DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v17i2.22499

Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Kajian Lingkungan Hidup Strategis (KLHS) dalam Perencanaan Tata Ruang Kota Salatiga

*Paulus Bimo Wijayanto  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Maryono Maryono  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is a process by evaluating environmental impacts and ensuring that the principles of sustainability are integrated in decision making. Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) in Indonesia is regulated in a law stipulated by the government which stipulates that it is the duty of both the government and local governments to carry out both development planning and spatial planning. Salatiga City in spatial planning in accordance with the existing guidelines implements SEA, namely in making the Regional Spatial Plan and Detailed Spatial Plan. The rules and policies that are continuously updated by the government regarding the procedures for implementing SEA require understanding from stakeholders who have an interest in Policies, Plans and Programs (KRP) in spatial planning in Salatiga City, with good quality understanding by stakeholders can ensure that the stages of implementing SEA running well and integrating SEA into the KRP spatial planning that ensures environmental damage can be minimized. The purpose of this research is to examine the effectiveness of the implementation of SEA in spatial planning in the city of Salatiga and it is hoped that it can provide alternative steps for implementing SEA which can be used as a direction in the implementation of SEA based on existing facts and conditions. The data used in this study consist of primary data and secondary data which refer to the SEA implementation tools, namely Rules and Policies, Documents and Reports, Institutional Tools, Implementation Standard Operating Procedures, Monitoring, Evaluation and Feedback. The research method used is a mixed method research by combining qualitative and quantitative analysis. From the results of the analysis, it can be seen that the implementation of SEA in the City of Salatiga in spatial planning still needs to be considered in order to run effectively, even though the resulting SEA process has adjusted to the existing regulations but still in activities such as monitoring, evaluation and feedback still need to be carried out in an effective manner. maximum because these activities constitute control over decision making in Activities, Plans and Programs in the resulting spatial planning and stakeholder understanding of the institutional instruments of SEA in Salatiga City still need to be improved because not all existing instruments are understood and are still in a category that is not all in categories really understand evenly so that steps are needed that are adjusted to the existing conditions in an effort to increase the effectiveness of the implementation of SEA so that the resulting SEA can run effectively and maximally.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: SEA; effectiveness; spatial planning

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Analisis Genangan Banjir Akibat Debit Puncak di DAS Baubau Menggunakan HEC-RAS dan GIS Pengaruh Kebijakan Otonomi Khusus Papua Terhadap Pembangunan Prasarana Pendidikan dan Kesehatan di Kabupaten Manokwari Selatan, Provinsi Papua Barat Identifikasi Karakteristik Kawasan Informal Pesisir Kota Bandar Lampung dan Kerentanan terhadap Dampak Perubahan Iklim (Studi Kasus : Kelurahan Kota Karang dan Kangkung) Agenda Riset Prioritas Tentang Komersialisasi Ruang Terbuka Hijau Publik dan Kaitannya dengan Pandemi Covid-19 Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya Pemanfaatan Pocket Park Sebagai Infrastruktur Hijau di Permukiman Islami (Studi Kasus: Kampung Arab, Kota Malang) More recent articles
Most cited articles
Evaluasi Proses Konsolidasi Tanah Kawasan Permukiman Kumuh Bantaran Sungai Kurau Klaster 1 Desa Kurau Berdasarkan Persepsi Masyarakat Cover Perilaku Masyarakat dalam Mengelola Sampah di Kota Bima Nusa Tenggara Barat Preferensi Pengunjung Terhadap Daya Tarik Objek Wisata Teluk Palu di Kota Palu MODEL PEMETAAN RISIKO KEKERINGAN DI KABUPATEN BIMA, NUSA TENGGARA BARAT More cited articles
  1. Asdak, Chay. 2014. Kajian Lingkungan Hidup Strategis Jalan Menuju Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press
  2. Asep Warlan Yusuf, Pengaturan Dan Kebijakan Penataan Ruang Dalam Perspektif Pembangunan Berwawasan Lingkungan. PRO JUSTITIA Tahun XVIII Nomor 2 April 2000
  3. Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi edisi 2. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Salatiga. (2018). Kota Salatiga dalam Angka 2018. Salatiga : Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Salatiga
  5. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kota Salatiga. 2012. Kajian Lingkungan Hidup Strategis (KLHS) Rencana Detail Tata Ruang Wilayah (RDTR) Kota Salatiga Tahun 2012-2032. Salatiga : Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kota Salatiga
  6. Bambang Setyabudi, Kajian Lingkungan Hidup Strategis (KLHS) Sebagai Kerangka Berfikir Dalam Perencanaan Tata Ruang Wilayah. Deputi Bidang Tata Lingkungan Kementerian Negara Lingkungan Hidup Bekerjasama dengan ESP2 – DANIDA, Jakarta, 2007
  7. Bina, O. (2008). Context and systems: Thinking more broadly about effectiveness in Strategic Environmental Assessment in China. Environmental Management, 42(4), 717–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9123-5
  8. Brontowiyono, W. (2016). KLHS Untuk RTRW dengan Pendekatan Daya Dukung Lingkungan. Yogyakarta: Gre Publishing
  9. Creswell, John. W. (2010). Research Design Pendekatan kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan. Mixed; Cetakan ke-1, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  10. De Montis, A. (2013). Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment of spatial planning tools. A study on the Italian provinces. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 41, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.02.004
  11. Hegazy, I. R. (2015). Integrating strategic environmental assessment into spatial planning in Egypt. Environmental Development, 15, 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.05.001
  12. I Gusti Ayu Jatiana Manik Wedanti, Kajian Lingkungan Hidup Strategis Sebagai Bentuk Integrasi Prinsip Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Dalam Perencanaan Tata Ruang Wilayah. Jurnal Magister Hukum Hudayana, Vol. 5, No. 3 : 526 – 542, September, 2016
  13. Illsley, B., Jackson, T., & Deasley, N. (2014). Spheres of public conversation: Experiences in strategic environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 44, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.08.001
  14. Kartono, K. (1996). Pengantar Metodologi Riset Sosial. Bandung: Mandar Maju
  15. Kementerian Negara Lingkungan Hidup. (2007). Buku Pegangan Kajian Lingkungan Hidup Strategis. Jakarta : Kementerian Negara Lingkungan Hidup
  16. Latifah Amir. Rencana Salah Satu Instrumen Hukum Administrasi Dalam Menentukan Tujuan Pemerintahan. Vol 2 No 2: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2011
  17. Li, T., Wang, H., Deng, B., Ren, W., & Xu, H. (2016). Strategic environmental assessment performance factors and their interaction: An empirical study in China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 59, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.03.008
  18. Lobos, V., & Partidario, M. (2014). Theory versus practice in Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 48, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.04.004
  19. Monteiro, M. B., & Partidário, M. R. (2017). Governance in Strategic Environmental Assessment: Lessons from the Portuguese practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 65(1), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.04.007
  20. Partidario, M., Augusto, B., Vicente, G., & Lobos, V. (2009). Learning the Practice of Strategic-Based SEA. Paper presented in 29th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment Accra, 17-22 May, 2009, (May), 17–22
  21. Peraturan Menteri Negara Lingkungan Hidup No. 09 Tahun 2011 Pedoman Umum Kajian Lingkungan Hidup Strategis. 17 November 2011. Berita Negara RI Tahun 2011, No. 729. Jakarta
  22. Peraturan Menteri Negara Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan No. P.69/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/12/2017 Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 46 Tahun 2016 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelenggaraan Kajian Lingkungan Hidup Strategis. 15 Januari 2018. Berita Negara RI Tahun 2018, No. 89. Jakarta
  23. Peraturan Pemerintah No.46 Tahun 2016 Tata Cara Penyelenggaraan Kajian Lingkungan Hidup Strategis. 31 Oktober 2016. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2016, No. 228. Jakarta
  24. Rahadian, Strategi Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Manajemen STIAMI Volume III, No. 01, Februari, 2016
  25. Rega, C., & Baldizzone, G. (2015). Public participation in Strategic Environmental Assessment: A practitioners’ perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.007
  26. Ruray, Syaiful Bahri, 2012. Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pemerintah Daerah dalam Pengelolaan dan Pelestarian Fungsi Lingkungan Hidup, Bandung: P.T. Alumni
  27. Sadler, B. (2005). Strategic Environmental Assessment at the Policy Level: Recent Progress, Current Status and Future Prospect. Paper presented in IAIA Global Conference on SEA. Prague, September 26-29, 2005
  28. Setyabudi, Bambang. 2007. Buku Pegangan Kajian Lingkungan Strategis. Jakarta: Deputi Urusan Perencanaan Lingkungan, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup
  29. Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta
  30. Surna T Djajadiningrat, Pembangunan Berkelanjutan dan Berwawasan Lingkungan, Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan, Tahun I NO. 1/1994
  31. Victor, D., & Agamuthu, P. (2014). Policy trends of strategic environmental assessment in Asia. Environmental Science and Policy, 41, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.005

Last update:

  1. Peran Stakeholder dalam Kajian Lingkungan Hidup Strategis Rencana Detail Tata Ruang Kawasan Perkotaan Manokwari

    Yullyus Kocu, Roni Bawole, Thomas Pattiasina, Francine Hematang. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 22 (1), 2023. doi: 10.14710/jil.22.1.228-239

Last update: 2024-11-18 06:03:58

No citation recorded.