (2024). Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Publika Global Media
  44. Wong, J. (1999). The Anti-Essentialism v. Essentialism Debate in Feminist Legal Theory: The Debate and Beyond. William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice, 5(2), 273–296. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl/vol5/iss2/2/
  45. Y. Adiningsih. (2025). Langkah Baru Komnas PAM untuk Lindungi Masyarakat Adat. Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara. https://mongabay.co.id/2025/07/26/langkap-baru-komnas-pam-untuk-lindungi-masyarakat-adat/#:~:text=Dia optimis SNP menjawab masalap,akan menjadi catatan sejarap saja.”
  46. Yupsanis, A. (2010). ILO Convention No. 169 Concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries 1989–2009: An Overview. Nordic Journal of International Law, 79(3), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181010X512576

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-03-03 08:12:21

No citation recorded.