skip to main content

THE CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION OF WOMEN'S POLITICAL RIGHTS

*Tanto Lailam  -  University of Cologne, Germany
Nita Andrianti  -  Goethe University Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The research focuses on the gender equality and justice interpretation of women's political rights in the Constitutional Court decisions. The problem is how does the interpretation of the constitution protect and fulfill women's political rights?. The research method is legal doctrinal, focusing on constitutional interpretation with several approaches, including the statutory, analytical, and case approaches. The result of the research shows that the function of the Court as a protector of women's political rights is a consequence of the existence of human rights in the  1945 Constitution. Its guarantees the constitutional review authority to protect human rights. Based on several decisions of the Court: affirmative action case, leadership positions in the house of representatives case, the women position of governor and vice governor's appointment in a Special Region of Yogyakarta. These decisions, which are above cases, are a form of protection and fulfillment of women's political rights in realizing gender equality and justice. Of course, it is motivated by the fact that women's representation must be present in every political decision-making in the national and local governance.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Constitutional Court; Women; Political Rights; Gender Equality; Justice

Article Metrics:

  1. Butt, Simon. “The Indonesian Constitutional Court: Reconfiguring Decentralization for Better or Worse?” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 14, no. 1 (2019): 147–174. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/asian-journal-of-comparative-law/article/indonesian-constitutional-court-reconfiguring-decentralization-for-better-or-worse/00B5ECC01E8761330D87951CF74B8CB0
  2. Crouch, Melissa. “Judicial Review and Religious Freedom: The Case of Indonesian Ahmadis.” Sidney Law Review 34 (2012): 545–572. http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/journals/SydLawRw/2012/25.html
  3. Fraser, Nancy, and Kate Bedford. “Social Rights and Gender Justice in the Neoliberal Moment: A Conversation about Welfare and Transnational Politics.” Feminist Theory 9, no. 2 (2008): 225–245
  4. Gaffar, Janedjri M. “Peran Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Terkait Penyelenggaraan Pemilu.” Jurnal Konstitusi 10, no. 1 (2013): 1–31. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/93
  5. Gordon, Eleanor. Justice and Gender. Genewa – Switzerland: DCAF, OSCE/ODIHR, UN Women, 2019
  6. Hendrianto, Stefanus. Law and Politics of Constitutional Courts: Indonesia and the Search for Judicial Heroes. London: Routledge, 2018
  7. Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak. Pembangunan Manusia Berbasis Gender 2013. Jakarta: Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak, 2013
  8. Kusuma, Pan Mohamad Faiz. “The Role of the Constitutional Court in Securing Constitutional Government in Indonesia.” University of Queensland, 2016
  9. Lailam, Tanto. “Penafsiran Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang Terhadap Undangundang Dasar 1945.” Jurnal Media Hukum 21, no. 1 (2014): 88–106. https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/1159
  10. ———. “Penataan Kelembagaan Pengujian Norma Hukum Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 1 (2018): 206–230. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1267
  11. ———. Pertentangan Norma Hukum Dalam Teori Dan Praktik Pengujian Undang-Undang Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LP3M UMY, 2015
  12. Lidwina, Andrea. “Calon Kepala Daerah Perempuan Lebih Sedikit Dari Laki-Laki Di Pilkada 2020.” Databoks. Last modified 2020. Accessed October 15, 2021. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2020/11/13/calon-kepala-daerah-perempuan-lebih-sedikit-dari-laki-laki-di-pilkada-2020
  13. Nardi, Dominic J. “Embedded Judicial Autonomy: How NGOs and Public Opinion Influence Indonesia’s Constitutional Court.” The University of Michigan, 2018. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/144040
  14. Omara, Andy. “Protecting Economic and Social Rights in A Constitutionally Strong Form of Judicial Review: The Case of Constitutional Review by The Indonesian Constitutional Court.” University of Washington, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/40921
  15. Palguna, I Dewa Gede. Pengaduan Konstitusional (Constitutional Complaint): Upaya Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013
  16. Rahmatunnisa, Mudiyati. “Affirmative Action Dan Penguatan Partisipasi Politik Kaum Perempuan.” Jurnal Wacana Politik 1, no. 2 (2016): 90–95. http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/wacanapolitik/article/view/11049
  17. Satriawan, Iwan, and Tanto Lailam. Open Legal Policy in the Constitutional Court Decisions and National Legislation Making. Amsterdam: Atlantis Press, 2019
  18. Satriawan, Iwan, and Khairil Azmin Mokhtar. “The Role of Indonesian Constitutional Court in Resolving Disputes among the State Organs.” Hasanuddin Law Review 5, no. 2 (2019): 159–179. http://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/article/view/1669
  19. Setiyono, Joko. “Human Rights Based Law Enforcement for the Violation of Local Regulation By Civil Service Police of Semarang Municipality.” Diponegoro Law Review 1, no. 1 (2016): 61–80. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/12207
  20. Syafputri, Ella. “Keterwakilan Perempuan Di Parlemen: Komparasi Indonesia Dan Korea Selatan.” Global South Review 1, no. 2 (2014): 165–175. https://journal.ugm.ac.id/globalsouth/article/view/28839
  21. Tridewiyanti, Kunthi. “Kesetaraan Dan Keadilan Gender Di Bidang Politik ‘ Pentingnya Partisipasi Dan Keterwakilan Perempuan Di Legislatif.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 9, no. 1 (2012): 73–90. https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/377
  22. Umagapi, Juniar Laraswanda. “Representasi Perempuan Di Parlemen Hasil Pemilu 2019: Tantangan Dan Peluang.” Kajian 25, no. 1 (2020): 19–34. https://jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/kajian/article/view/1886
  23. Utami, Penny Naluria. “Optimalisasi Pemenuhan Hak Korban Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan Melalui Pusat Pelayanan Terpadu.” Jurnal HAM 7, no. 1 (2016): 55–67. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/ham/article/view/71
  24. Wicaksono, Dian Agung, Ananda Prima Yurista, and Almonika Cindy Fatika Sari. “Mendudukkan Kasultanan Dan Kadipaten Sebagai Subyek Hak Milik Atas Tanah Kasultanan Dan Tanah Kadipaten Dalam Keistimewaan Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 8, no. 3 (2019): 311–328. https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/ejournal/index.php/jrv/article/view/342
  25. “What Is Gender Justice.” Global Fund for Women. Accessed October 15, 2021. https://www.globalfundforwomen.org/what-we-do/gender-justice

Last update:

  1. The Indonesian Constitutional Court Approaches the Proportionality Principle to the Cases Involving Competing Rights

    Tanto Lailam, Putri Anggia. LAW REFORM, 19 (1), 2023. doi: 10.14710/lr.v19i1.54087

Last update: 2024-11-20 07:52:09

No citation recorded.