DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v21i3.68973

Pendekatan Multi-Kriteria Penentuan Lokasi Potensial Pengembangan Kawasan Permukiman di Kabupaten Ponorogo

*Yonatan Yolius Anggara  -  Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Nursida Arif  -  Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Rizky Arfiyanto  -  Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Pengelolaan pengembangan permukiman yang berkelanjutan merupakan tantangan utama di wilayah dengan dinamika pertumbuhan penduduk tinggi, termasuk Kabupaten Ponorogo. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi faktor dominan dalam pemilihan lokasi permukiman serta memetakan tingkat kesesuaian lahan bagi pengembangan kawasan permukiman. Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) digunakan untuk menentukan bobot relatif dari tujuh parameter, meliputi kemiringan lereng, penggunaan lahan, jenis tanah, jarak terhadap jalan utama, jarak terhadap fasilitas kesehatan, jarak terhadap pusat pendidikan, dan curah hujan. Analisis spasial berbasis Sistem Informasi Geografi (SIG) kemudian digunakan untuk mengklasifikasikan wilayah studi ke dalam empat kategori kesesuaian. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa kemiringan lereng merupakan faktor paling dominan (31,1%), menegaskan pentingnya stabilitas geofisik dalam perencanaan permukiman. Integrasi AHP–SIG menghasilkan empat kategori lokasi potensial: sangat potensial (193,42 km²; 13,6%), potensial (323,00 km²; 22,8%), kurang potensial (404,56 km²; 28,5%), dan tidak potensial (497,78 km²; 35,1%). Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa wilayah dengan aksesibilitas tinggi dan kondisi geofisik stabil lebih sesuai untuk pengembangan permukiman, sementara kawasan dengan risiko geofisik tinggi lebih tepat diarahkan untuk fungsi non-permukiman. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi metodologis melalui integrasi AHP dan SIG sebagai pendekatan komprehensif dalam mendukung pengambilan keputusan tata ruang berbasis data di tingkat regional.
Fulltext
Keywords: Permukiman, AHP, SIG, Ponorogo

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Analisis Pola Spasial Persebaran Penduduk Miskin di Kota Yogyakarta Studi Bibliometrik Faktor Pembangunan Endogen di Indonesia Komparasi Struktur Ruang Kota Tradisional Nagari Kurai V Jorong dengan Struktur Ruang Kota Islam More recent articles
Most cited articles
Efektivitas Program Reklamasi Pasca Tambang Timah di Kecamatan Merawang Kabupaten Bangka Penilaian Sistem Transportasi yang Mengarah Pada Green Transportasi di Kota Surakarta Perilaku Perjalanan pada Akhir Pekan oleh Rumah Tangga yang Tinggal di Daerah Pinggiran Kota Semarang Pasar Tradisional Versus Pasar Modern di Daerah Perkotaan (Studi Kasus: Kecamatan Gondokusuman Kota Yogyakarta) MODEL PEMETAAN RISIKO KEKERINGAN DI KABUPATEN BIMA, NUSA TENGGARA BARAT More cited articles
  1. Abdullah, N. S. (2014). Suitability model based on GIS and MCDA for spatial distribution of settlements in different geographic environments. European Scientific Journal, 10(10), 1–15
  2. Acheampong, R. A. (2019). Urbanization and settlement growth management (pp. 171–203). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02011-8_9
  3. Akyol, E., Alkan, M., & Akgündüz, H. (2015). Determining settlement suitability by geographic information systems and analytical hierarchy process. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 33(2), 325–338
  4. Al-Shaar, W., Faour, G., Al-Shaar, M., & others. (2023). Land suitability analysis for sustainable urban development: A case of Nabatiyeh Region in Lebanon. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28444
  5. Alogayell, H. M., Kamal, A., Alkadi, I. I., & others. (2024). Spatial modeling of land resources and constraints to guide urban development in Saudi Arabia’s NEOM region using geomatics techniques. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2024.1370881
  6. Arca, D., & Keskin Çıtıroğlu, H. (2023). Evaluation of settlement suitability with regards to natural environmental ingredients using GIS and AHP. In Multi-Criteria Decision-Making in Environmental Studies (pp. 203–222). Özgür Publications
  7. Badan Informasi Geospasial. (2018). Digital Elevation Model Nasional (DEMNAS), resolusi 8 m [Dataset]. BIG. https://tanahair.indonesia.go.id/demnas/
  8. Badan Informasi Geospasial. (2019). Ina-Geoportal: Peta tematik Indonesia [Dataset]. BIG. https://tanahair.indonesia.go.id/portal/
  9. Badan Informasi Geospasial. (2023). OneMap Indonesia: Peta jaringan jalan dan fasilitas kesehatan [Dataset]. BIG. https://onemap.big.go.id/
  10. Bacharz, R., Vitianingsih, A. V., Maukar, A. L., Puspitarini, E. W., & Wati, S. F. A. (2021). Geographical information system for mapping of settlements land potential index. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOIACT53268.2021.9564009
  11. Blachowski, J., Rybakiewicz, W., Warczewski, W., & others. (2016). Zastosowanie analiz wielokryterialnych w GIS do optymalizacji planowania obszarów zabudowy mieszkaniowej na przykładzie Wrocławskiego Obszaru Funkcjonalnego. Journal of Geographical Systems, 6(2), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/j6020020
  12. BPS. (2021). Kabupaten Ponorogo dalam angka 2021. Badan Pusat Statistik
  13. Ceylan, Ş., & Yilmaz, I. (2020). Preparation of medium-scale settlement suitability plans using GIS-based analytical hierarchy process (AHP): The case of Sivas city centre. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 26(4), 673–681
  14. Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing. (2020). CHRS Rainfall Estimates (RFE) [Dataset]. University of California, Irvine. https://chrsdata.eng.uci.edu/
  15. Davarazar, P., & Lotfollahi, F. (2020). A scientometric study on the Analytical Hierarchy Process with emphasis on urban affairs management. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning, 11(2), 95–108
  16. Dharmarathna, G. I. D. D., Kaluthanthri, P. C., Abeynayake, M. D. I. K., & others. (2022). GIS-assisted multi-criteria evaluation of residential site suitability: Case study of Homagama Divisional Secretariat, Sri Lanka. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 11(4), 440. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2011.11.4.440
  17. Ekpodessi, S. G. N., & Nakamura, H. (2023). Impact of insecure land tenure on sustainable housing development: A case study of urban housing lands in the Republic of Benin, West Africa. Sustainability, 15(21), 15497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115497
  18. European Space Agency. (2021). Sentinel-2B imagery [Dataset]. Copernicus Open Access Hub. https://scihub.copernicus.eu/
  19. Ghosh, A. (Ed.). (2003). Urban environment management: Local government and community action (Vol. 7). Concept Publishing Company
  20. Greene, R., Devillers, R., Luther, J. E., & Eddy, B. G. (2011). GIS-based multiple-criteria decision analysis. Geography Compass, 5(6), 412–432
  21. Gunjal, S., Hassan, M. K., & Anees, M. (2024). Site suitability analysis for urban development: A case of Ranikhet, Uttarakhand. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2024.1370881
  22. Gurran, N., & Bramley, G. (2017). Urban planning and the housing market: International perspectives for policy and practice. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46403-3
  23. Han, S.-H. (2011). Location selection for residential development with AHP and GIS analysis modeling method. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 11(4), 440. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12524-012-0221-8
  24. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2023). Peta sebaran sekolah (Sekolah Kita) [Dataset]. Kemendikbudristek. https://sekolah.data.kemendikdasmen.go.id/
  25. Kristini, W., & Mulya, S. P. (2022). Disaster mitigation-based land suitability for settlements using multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) method in the northern part of South Barito Regency. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 950(1), 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/950/1/012015
  26. Kumar, M., & Shaikh, V. R. (2013). Site suitability analysis for urban development using GIS-based multicriteria evaluation technique. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 41(2), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-012-0221-8
  27. Lestari, I., Hariyanto, H., Hayati, R., Hanafi, F., & Dharma, A. S. (2025). Evaluasi Kesesuaian Lahan Kawasan Industri Terhadap Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah (RTRW) di Kabupaten Pati. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota, 21(2), 261-279. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v21i2.71133
  28. Kurniati, E., Sutanhaji, A. T., & Anggraini, O. A. (2013). Land acquisition and resettlement action plan (LARAP) of Dam Project using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP): A case study in Mujur Dam, Lombok Tengah District–West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 36–45
  29. Makropoulos, C. K., & Butler, D. (2006). Spatial ordered weighted averaging: Incorporating spatially variable attitude towards risk in spatial multi-criteria decision-making. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.09.015
  30. Marimin. (2004). Teknik dan aplikasi pengambilan keputusan kriteria majemuk. Jakarta: Grasindo
  31. Meng, Y., Malczewski, J., & Boroushaki, S. (2011). A GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis approach for mapping accessibility patterns of housing development sites: A case study in Canmore, Alberta. Journal of Geographic Information System, 3(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.4236/JGIS.2011.31004
  32. Moeinaddini, M., Khorasani, N., Danehkar, A., Darvishsefat, A. A., & Zienalyan, M. (2010). Siting MSW landfill using weighted linear combination and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology in GIS environment (Case study: Karaj). Waste Management, 30(5), 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.009
  33. Mokhtar, E. S., Idrees, M. O., Saad, N. M., & others. (2023). Geospatial analysis of sustainable living residential site suitability using Analytical Hierarchy Process. Planning Malaysia Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/169/1/012017
  34. Nugraha, Y. K., Nugraha, A. L., & Wijaya, A. P. (2014). Pemanfaatan SIG untuk menentukan lokasi potensial pengembangan kawasan perumahan dan permukiman (Studi kasus Kabupaten Boyolali). Jurnal Geodesi Undip, 3(4), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.14710/jgundip.2014.6795
  35. Pigawati, B., Yuliastuti, N., & Suryani, T. A. (2023). Land suitability for settlement development in Semarang coastal area. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1264(1), 012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1264/1/012032
  36. Santosh, C., Krishnaiah, C., & Deshbhandari, P. G. (2018). Site suitability analysis for urban development using GIS-based multicriteria evaluation technique: A case study in Chikodi Taluk, Belagavi District, Karnataka, India. Journal of Geographic Information System, 10(3), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2018.103020
  37. Syahputra, I. A., Munirwan, H., & Putri, H. T. (2024). Faktor Utama Pembentuk Permukiman Kumuh di Kelurahan Srengsem, Kota Bandar Lampung dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota, 20(1), 55 – 66. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v20i1.48122
  38. Sener, S., Sener, E., & Karagüzel, R. (2011). Solid waste disposal site selection with GIS and AHP methodology: A case study in Senirkent-Uluborlu (Isparta) Basin, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 173, 533–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1403-x
  39. Turk, S. S., & Altes, W. K. K. (2010). The provision of land for social housing in large urbanized areas in developing countries: The case of Istanbul (pp. 1–20). Delft University of Technology. https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3Af32e7690-fb87-4b95-8b2d-90424d5bdde4/datastream/OBJ/download
  40. Zhang, Y., & Fan, Q. (2020). The application of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in the assessment and improvement of the human settlement environment. Sustainability, 12(4), 1563

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-10-05 11:17:55

No citation recorded.