skip to main content

RESTORING CUSTOMARY FOREST RIGHTS THROUGH AGRARIAN REFORM: CASE STUDY OF THE KAMPAR COMMUNITY, INDONESIA

*Mhd Zakiul Fikri orcid  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Diponegoro Law Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Approximately three-quarters of Kampar Regency is designated as state forest, despite the historical presence of indigenous communities for generations. Accordingly, this study examines on analyzing the framework for restoring the customary forest rights of these through agrarian reform, emphasizing social forestry. Employing a socio-legal research method, the study combines textual analysis of legal frameworks and case studies of Kampar's indigenous communities. The research examines two key issues: (1) the presence of indigenous communities and the concept of customary forest utilization in Kampar Regency, and (2) the importance of restoring indigenous communities’ rights to forests through social forestry initiatives. The findings reveal that indigenous communities in Kampar Regency maintain a strong connection to their ancestral heritage, viewing customary forest as inalienable heritage. The restoration of indigenous communities’ rights to these forest territories is considered essential. Social forestry is identified as a critical component of agrarian reform in Indonesia, with existing regulatory frameworks explicitly acknowledging indigenous communities as beneficiaries. Several areas of customary forest in Kampar Regency have also been identified as having potential for designation through social forestry programs.

 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Agrarian Reform; Customary Forests; Indigenous Peoples; Kampar; Social Forestry

Article Metrics:

  1. Abidin, Zainal. Silsilah (Otok Cacau) Ninik Mamak Dalam Masyarakat Kampar. Edited by Zainal Abidin. Bangkinang: Dinas Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Kabupaten Kampar, 2014
  2. Administrative Court. Pekanbaru Administrative Court Decision No. 38/G/TF/2022/PTUN.PBR (2023)
  3. Akbar, Ali. Kemitraan Adat Tali Berpilin Tiga Daerah Kampar-Riau. Bangkinang: LKATIKA Kabupaten Kampar, 1996
  4. Alfiander, Dodon, Ikhsan Azhari, and Irma Suryani. “Settlement of Pusako-Tinggi Property Disputes in Nagari Sungai Tarab.” Al-Qisthu: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum 20, no. 1 (2022): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.32694/qst.v20i1.1140
  5. Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara. “Catatan Akhir Tahun 2023, Masyarakat Adat Di Tahun Politik: Di Tengah Hukum Represif & Cengkraman Oligarki.” Jakarta Selatan, 2023. https://www.aman.or.id/publication-documentation/239
  6. Anggraini, Devi. The Impact of Religious and Customary Laws and Practices on Women’s Inheritance Rights in Indonesi. Bogor: Sajogyo Institute, 2015
  7. Arizona, Yance, and Erasmus Cahyadi. “The Revival of Indigenous Peoples: Contestations over a Special Legislation on Masyarakat Adat.” In Adat and Indigeneity in Indonesia, edited by Brigitta Hauser-Schäublin, 43–62. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen, 2013
  8. Badan Registrasi Wilayah Adat. “The Registration of Indigenous Peoples (IP’s) Maps in BRWA.” Badan Registrasi Wilayah Adat, 2019. https://brwa.or.id/assets/image/rujukan/1589779756.pdf
  9. Boag, Carly. “A Comparative Study of the Legal Frameworks Facilitating Indigenous Land Management in Postcolonial Societies: Indigenous Australia and Indonesian Adat Law.” Brawijaya Law Journal 3, no. 2 (November 1, 2016): 125–50. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2016.003.02.03
  10. BPS-Statistic of Kampar Regency. “Area of Forestry by Kind and District, 2015,” 2017. https://kamparkab.bps.go.id/statictable/2017/06/08/56/-luas-hutan-menurut-jenis-hutan-dan-kecamatan-2015.html
  11. ———. “Kampar Regency in Figures 2024.” Bangkinang, 2024. https://kamparkab.bps.go.id/publication/download.html?nrbvfeve=ZTMzNWQzNDdkOGFkMTY3N2FjMjBjMDcz&xzmn=aHR0cHM6Ly9rYW1wYXJrYWIuYnBzLmdvLmlkL3B1YmxpY2F0aW9uLzIwMjQvMDIvMjgvZTMzNWQzNDdkOGFkMTY3N2FjMjBjMDczL2thYnVwYXRlbi1rYW1wYXItZGFsYW0tYW5na2EtMjAyNC5odG1s&t
  12. Buana, Mirza Satria. “Development as a Threat to Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Indonesia.” International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 27, no. 3 (2020): 442–71. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02703003
  13. Budiono, Rahmat, Bramasto Nugroho, Hardjanto, and Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat. “The Village Forest as a Counter Teritorialization by Village Communities in Kampar Peninsula Riau.” Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 24, no. 3 (2018): 115–25. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.24.3.115
  14. Court, Bangkinang District. Bangkinang District Court Decision No. 41/Pdt.G/LH/2021/PN.Bkn (2022)
  15. Fikri, Mhd Zakiul. Dari Gerakan Sosial Menuju Pengakuan Hukum: Politik Hukum Hak Atas Tanah Masyarakat Adat Sibiruang Perspektif Lokal Hingga Internasional. Jakarta Selatan: CELIOS Publishing House, 2024
  16. ———. Reforma Agraria Tanah Ulayat. Sleman: STPN Press, 2021
  17. H.B., Gusliana, Ikhsan Ikhsan, and Ferawati Ferawati. “The Status of Indigenous Forest in Riau Province” 442, no. Ramlas 2019 (2020): 52–56. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200529.266
  18. Haryono, D., E. Firdaus, M. Indra, D. Artina, S. Andrikasmi, and P. Jehwae. “Legal Policy on the Protection of Ulayat Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Kampar Regency.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1181, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1181/1/012015
  19. Hasanah, Ulfia, Davit Rahmadan, and Hayatul Ismi. “Study the Position of Husband and Wife in Marriage Based on Customary Law in Kampar.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 10, no. 4 (2019): 246–59
  20. Hidayat, Herman, Herry Yogaswara, Tuti Herawati, Patricia Blazey, Stephen Wyatt, and Richard Howitt. “Forests, Law and Customary Rights in Indonesia: Implications of a Decision of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in 2012.” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 59, no. 3 (2018): 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12207
  21. Irianto, Sulistyowati. “Memperkenalkan Kajian Sosio-Legal Dan Implikasi Metodologisnya.” In Kajian Sosio-Legal, edited by Adriaan W Bednerd, Sulistyowati Irianto, Julian Michiel Otto, and Theresia Dyah Wirastri, 1–18. Denpasar, Jakarta: Pustaka Larasa, Universitas Indonesia, Universitas Leiden, Universitas Groningen, 2012
  22. Kosuke, Mizuno, Hayati Sari Hasibuan, Okamoto Masaaki, and Farha Widya Asrofani. Creation of the State Forest System and Its Hostility to Local People in Colonial Java, Indonesia. Southeast Asian Studies. Vol. 12, 2023. https://doi.org/10.20495/seas.12.1_47
  23. Lestari, Rika, and Djoko Sukisno. “Kajian Hak Ulayat Di Kabupaten Kampar Dalam Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Dan Hukum Adat.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 28, no. 1 (2021): 94–114. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss1.art5
  24. Moffett, Luke. “Transitional Justice and Reparations: Remedying the Past?” In Research Handbook on Transitional Justice, edited by Cheryl Lawther, Luke Moffett, and Dov Jacobs, 377–400. Cheltenham & Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781955314
  25. Mohamed, Khadijah. “Combining Methods in Legal Research.” Social Sciences (Pakistan) 11, no. 21 (2016): 5191–98. https://doi.org/10.3923/sscience.2016.5191.5198
  26. Multhahada Ramadhani Siregar, Sitti Rahma, and Alemina Br. Perangin-angin. “The Application of Feminism in Minangkabau Matrilineal System.” Talenta Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts (LWSA) 3, no. 4 (December 4, 2020): 100–103. https://doi.org/10.32734/lwsa.v3i4.1141
  27. Mustafid, Mustafid, Kemas Muhammad Gemilang, Firman Surya Putra, Azzuhri Al Bajuri, and Mawardi Mawardi. “Alternative Legal Strategies and Ninik Mamak Authority: Dual Administration of Malay Marriage in Koto Kampar Hulu, Riau.” Journal of Islamic Law 5, no. 1 (January 29, 2024): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v5i1.1972
  28. Nalle, Victor Imanuel W. “The Relevance of Socio-Legal Studies in Legal Science.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 27, no. 1 (February 15, 2015): 179. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15905
  29. Purnomo, Bambang Herry, Jonaedi Efendi, Prasetijo Rijadi, and Archi Rafferti Kriswandanu. “Empirical and Socio-Legal Approach of a Legal Research (Legal Research Perspective in Indonesia).” Journal of Tianjin University Science and Technology 54, no. 07 (2021): 86–97. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5J4Q2
  30. Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja, Luca Tacconi, Sean Sloan, Faridh Almuhayat Uhib Hamdani, Subarudi, Iis Alviya, and Muhammad Zahrul Muttaqin. “Indonesia’s Land Reform: Implications for Local Livelihoods and Climate Change.” Forest Policy and Economics 108, no. April (2019): 101903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.04.007
  31. Safitri, Myrna. “Dividing the Land: Legal Gaps in the Recognition of Customary Land in Indonesian Forest Areas.” Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of Third World Studies 30, no. 2,1 (2017): 31–48. https://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/kasarinlan/article/view/5705
  32. Simarmata, R; Dewi, S. N.; Sasmitha, T. “Tenure Options : Toward the Recognition of Customary and Local Community Rights to Land and Forest.” Policy Brief Forest Peoples Programme, no. 11 (2021): 1–10
  33. Siregar, Fatahuddin Aziz, Febri Yulika, Nofialdi Nofialdi, Ikhwanuddin Harahap, Benny Ridwan, and Iswandi Syahputra. “Merantau in The Ethnic Tradition of Minangkabau: Local Custom Without Sharia Basis?” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 1 (June 16, 2022): 115. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i1.9954
  34. Sonen, Shunuram. “Legal Research Methodology: An Overview.” Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) Vol. 8, no. 10 (2021): d443. https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2110354.pdf
  35. Sumarsono, Sumarsono; S., Lindyastuti; Widyanto, Y. Sigit. Sistem Pemerintahan Tradisional Di Riau. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia, 1997
  36. Tarigan, Abetnego P.P., and Mahawan Karuniasa. “Analysis of Agrarian Conflict Resolution through Social Forestry Scheme.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 716, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/716/1/012082
  37. Willya, Evra, Muh Idris, and Sabil Mokondenseho. “The Debate Between Religious and Minangkabau Traditional Figures About Pagang Gadai (Pawn) Land in Agam Regency, West Sumatra, Indonesia.” Ahkam : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 24, no. 1 (June 30, 2024). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v24i1.32101
  38. Wira, Ahmad, Nurul Huda, Ahmad Sunawari Long, Wahyuni Lely Augusna, Meirison, and Yenti Afrida. “Legal Study of Dzurri Waqf and Its Implementation towards Strengthening High Heritage Assets in Minangkabau, West Sumatra, Indonesia.” Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah 22, no. 2 (2023): 329–41. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i2.9383

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-01-20 21:22:57

No citation recorded.