DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/geoplanning.4.1.83-96

SPATIAL TRANSFORMATION OF SURAKARTA’S PERIPHERAL RURAL VILLAGES UNDER IN-SITU URBANIZATION PHENOMENON : THE CASE OF GENTAN VILLAGE

*Lia Sparingga Purnamasari  -  Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia
Galing Yudana  -  Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia
Erma Fitria Rini  -  Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Surakarta is one of the rapidly growing Indonesian cities. The pressure towards its peripheral area results in ‘in-situ urbanization’ phenomenon of its rural village surroundings. Gentan is one of Surakarta adjacent rural villages that has been undergoing rapid spatial transformation from rural to urban settlement in the last 20 years (1995-2016). This research aims to clarify the spatial transformation in Gentan village through examinations of its spatial elements on higher resolution level; (1) transformation of its street network connectivity, (2) land use pattern, (3) building density, and (4) public facilities and accessibility. Secondary data from satellite imagery and government institution and primary data from field survey were used in this research as sources. From Gentan’s spatial elements observations, this research concluded that this village was transforming into urban settlements by its spatial elements characteristics. Furthermore, this research provides interesting findings by its analysis on the neighborhood level that while Gentan was transforming into urban settlement, its internal connectivity was decreasing, residential uses dominated its land use, the village was dominated by the formal settlement, and the reach distance of its public facilities fluctuated across the time.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Spatial Transformation; In Situ Urbanization; Peripheral Rural Villages

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research
Language : EN
Recent articles
A GIS BASED EVALUATION OF LAND USE CHANGES AND ECOLOGICAL CONNECTIVITY INDEX ADVANCED LAND COVER MAPPING OF TROPICAL PEAT SWAMP ECOSYSTEM USING AIRBORNE DISCRETE RETURN LIDAR LAND PRICE MAPPING OF JABODETABEK, INDONESIA More recent articles
Most cited articles
MODEL OF CLIMATE AND LAND-USE CHANGES IMPACT ON WATER SECURITY IN AMBON CITY, INDONESIA THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING AND ITS APPLICATION FOR FLOATING FISH NET CULTURE LAND PRICE MAPPING OF JABODETABEK, INDONESIA SUBAK LAND INFORMATION SYSTEM BASED ON REMOTE SENSING AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM IN DENPASAR CITY MAPPING AND ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC CONGESTION ON MAJOR ROADS IN MINNA (CASE STUDY OF CHANCHAGA L.G.A) More cited articles

  1. Anna, A. N., Kaeksi, R. W., & Astuti, W. A. (2010). Analisis Karakteristik Parameter Hidrologi Akibat Alih Fungsi Lahan di Daerah Sukoharjo Melalui Citra Landsat Tahun 1997 dengan Tahun 2002. Forum Geografi (14).

  2. Astuti, P. W. (2010). Pengaruh perkembangan kota Surakarta terhadap permukiman di kawasan Solobaru. UNS (Sebelas Maret University).

  3. Bentinck, J. V. (2000). Unruly urbanization on Delhi’s fringe: changing patterns of land use and livelihood. Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap, Faculteit der Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

  4. Berghauser-Pont, M. Y., & Haupt, P. (2010). Spacematrix: space, density and urban form. NAi Publishers Rotterdam.

  5. Bintarto, R. (1986). Urbanisasi dan permasalahannya. Yogyakarta: Ghalia.

  6. BPS. (2010). Peraturan Kepala Badan Statistik Tentang Klasifikasi Perkotaan dan Perdesaan di Indonesia.

  7. Brail, R. K., & Klosterman, R. E. (2001). Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools. ESRI Press. [https://books.google.co.id/books?id=S1DpDwSqCfsC">Google Book]

  8. Brookfield, H., Hadi, A. S., & Mahmud, Z. (1991). The city in the village: the in-situ urbanization of villages, villagers and their land around Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  9. Daldjoeni, N. (1998). Geografi Kota dan Desa. Alumni.

  10. Dempsey, N., et al. (2008). Elements of Urban Form. In Sustainable City Form (Vol. 2, pp. 21–51). [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8647-2">CrossRef]

  11. Duhri, M. K. (2015). Alih Fungsi Lahan Sukoharjo : Tak Ada Lagi Lahan Produktif di Gentan Baki. Retrieved from http://www.solopos.com/2015/02/17/alih-fungsi-lahan-sukoharjo-tak-ada-lagi-lahan-produktif-di-gentan-baki-577724">

  12. Firman, T., Kombaitan, B., & Pradono, P. (2007). The dynamics of Indonesia’s urbanisation, 1980--2006. Urban Policy and Research, 25(4), 433–454.

  13. Fitriastuti, R. (2010). Kawasan Perumahan Gentan Prospektif, Harga Tanah Melejit. Retrieved from http://edisicetak.joglosemar.co/berita/kawasan-perumahan-gentan-prospektif-harga-tanah-melejit-13132.html">

  14. Giyarsih, S. R. (2003). Transportasi dan Aksesibilitas Perdesaan. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Geografi Perdesaan Peluang dan Tantangan Pembangunan di Indonesia. 15 Desember 2003.

  15. Hareedy, A. N., & Deguchi, A. (2011). Transformation Patterns of Peripheral Villages Under Urbanization Pressure In Egypt. Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), 76(660), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.3130/aija.76.369

  16. Illert, A. (1991). Automatic digitization of large scale maps. In Autocarto Conference- (Vol. 6, p. 113).

  17. Jayadinata, J. T. (1986). Tata guna tanah dalam perencanaan pedesaan, perkotaan dan wilayah. Penerbit ITB.

  18. Jayanti, N. E. (2012). Transformasi spasial koridor surakarta-palur dan surakarta-kartosuro sebagai bagian dari wilayah peri urban kota surakarta. Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.

  19. Kalabamu, F., & Bolaane, B. (2013). Rapid urbanisation and housing transformations in Tlokweng, Botswana.

  20. Lu, S., Guan, X., He, C., & Zhang, J. (2014). Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Policy Implications of Urban Land Expansion in Metropolitan Areas: A Case Study of Wuhan Urban Agglomeration, Central China. Sustainability, 6(8), 4723–4748. [https://doi.org/10.3390/su6084723">CrossRef]

  21. Malarvizhi, K., Kumar, S. V., & Porchelvan, P. (2016). Use of High Resolution Google Earth Satellite Imagery in Landuse Map Preparation for Urban Related Applications. Procedia Technology, 24, 1835–1842. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.231">CrossRef]

  22. Mamas, S., Jones, G., & Sastrasuanda, T. (2001). A zonal analysis of demographic change in Indonesia’s megacities. Third World Planning Review, 23(2), 155–174. [https://doi.org/10.3828/twpr.23.2.8733x1hl2j517137">CrossRef]

  23. Mcgee, T. (2009). The Spatiality of Urbanization: The Policy Challenges of Mega-Urban and Desakota Regions of Southeast Asia.

  24. Mehmood, R., et al. (2016). Spatiotemporal Analysis of Urban Sprawl and Its Contributions to Climate and Environment of Peshawar Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. Journal of Geographic Information System, 8(2), 137–148. [https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2016.82013">CrossRef]

  25. Ohri, A., & Yadav, P. (2012). Urban sprawl mapping and land use change analysis using remote sensing and GIS. International Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS, 1(1), 12–25.

  26. Oktavia, P. (2010). Proses Urbanisasi di Kecamatan Jaten Kabupaten Karanganyar. Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta. Retrieved from https://eprints.uns.ac.id/3261/">

  27. Raza, S. M. H., et al. (2016). Spatiotemporal monitoring of urban sprawl and its impact assessment in district sheikhupura through remote sensing and GIS using satellite images from 1976-2014. Science International (Lahore), 28(2), 1583–1588.

  28. Setyono, J. S., Yunus, H. S., & Giyarsih, S. R. (2016). The Spatial Pattern of Urbanization and Small Cities Development in Central Java: a Case Study of Semarang-Yogyakarta-Surakarta Region. Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning, 3(1), 53–66. [https://doi.org/10.14710/geoplanning.3.1.53-66">CrossRef]

  29. Sinulingga, B. D. (1999). Pembangunan kota: tinjauan regional dan lokal. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

  30. Soetomo, S. (2009). Urbanisasi dan Morfologi (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

  31. Song, Y., & Knaap, G.-J. (2004). Measuring Urban Form: Is Portland Winning the War on Sprawl? Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), 210–225. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976371">CrossRef]

  32. Southworth, M. (1997). Walkable suburbs? An evaluation of neotraditional communities at the urban edge. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1), 28–44.

  33. Tamin, O. Z. (2000). Perencanaan dan pemodelan transportasi. ITB, Bandung.

  34. UN Habitat. (2015). Habitat III Issue Papers : 10 – Urban Rural Linkages. New York.

  35. Yang, X., & Lo, C. P. (2002). Using a time series of satellite imagery to detect land use and land cover changes in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(9), 1775–1798. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160110075802">CrossRef]

  36. Yunus, H. S. (2006). Megapolitan: konsep, problematika, dan prospek. Pustaka Pelajar.

  37. Yunus, H. S. (2008). Dinamika wilayah peri-urban: determinan masa depan kota. Pustaka Pelajar.

  38. Zhu, Y. (2000). In Situ Urbanization in Rural China: Case Studies from Fujian Province. Development and Change, 31(2), 413–434. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00160">CrossRef]

  39. Zhu, Y. (2002). Beyond large-city-centred urbanisation: in situ transformation of rural areas in Fujian Province. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 43(1), 9–22. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8373.00155">CrossRef]

  40. Zhu, Y. (2004). Changing Urbanization Processes and In Situ Rural-Urban Transformation: Reflections on China’s Settlement Definitions. In T. Champion & G. Hugo (Eds.) (pp. 207–228). Ashgate Publishing Ltd.


Last update:

  1. Understanding the Informal Morphology of Villages-in-the-City: A Case Study in Hanoi City, Vietnam

    Ngo Kien Thinh, Yun Gao. Sustainability, 13 (23), 2021. doi: 10.3390/su132313136

Last update: 2024-04-20 11:37:55

No citation recorded.