DESIGN PROCESS ANALYSIS OF A MULTI-STOREY PARKING FACILITY  AS FUNCTIONAL SUPPORT BUILDING

Endah Tisnawati; Dilla Eka Septiyanti; Mas Nadila Surya Nandini

doi:10.14710/mdl.26.1.2026.26-38

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mdl.26.1.2026.26-38

DESIGN PROCESS ANALYSIS OF A MULTI-STOREY PARKING FACILITY AS FUNCTIONAL SUPPORT BUILDING

*Endah Tisnawati

- Architecture Study Programme, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Technology Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Dilla Eka Septiyanti - Architecture Study Programme, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Technology Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Mas Nadila Surya Nandini - Architecture Study Programme, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Technology Yogyakarta, Indonesia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{MDL83795,
    author = {Endah Tisnawati and Dilla Septiyanti and Mas Nandini},
    title = {DESIGN PROCESS ANALYSIS OF A MULTI-STOREY PARKING FACILITY  AS FUNCTIONAL SUPPORT BUILDING},
    journal = {MODUL},
  volume = {26},
    number = {1},
    year = {2026},
    keywords = {Campus context; Comparative case study; Design process analysis; Functional support building; Multi-storey parking facility; Technical standards.},
    abstract = { Multi-story parking buildings play a critical role in addressing the challenges of expanding campus vehicle populations and limited land resources. However, design evaluations often focus on the building's final physical performance, while ignoring how technical decisions are made throughout the design process. This study aims to reconstruct and analyze the architectural design process of multi-story parking buildings as functional support structures to understand the influence of analysis stages, technical standard application, and decision-making on the final design quality. The research uses a qualitative approach, with comparative case studies, based on document analysis of two design alternatives for the same project, location, and program. The data includes site information, capacity calculations, application of national parking standards, design development records, and final drawings, which are then analyzed descriptively to trace the causal relationship between the depth of the process and the design results. The results show that both alternatives meet the minimum requirements, but the iterative, evidence-based process yields more efficient circulation, more rational structural integration, and higher operational readiness. The findings confirm that design quality is primarily determined by the depth and thoroughness of the design process, rather than by the building's formal expression alone. },
   issn = {2598-327X},   pages = {26--38}  doi = {10.14710/mdl.26.1.2026.26-38},
    url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/modul/article/view/83795}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Multi-story parking buildings play a critical role in addressing the challenges of expanding campus vehicle populations and limited land resources. However, design evaluations often focus on the building's final physical performance, while ignoring how technical decisions are made throughout the design process. This study aims to reconstruct and analyze the architectural design process of multi-story parking buildings as functional support structures to understand the influence of analysis stages, technical standard application, and decision-making on the final design quality. The research uses a qualitative approach, with comparative case studies, based on document analysis of two design alternatives for the same project, location, and program. The data includes site information, capacity calculations, application of national parking standards, design development records, and final drawings, which are then analyzed descriptively to trace the causal relationship between the depth of the process and the design results. The results show that both alternatives meet the minimum requirements, but the iterative, evidence-based process yields more efficient circulation, more rational structural integration, and higher operational readiness. The findings confirm that design quality is primarily determined by the depth and thoroughness of the design process, rather than by the building's formal expression alone.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues

Keywords: Campus context; Comparative case study; Design process analysis; Functional support building; Multi-storey parking facility; Technical standards.

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 26, No 1 (2026): MODUL vol 26 nomor 1 tahun 2026 (article in press)

Most cited articles

EVALUATION ON SUMBER SENENG NATURAL PARK, REMBANG AS TOURISM OBJECT USING ADO-ODTWA ANALYSIS RESPON RUMAH TRADISIONAL KUDUS TERHADAP IKLIM TROPIS PEMILIHAN PEDESTRIAN WAYS DITINJAU DARI PERSEPSI PENGGUNA DI KORIDOR JALAN GUNUNG SAHARI JAKARTA PUSAT KAJIAN PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH KAMPUS JURUSAN ARSITEKTUR FAKULTAS TEKNIK UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO PEMAHAMAN TENTANG LINGKUNGAN BERKELANJUTAN More cited articles

Agustina, M., Minaka, U.S., & Kamil, A.I. (2025). Peningkatan Pengetahuan Siswa Sekolah Bersama Komunitas Ibu Profesional Palembang Tentang Program Studi dan Profesi Arsitek Melalui Simulasi Profesi. Jurnal Abdimas Mandiri, 9(3), 497–504. https://doi.org/10.36982/jam.v9i3.6170
Alansyah, E. (2023). Identifikasi kebutuhan fasilitas ruang parkir pada kawasan pendidikan tinggi: Studi kasus lingkungan kampus. Jurnal Transportasi Multimoda, 21(2), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.26740/mitrans.v3n2.p176-183
Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2004). SNI 03-1733-2004 Tata cara perencanaan lingkungan perumahan di perkotaan. Jakarta: BSN
Bahariansyah, M. A. N., Krisnamurti, K., & Kriswardhana, W. (2021). Perencanaan Gedung Parkir Bertingkat Terpusat MKWU, Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Pascasarjana, dan Perpustakaan Universitas Jember. Jurnal Ilmiah MITSU (Media Informasi Teknik Sipil Universitas Wiraraja), 9(1), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.24929/ft.v9i1.993
Chu, C.-R., & Su, Z.-Y. (2023). Natural ventilation design for underground parking garages. Building and Environment, 227, 109784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109784
Clements, R. (2019). Parking and the City. Planning Theory & Practice, 20(3), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1627120
Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Darat. (1998). Pedoman teknis penyelenggaraan fasilitas parkir. Jakarta: Departemen Perhubungan Republik Indonesia
Dukhniak, I., & Terletska, Y. (2022). ANALYSIS OF WORLD EXPERIENCE IN DESIGNING PARKING IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT. Urban development and spatial planning. https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2022.80.166-179
Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766
Herdiansyah, H., Sugiyanto, Octavianto, A. G., Aritonang, E. G., Imaduddin, M. N., Dedi, & Rilaningrum, M. (2017). Capacity analysis of parking lot and volume of vehicle toward sustainable parking convenience. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 88(1), 012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/88/1/012031
Kysil, S. (2016). The principles of architectural and planning organization of multi-storey parking garages (exemplified by the largest cities). https://er.knutd.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/2909/2/AMIT%201%20(34)2016.pdf
Lawson, B. (2020). How designers think: The design process demystified (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429254258
Mariya, L., Inayah, S., Ismail, R., Djoa, D. & Sya’ban, M. (2024). PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS PROYEK DI PERGURUAN TINGGI Teori dan Praktik. https://press.eduped.org/index.php/pedia/issue/view/11
Oxman, R. (2017). Thinking difference: Theories and models of parametric design thinking. Design Studies, 52, 4-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.06.001
Salama, A. M. (2015). Spatial design education: New directions for pedagogy in architecture. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 4(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315610276
Salama, A. M. (2021). Architectural education today: Cross-cultural perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003128323
Tantiyaswasdikul, K. (2019). Framework for Design Thinking Outside the Design Profession: An Analysis of Design Thinking Implementations. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS). https://doi.org/10.56261/jars.v16i1.183316
Wójcik, J., Świętoniowska, J., & Jakieła, J. (2025). Career Agility for Future Employees. An Innovative BE(A)ST Framework for the Digital Era. Journal of Modern Science. https://doi.org/10.13166/jms%2F207583

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-07-02 19:34:17

No citation recorded.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The copyright of received articles is assigned to the author (s). The author (s) have the right to the articles that have been published. The Editorial Team of MODUL and the Author(s) strive to ensure that no errors occur in the articles that have been published, both data errors and statements in the articles.

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship in this journal.
The journal allows the authors to hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions.
Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during submission, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.